年龄的殖民性:黑人童年的时间政治学导航。

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY British Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13141
Callum Stewart
{"title":"年龄的殖民性:黑人童年的时间政治学导航。","authors":"Callum Stewart","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For Black, Indigenous, and other colonised peoples, decolonisation and racial justice are urgent imperatives, but their demands are often dismissed as utopian, impossible, or otherwise out-of-time. This article therefore introduces the coloniality of age as a theoretical framework that aims to open up possibilities for otherwise worlds. Departing from established accounts of the coloniality of time, the coloniality of age grounds the analysis of racialised time in the chronopolitical formations of tempus nullius and the paternalistic paradigm. Alongside the doctrine of terra nullius or 'uninhabited land', the doctrine of tempus nullius or 'uninhabited time' works to deny Black peoples the ability to make and remake history on their own terms. Supplementing theories of the barbarian other, the paternalistic paradigm identifies patriarchal father/child relations as a conceptual and historical precedent to race. The coloniality of age directs the analysis to the temporal limits of coloniality. I argue that the temporal limits of coloniality are constituted by Black childhood; the coloniality of age figures Black childhood as an age with no future. This framework is then applied to analyse young Black peoples' counter-narratives of Black childhood. The counter-narratives of being 'stuck', 'growing up', the 'pace' of racism, and 'regressing' centre the temporal agency of Black children as they navigate the chronopolitics of Black childhood. Each of these counter-narratives unsettles the coloniality of age. Read together, the counter-narratives tell a larger story of Black children confronting the temporal limits of coloniality, refusing the terms of White futurity, and instead opting to grow otherwise. The article concludes that Black childhood might be reframed as an age with otherwise futures beyond the temporal limits of coloniality.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The coloniality of age: Navigating the chronopolitics of Black childhood.\",\"authors\":\"Callum Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-4446.13141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For Black, Indigenous, and other colonised peoples, decolonisation and racial justice are urgent imperatives, but their demands are often dismissed as utopian, impossible, or otherwise out-of-time. This article therefore introduces the coloniality of age as a theoretical framework that aims to open up possibilities for otherwise worlds. Departing from established accounts of the coloniality of time, the coloniality of age grounds the analysis of racialised time in the chronopolitical formations of tempus nullius and the paternalistic paradigm. Alongside the doctrine of terra nullius or 'uninhabited land', the doctrine of tempus nullius or 'uninhabited time' works to deny Black peoples the ability to make and remake history on their own terms. Supplementing theories of the barbarian other, the paternalistic paradigm identifies patriarchal father/child relations as a conceptual and historical precedent to race. The coloniality of age directs the analysis to the temporal limits of coloniality. I argue that the temporal limits of coloniality are constituted by Black childhood; the coloniality of age figures Black childhood as an age with no future. This framework is then applied to analyse young Black peoples' counter-narratives of Black childhood. The counter-narratives of being 'stuck', 'growing up', the 'pace' of racism, and 'regressing' centre the temporal agency of Black children as they navigate the chronopolitics of Black childhood. Each of these counter-narratives unsettles the coloniality of age. Read together, the counter-narratives tell a larger story of Black children confronting the temporal limits of coloniality, refusing the terms of White futurity, and instead opting to grow otherwise. The article concludes that Black childhood might be reframed as an age with otherwise futures beyond the temporal limits of coloniality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13141\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13141","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于黑人、原住民和其他殖民地人民来说,非殖民化和种族正义是当务之急,但他们的要求往往被视为乌托邦、不可能或不合时宜。因此,本文提出了 "年龄的殖民性 "这一理论框架,旨在为其他世界开辟可能性。与既有的时间殖民论不同,年龄殖民论将种族化时间的分析建立在 "无主地"(tempus nullius)的时间政治形式和家长制范式之上。除了 "无主地 "或 "无人居住的土地 "理论之外,"无主时间 "或 "无人居住的时间 "理论也剥夺了黑人按照自己的方式创造和重塑历史的能力。作为对野蛮他者理论的补充,家长制范式将父权制的父子关系视为种族的概念和历史先例。年龄的殖民性将分析引向殖民性的时间限制。我认为,殖民性的时间限制是由黑人童年构成的;年龄的殖民性将黑人童年描绘成一个没有未来的时代。这一框架随后被用于分析黑人青年对黑人童年的反叙述。被 "困住"、"长大"、种族主义的 "步伐 "和 "倒退 "等反叙述集中体现了黑人儿童在黑人童年的时间政治中的时间能动性。每一种反叙述都颠覆了年龄的殖民性。综合来看,这些反叙述讲述了一个更大的故事,即黑人儿童面对殖民主义的时间限制,拒绝白人的未来条款,而是选择以其他方式成长。文章的结论是,黑人童年可以被重构为一个具有超越殖民主义时间限制的其他未来的时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The coloniality of age: Navigating the chronopolitics of Black childhood.

