{"title":"食源性病原体对源自牛奶的乳酸菌上清液的易感性:一项全面的元回归研究。","authors":"Nathália Fernandes, Yara Loforte, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron","doi":"10.3390/foods13162635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>L. monocytogenes</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the <i>Enterococcus</i> genus displayed the highest inhibition values against <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas <i>Lacticaseibacillus</i> strains were more effective against <i>S. aureus</i> (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for <i>L. monocytogenes, Salmonella</i> spp., and <i>S. aureus</i>, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>S. aureus</i>; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of Foodborne Pathogens to Milk-Origin Lactic Acid Bacteria Supernatants: A Comprehensive Meta-Regression Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nathália Fernandes, Yara Loforte, Vasco Cadavez, Ursula Gonzales-Barron\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/foods13162635\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>L. monocytogenes</i>, and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the <i>Enterococcus</i> genus displayed the highest inhibition values against <i>L. monocytogenes</i> (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas <i>Lacticaseibacillus</i> strains were more effective against <i>S. aureus</i> (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for <i>L. monocytogenes, Salmonella</i> spp., and <i>S. aureus</i>, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, <i>L. monocytogenes</i> was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than <i>Salmonella</i> spp. and <i>S. aureus</i>; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foods\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162635\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13162635","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Susceptibility of Foodborne Pathogens to Milk-Origin Lactic Acid Bacteria Supernatants: A Comprehensive Meta-Regression Study.
This systematic review and meta-analysis compile the in vitro antimicrobial efficacy of lactic acid bacteria (LAB) supernatants against three common pathogenic bacteria found in dairy products: Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus. After screening and analysis of full papers, identified by searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, thirty-nine studies were regarded as relevant, and a total of 510 observations were recorded. The effects of moderators on inhibition diameters were assessed by adjusting three pathogen-specific meta-regression models. Results showed that, in general terms, strains from the Enterococcus genus displayed the highest inhibition values against L. monocytogenes (15.90 ± 2.138 mm), whereas Lacticaseibacillus strains were more effective against S. aureus (11.89 ± 0.573 mm). The well diffusion test outperformed the spot and disk diffusion tests, and more acidic LAB supernatants resulted in higher measurements of inhibition diameters (p < 0.001). Meta-regression models incorporating LAB genus, pathogen concentration, and incubation time explained 33.8%, 52.3%, and 19.8% of the total variance in inhibition diameters for L. monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., and S. aureus, respectively. None of the three models showed evidence of publication bias. This meta-regression study demonstrated that LAB strains present in dairy products possess a variable capacity to inhibit any of the three foodborne pathogens. Overall, L. monocytogenes was found to exhibit greater susceptibility than Salmonella spp. and S. aureus; thus, the antilisterial capacity of the selected LAB strains could be exploited in developing biocontrol strategies for cheese-making.
期刊介绍:
Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed
electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material
we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds