HoloLens 耳部图像引导用于耳部重建的可行性研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004043
Dongwen Jiang, Shuang Wang, Chenhao Ma, Jinxiu Yang, Leren He
{"title":"HoloLens 耳部图像引导用于耳部重建的可行性研究。","authors":"Dongwen Jiang, Shuang Wang, Chenhao Ma, Jinxiu Yang, Leren He","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An ideal 3D cartilage framework and accurate anatomical location are the most important factors to carry out a satisfactory reconstruction of the ear. To streamline this process, we developed an augmented reality assistance system, HoloLens Ear Image Guidance, which is based on computed tomography (CT) data, tailor-made navigation kits to guide reconstruction, data processing software, and HoloLens hardware. The objective of this study is to verify its feasibility in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study first validated our system in healthy controls and then extrapolated data to test on patients with microtia. First, three healthy volunteers were recruited, and reconstructive navigation kits were made using 3D printing. CT data were collected for the head and neck and imported into the HoloLens Ear Image Guidance Application to generate a personalized 3D virtual ear image. Volunteers then wore the navigation kits while researchers observed them through the HoloLens to check accuracy, track delay, and view the ear image guide.Ten patients with unilateral microtia were recruited and CT data were collected, and reconstructive navigation kits were made to assist with surgery. The procedure was monitored to record the surgeon's experience wearing the HoloLens, the patients' complications associated with wearing navigation kit, and to measure the symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the reference counterpart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In control patients, the deviation between the virtual image and the real ear was less than 2.4% (±0.22%); the tracking delay was less than 1.26 s (±0.09 s), the display effect was good, and surgeons did not report discomfort or dizziness while wearing the HoloLens. Volunteers did not report any pain from holding the navigation reference in their mouth during the test. Following validation, the HoloLens-assisted procedures were not associated with surgeon discomfort or dizziness. No complications were noted in patients including injury to the oral mucosa. Symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the contralateral ear was noted to be satisfactory in HoloLens-assisted surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HoloLens Ear Image Guidance initially met clinical demands in registration accuracy, tracking speed, and subjective user experience, which can be used as the basis for continual software improvements and clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Feasibility Study of HoloLens Ear Image Guidance for Ear Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Dongwen Jiang, Shuang Wang, Chenhao Ma, Jinxiu Yang, Leren He\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An ideal 3D cartilage framework and accurate anatomical location are the most important factors to carry out a satisfactory reconstruction of the ear. To streamline this process, we developed an augmented reality assistance system, HoloLens Ear Image Guidance, which is based on computed tomography (CT) data, tailor-made navigation kits to guide reconstruction, data processing software, and HoloLens hardware. The objective of this study is to verify its feasibility in a clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study first validated our system in healthy controls and then extrapolated data to test on patients with microtia. First, three healthy volunteers were recruited, and reconstructive navigation kits were made using 3D printing. CT data were collected for the head and neck and imported into the HoloLens Ear Image Guidance Application to generate a personalized 3D virtual ear image. Volunteers then wore the navigation kits while researchers observed them through the HoloLens to check accuracy, track delay, and view the ear image guide.Ten patients with unilateral microtia were recruited and CT data were collected, and reconstructive navigation kits were made to assist with surgery. The procedure was monitored to record the surgeon's experience wearing the HoloLens, the patients' complications associated with wearing navigation kit, and to measure the symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the reference counterpart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In control patients, the deviation between the virtual image and the real ear was less than 2.4% (±0.22%); the tracking delay was less than 1.26 s (±0.09 s), the display effect was good, and surgeons did not report discomfort or dizziness while wearing the HoloLens. Volunteers did not report any pain from holding the navigation reference in their mouth during the test. Following validation, the HoloLens-assisted procedures were not associated with surgeon discomfort or dizziness. No complications were noted in patients including injury to the oral mucosa. Symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the contralateral ear was noted to be satisfactory in HoloLens-assisted surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HoloLens Ear Image Guidance initially met clinical demands in registration accuracy, tracking speed, and subjective user experience, which can be used as the basis for continual software improvements and clinical application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004043\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:理想的三维软骨框架和准确的解剖位置是进行令人满意的耳部重建的最重要因素。为了简化这一过程,我们开发了一种增强现实辅助系统 HoloLens Ear Image Guidance,它基于计算机断层扫描(CT)数据、指导重建的定制导航套件、数据处理软件和 HoloLens 硬件。本研究的目的是验证其在临床环境中的可行性:本研究首先在健康对照组中验证了我们的系统,然后推断数据,对小耳症患者进行测试。首先,招募了三名健康志愿者,并使用三维打印技术制作了重建导航套件。收集头部和颈部的 CT 数据并导入 HoloLens 耳朵图像引导应用程序,生成个性化的三维虚拟耳朵图像。然后,志愿者佩戴导航套件,研究人员通过 HoloLens 对其进行观察,以检查准确性、跟踪延迟并查看耳部图像引导。研究人员招募了 10 名单侧小耳症患者,收集了 CT 数据,并制作了重建导航套件以协助手术。对手术过程进行监控,记录外科医生佩戴 HoloLens 的体验、患者佩戴导航套件的相关并发症,并测量重建耳与参照物之间的对称性:在对照组患者中,虚拟图像与真实耳朵之间的偏差小于 2.4%(±0.22%);追踪延迟小于 1.26 秒(±0.09 秒),显示效果良好,外科医生在佩戴 HoloLens 时未感到不适或眩晕。在测试过程中,志愿者也没有报告因口中含着导航参照物而感到疼痛。经过验证,HoloLens 辅助手术并未引起外科医生不适或头晕。患者没有出现口腔粘膜损伤等并发症。在 HoloLens 辅助手术中,重建的耳朵与对侧耳朵的对称性令人满意:HoloLens耳部图像引导系统在注册准确性、跟踪速度和用户主观体验方面初步满足了临床需求,可作为软件持续改进和临床应用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Feasibility Study of HoloLens Ear Image Guidance for Ear Reconstruction.