For Black, Indigenous, and other colonised peoples, decolonisation and racial justice are urgent imperatives, but their demands are often dismissed as utopian, impossible, or otherwise out-of-time. This article therefore introduces the coloniality of age as a theoretical framework that aims to open up possibilities for otherwise worlds. Departing from established accounts of the coloniality of time, the coloniality of age grounds the analysis of racialised time in the chronopolitical formations of tempus nullius and the paternalistic paradigm. Alongside the doctrine of terra nullius or 'uninhabited land', the doctrine of tempus nullius or 'uninhabited time' works to deny Black peoples the ability to make and remake history on their own terms. Supplementing theories of the barbarian other, the paternalistic paradigm identifies patriarchal father/child relations as a conceptual and historical precedent to race. The coloniality of age directs the analysis to the temporal limits of coloniality. I argue that the temporal limits of coloniality are constituted by Black childhood; the coloniality of age figures Black childhood as an age with no future. This framework is then applied to analyse young Black peoples' counter-narratives of Black childhood. The counter-narratives of being 'stuck', 'growing up', the 'pace' of racism, and 'regressing' centre the temporal agency of Black children as they navigate the chronopolitics of Black childhood. Each of these counter-narratives unsettles the coloniality of age. Read together, the counter-narratives tell a larger story of Black children confronting the temporal limits of coloniality, refusing the terms of White futurity, and instead opting to grow otherwise. The article concludes that Black childhood might be reframed as an age with otherwise futures beyond the temporal limits of coloniality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: British Journal of Sociology is published on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is unique in the United Kingdom in its concentration on teaching and research across the full range of the social, political and economic sciences. Founded in 1895 by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the LSE is one of the largest colleges within the University of London and has an outstanding reputation for academic excellence nationally and internationally. Mission Statement: • To be a leading sociology journal in terms of academic substance, scholarly reputation , with relevance to and impact on the social and democratic questions of our times • To publish papers demonstrating the highest standards of scholarship in sociology from authors worldwide; • To carry papers from across the full range of sociological research and knowledge • To lead debate on key methodological and theoretical questions and controversies in contemporary sociology, for example through the annual lecture special issue • To highlight new areas of sociological research, new developments in sociological theory, and new methodological innovations, for example through timely special sections and special issues • To react quickly to major publishing and/or world events by producing special issues and/or sections • To publish the best work from scholars in new and emerging regions where sociology is developing • To encourage new and aspiring sociologists to submit papers to the journal, and to spotlight their work through the early career prize • To engage with the sociological community – academics as well as students – in the UK and abroad, through social media, and a journal blog.
期刊最新文献
Lagging behind by doing good: How volunteering prolongs unemployment. The dispositif is alive! Recovering social agents in Foucauldian analysis. The social life of creative methods: Filmmaking, fabulation and recovery. Disruptive diversity: Exploring racial commodification in the Norwegian cultural field. The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1