食源性病原体对源自牛奶的乳酸菌上清液的易感性:一项全面的元回归研究。

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Foods Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.3390/foods13162635
Nathália Fernandes, Yara Loforte, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron
{"title":"食源性病原体对源自牛奶的乳酸菌上清液的易感性:一项全面的元回归研究。","authors":"Nathália Fernandes, Yara Loforte, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron","doi":"10.3390/foods13162635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>L. monocytogenes</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the <i>Enterococcus</i> genus displayed the highest inhibition values against <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas <i>Lacticaseibacillus</i> strains were more effective against <i>S. aureus</i> (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for <i>L. monocytogenes, Salmonella</i> spp., and <i>S. aureus</i>, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>S. aureus</i>; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of Foodborne Pathogens to Milk-Origin Lactic Acid Bacteria Supernatants: A Comprehensive Meta-Regression Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nathália Fernandes, Yara Loforte, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/foods13162635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>L. monocytogenes</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the <i>Enterococcus</i> genus displayed the highest inhibition values against <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas <i>Lacticaseibacillus</i> strains were more effective against <i>S. aureus</i> (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for <i>L. monocytogenes, Salmonella</i> spp., and <i>S. aureus</i>, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>S. aureus</i>; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析汇编了乳酸菌(LAB)上清液对乳制品中三种常见致病菌的体外抗菌功效:沙门氏菌属、单核细胞增多性乳酸杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。通过在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行搜索,对论文全文进行筛选和分析后,有 39 项研究被认为是相关的,共记录了 510 项观察结果。通过调整三个病原体特异性元回归模型,评估了调节因子对抑制直径的影响。结果表明,一般来说,肠球菌属菌株对单核细胞增多性乳腺炎的抑制值最高(15.90 ± 2.138 mm),而乳酸杆菌属菌株对金黄色葡萄球菌的抑制效果更好(11.89 ± 0.573 mm)。井扩散试验优于点扩散试验和盘扩散试验,酸性更强的 LAB 上清液可测得更高的抑制直径(p < 0.001)。包含 LAB 菌属、病原体浓度和培养时间的元回归模型分别解释了单核细胞增多性酵母菌、沙门氏菌属和金黄色葡萄球菌抑菌直径总方差的 33.8%、52.3% 和 19.8%。这三个模型均未显示发表偏倚的证据。这项元回归研究表明,乳制品中的 LAB 菌株对三种食源性致病菌的抑制能力各不相同。总体而言,单核细胞增生酵母菌比沙门氏菌属和金黄色葡萄球菌表现出更大的易感性;因此,可利用所选 LAB 菌株的抗菌能力来制定奶酪制作的生物控制策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Susceptibility of Foodborne Pathogens to Milk-Origin Lactic Acid Bacteria Supernatants: A Comprehensive Meta-Regression Study.

This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the Enterococcus genus displayed the highest inhibition values against L. monocytogenes (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas Lacticaseibacillus strains were more effective against S. aureus (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (p < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and S. aureus, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, L. monocytogenes was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than Salmonella spp. and S. aureus; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
期刊最新文献
A Candy Defect Detection Method Based on StyleGAN2 and Improved YOLOv7 for Imbalanced Data. Accelerated Life Testing of Biodegradable Starch Films with Nanoclay Using the Elongation Level as a Stressor. Detection of Mycotoxin Contamination in Foods Using Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Detection of Veterinary Drugs in Food Using a Portable Mass Spectrometer Coupled with Solid-Phase Microextraction Arrow. Effect of Shikimic Acid on Oxidation of Myofibrillar Protein of Duck Meat During Heat Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1