Gamal Alkawsi , Nazrita Ibrahim , Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi , Abdulsalam Salihu Mustafa , Husni Mohd Radzi , Luiz Fernando Capretz
{"title":"采用住宅太阳能光伏系统的决定因素及其对环境可持续性的影响:来自 PLS-SEM 和模糊集(fsQCA)的证据","authors":"Gamal Alkawsi , Nazrita Ibrahim , Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi , Abdulsalam Salihu Mustafa , Husni Mohd Radzi , Luiz Fernando Capretz","doi":"10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In response to the escalating global CO2 emissions and the urgent need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, this study diverges from prior research that predominantly focuses on intentions or attitudes towards renewable energy. It investigates the actual uptake of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in regions rich in solar radiation, where, despite the potential, renewables remain a minor part of the energy mix. Incorporating psychological and functional factors and employing the innovation resistance theory (IRT), the study comprehensively examines solar PV technology’s resistance aspects. Utilizing a robust methodological framework that uses partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), the research evaluates responses from a comprehensive questionnaire survey of 758 households. The advantages of this method lie in its ability to capture both symmetric and asymmetric relationships, thereby offering a richer and more detailed analysis compared to traditional single-method approaches. PLS-SEM results identify significant barriers: image barriers (β = −0.131, t = 3.418, p < 0.001), traditional barriers (β = −0.084, t = 2.143, p < 0.05), and risk barriers (β = −0.124, t = 4.172, p < 0.001). Positive influences include environmental benefits (β = 0.166, t = 3.108, p < 0.001), environmental concern (β = 0.364, t = 6.341, p < 0.001), and government incentives (β = 0.159, t = 2.767, p < 0.01). Conversely, usage barriers and value barriers appeared non-influential. Conversely, fsQCA revealed that all factors may have a role in the uptake of residential solar PV systems. The novelty of this research is evident in its application of IRT to the context of solar PV adoption and the use of a hybrid analytical method, which together provide new insights into consumer behavior and policy implications. These findings offer actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to promote the adoption of residential solar PV systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48609,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101795"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098624001812/pdfft?md5=bf0ce0af1b517fab4dea2ee3fddbe9a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2215098624001812-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of uptake the residential solar photovoltaic system and its impact on environmental sustainability: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)\",\"authors\":\"Gamal Alkawsi , Nazrita Ibrahim , Mohammed A. Al-Sharafi , Abdulsalam Salihu Mustafa , Husni Mohd Radzi , Luiz Fernando Capretz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jestch.2024.101795\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In response to the escalating global CO2 emissions and the urgent need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, this study diverges from prior research that predominantly focuses on intentions or attitudes towards renewable energy. It investigates the actual uptake of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in regions rich in solar radiation, where, despite the potential, renewables remain a minor part of the energy mix. Incorporating psychological and functional factors and employing the innovation resistance theory (IRT), the study comprehensively examines solar PV technology’s resistance aspects. Utilizing a robust methodological framework that uses partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), the research evaluates responses from a comprehensive questionnaire survey of 758 households. The advantages of this method lie in its ability to capture both symmetric and asymmetric relationships, thereby offering a richer and more detailed analysis compared to traditional single-method approaches. PLS-SEM results identify significant barriers: image barriers (β = −0.131, t = 3.418, p < 0.001), traditional barriers (β = −0.084, t = 2.143, p < 0.05), and risk barriers (β = −0.124, t = 4.172, p < 0.001). Positive influences include environmental benefits (β = 0.166, t = 3.108, p < 0.001), environmental concern (β = 0.364, t = 6.341, p < 0.001), and government incentives (β = 0.159, t = 2.767, p < 0.01). Conversely, usage barriers and value barriers appeared non-influential. Conversely, fsQCA revealed that all factors may have a role in the uptake of residential solar PV systems. The novelty of this research is evident in its application of IRT to the context of solar PV adoption and the use of a hybrid analytical method, which together provide new insights into consumer behavior and policy implications. These findings offer actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to promote the adoption of residential solar PV systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48609,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101795\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098624001812/pdfft?md5=bf0ce0af1b517fab4dea2ee3fddbe9a9&pid=1-s2.0-S2215098624001812-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098624001812\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Science and Technology-An International Journal-Jestech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098624001812","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determinants of uptake the residential solar photovoltaic system and its impact on environmental sustainability: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA)
In response to the escalating global CO2 emissions and the urgent need to reduce dependence on fossil fuels, this study diverges from prior research that predominantly focuses on intentions or attitudes towards renewable energy. It investigates the actual uptake of residential solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in regions rich in solar radiation, where, despite the potential, renewables remain a minor part of the energy mix. Incorporating psychological and functional factors and employing the innovation resistance theory (IRT), the study comprehensively examines solar PV technology’s resistance aspects. Utilizing a robust methodological framework that uses partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) with fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), the research evaluates responses from a comprehensive questionnaire survey of 758 households. The advantages of this method lie in its ability to capture both symmetric and asymmetric relationships, thereby offering a richer and more detailed analysis compared to traditional single-method approaches. PLS-SEM results identify significant barriers: image barriers (β = −0.131, t = 3.418, p < 0.001), traditional barriers (β = −0.084, t = 2.143, p < 0.05), and risk barriers (β = −0.124, t = 4.172, p < 0.001). Positive influences include environmental benefits (β = 0.166, t = 3.108, p < 0.001), environmental concern (β = 0.364, t = 6.341, p < 0.001), and government incentives (β = 0.159, t = 2.767, p < 0.01). Conversely, usage barriers and value barriers appeared non-influential. Conversely, fsQCA revealed that all factors may have a role in the uptake of residential solar PV systems. The novelty of this research is evident in its application of IRT to the context of solar PV adoption and the use of a hybrid analytical method, which together provide new insights into consumer behavior and policy implications. These findings offer actionable recommendations for policymakers and practitioners to promote the adoption of residential solar PV systems.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal (JESTECH) (formerly Technology), a peer-reviewed quarterly engineering journal, publishes both theoretical and experimental high quality papers of permanent interest, not previously published in journals, in the field of engineering and applied science which aims to promote the theory and practice of technology and engineering. In addition to peer-reviewed original research papers, the Editorial Board welcomes original research reports, state-of-the-art reviews and communications in the broadly defined field of engineering science and technology.
The scope of JESTECH includes a wide spectrum of subjects including:
-Electrical/Electronics and Computer Engineering (Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation; Coding, Cryptography, and Information Protection; Communications, Networks, Mobile Computing and Distributed Systems; Compilers and Operating Systems; Computer Architecture, Parallel Processing, and Dependability; Computer Vision and Robotics; Control Theory; Electromagnetic Waves, Microwave Techniques and Antennas; Embedded Systems; Integrated Circuits, VLSI Design, Testing, and CAD; Microelectromechanical Systems; Microelectronics, and Electronic Devices and Circuits; Power, Energy and Energy Conversion Systems; Signal, Image, and Speech Processing)
-Mechanical and Civil Engineering (Automotive Technologies; Biomechanics; Construction Materials; Design and Manufacturing; Dynamics and Control; Energy Generation, Utilization, Conversion, and Storage; Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics; Heat and Mass Transfer; Micro-Nano Sciences; Renewable and Sustainable Energy Technologies; Robotics and Mechatronics; Solid Mechanics and Structure; Thermal Sciences)
-Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (Advanced Materials Science; Biomaterials; Ceramic and Inorgnanic Materials; Electronic-Magnetic Materials; Energy and Environment; Materials Characterizastion; Metallurgy; Polymers and Nanocomposites)