增选董事会对企业碳绩效的影响:来自财务材料行业的证据

IF 2.1 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics Letters Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111910
{"title":"增选董事会对企业碳绩效的影响:来自财务材料行业的证据","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the relationship between co-opted boards and corporate carbon performance. Results show that co-opted boards decrease GHG intensity in financially material industries with no effect in non-financially material industries. For firms in financially material industries, this relationship is time-variant and positive when we interact GHG intensity with R&amp;D investments. This result posits inefficient R&amp;D allocation in the presence of co-opted boards. Our findings bring a more nuanced picture concerning the influence of co-opted boards on corporate carbon performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400394X/pdfft?md5=549ea4bab2c2174ca6f81e6ea8f44227&pid=1-s2.0-S016517652400394X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of co-opted boards on corporate carbon performance: Evidence from financially material industries\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econlet.2024.111910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examine the relationship between co-opted boards and corporate carbon performance. Results show that co-opted boards decrease GHG intensity in financially material industries with no effect in non-financially material industries. For firms in financially material industries, this relationship is time-variant and positive when we interact GHG intensity with R&amp;D investments. This result posits inefficient R&amp;D allocation in the presence of co-opted boards. Our findings bring a more nuanced picture concerning the influence of co-opted boards on corporate carbon performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400394X/pdfft?md5=549ea4bab2c2174ca6f81e6ea8f44227&pid=1-s2.0-S016517652400394X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400394X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016517652400394X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了增选董事会与企业碳绩效之间的关系。结果表明,增选董事会降低了财务重要行业的温室气体强度,而对非财务重要行业没有影响。对于财务材料型行业的企业,当我们将温室气体强度与研发投资进行交互时,这种关系是时变的,并且是正向的。这一结果表明,在董事会增选的情况下,研究与开发投资的分配是低效的。我们的研究结果使增选董事会对企业碳绩效的影响更加细致入微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of co-opted boards on corporate carbon performance: Evidence from financially material industries

We examine the relationship between co-opted boards and corporate carbon performance. Results show that co-opted boards decrease GHG intensity in financially material industries with no effect in non-financially material industries. For firms in financially material industries, this relationship is time-variant and positive when we interact GHG intensity with R&D investments. This result posits inefficient R&D allocation in the presence of co-opted boards. Our findings bring a more nuanced picture concerning the influence of co-opted boards on corporate carbon performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
期刊最新文献
Airline industry equities under external uncertainty shocks Trends in temperature data: Micro-foundations of their nature Political connections of independent directors and earnings quality: The case of French firms Characterizing a probabilistic version of the Boston mechanism under weak priorities Does analyst forecast informativeness affect managers’ financial reporting incentives?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1