Background: An ideal 3D cartilage framework and accurate anatomical location are the most important factors to carry out a satisfactory reconstruction of the ear. To streamline this process, we developed an augmented reality assistance system, HoloLens Ear Image Guidance, which is based on computed tomography (CT) data, tailor-made navigation kits to guide reconstruction, data processing software, and HoloLens hardware. The objective of this study is to verify its feasibility in a clinical setting.

Methods: This study first validated our system in healthy controls and then extrapolated data to test on patients with microtia. First, three healthy volunteers were recruited, and reconstructive navigation kits were made using 3D printing. CT data were collected for the head and neck and imported into the HoloLens Ear Image Guidance Application to generate a personalized 3D virtual ear image. Volunteers then wore the navigation kits while researchers observed them through the HoloLens to check accuracy, track delay, and view the ear image guide.Ten patients with unilateral microtia were recruited and CT data were collected, and reconstructive navigation kits were made to assist with surgery. The procedure was monitored to record the surgeon's experience wearing the HoloLens, the patients' complications associated with wearing navigation kit, and to measure the symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the reference counterpart.

Results: In control patients, the deviation between the virtual image and the real ear was less than 2.4% (±0.22%); the tracking delay was less than 1.26 s (±0.09 s), the display effect was good, and surgeons did not report discomfort or dizziness while wearing the HoloLens. Volunteers did not report any pain from holding the navigation reference in their mouth during the test. Following validation, the HoloLens-assisted procedures were not associated with surgeon discomfort or dizziness. No complications were noted in patients including injury to the oral mucosa. Symmetry between the reconstructed ear and the contralateral ear was noted to be satisfactory in HoloLens-assisted surgery.

Conclusions: The HoloLens Ear Image Guidance initially met clinical demands in registration accuracy, tracking speed, and subjective user experience, which can be used as the basis for continual software improvements and clinical application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Application Discrepancies in the 2023-2024 Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Facial Artery Branch Thrombolysis for Nasal Vascular Embolism Induced by Hyaluronic Acid Injection. Management of Delayed Vascular Occlusion in Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Literature and Case Report. Management of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cannulation-Associated Groin Wound Complications With Muscle Flaps at a High-Acuity Cardiac Referral Center. Micro/Nanobubble-Assisted Lipotransfer: In Vivo Evidence of Improved Graft Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1