Shaza Bishti, Martin Homa, Stefan Wolfart, Taskin Tuna
{"title":"粘性食物对种植体支撑的单颗修复体的拉脱力:体外研究","authors":"Shaza Bishti, Martin Homa, Stefan Wolfart, Taskin Tuna","doi":"10.1111/clr.14355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo investigate the pull‐off forces on implant‐supported restorations caused by sticky food, to understand how much retention force cemented restorations must have to withstand chewing forces without unintentional retention loss. The influence of food type, restoration design, and surface treatment were investigated.Material and MethodsMonolithic implant‐supported CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated and divided into groups according to their design: no (NC), flat (FC) and high cusps (HC) and subdivided according to surface roughness: rough (r) and smooth (s) (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10/group). NC represented the control group. The crowns were fixed in a universal testing machine opposite to each other. Four sticky foods (caramel, fruit jelly, candy strips and licorice) and a resin crown remover were tested. These were heated (36.4°C), placed between the crowns and compressed, then tensile strength tests were performed. The maximum pull‐off force was recorded (Newton [N]). Statistical analysis was performed using 3‐way ANOVA.ResultsThe highest mean pull‐off force among food samples was with caramel_HC_r (12.09 ± 1.26 N), whereas the lowest was with licorice_FC_s (3.21 ± 0.15 N). For the resin crown remover, a mean pull‐off force of 55.41 ± 3.87 N was measured in the HC_r group. Both food type and crown design showed a significant influence on pull‐off force (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), whereas no significant effect was reported with different surface roughnesses (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.344).ConclusionThis study reported pull‐off forces of up to 20 N between all‐ceramic restorations caused by sticky food. The clinical implication of these findings is that a cemented implant‐restoration must have a minimum retention force of 20 N to withstand unintentional displacement during function.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pull‐Off Forces on Implant‐Supported Single Restorations by Sticky Food: An In Vitro Study\",\"authors\":\"Shaza Bishti, Martin Homa, Stefan Wolfart, Taskin Tuna\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectiveTo investigate the pull‐off forces on implant‐supported restorations caused by sticky food, to understand how much retention force cemented restorations must have to withstand chewing forces without unintentional retention loss. The influence of food type, restoration design, and surface treatment were investigated.Material and MethodsMonolithic implant‐supported CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated and divided into groups according to their design: no (NC), flat (FC) and high cusps (HC) and subdivided according to surface roughness: rough (r) and smooth (s) (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10/group). NC represented the control group. The crowns were fixed in a universal testing machine opposite to each other. Four sticky foods (caramel, fruit jelly, candy strips and licorice) and a resin crown remover were tested. These were heated (36.4°C), placed between the crowns and compressed, then tensile strength tests were performed. The maximum pull‐off force was recorded (Newton [N]). Statistical analysis was performed using 3‐way ANOVA.ResultsThe highest mean pull‐off force among food samples was with caramel_HC_r (12.09 ± 1.26 N), whereas the lowest was with licorice_FC_s (3.21 ± 0.15 N). For the resin crown remover, a mean pull‐off force of 55.41 ± 3.87 N was measured in the HC_r group. Both food type and crown design showed a significant influence on pull‐off force (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.001), whereas no significant effect was reported with different surface roughnesses (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.344).ConclusionThis study reported pull‐off forces of up to 20 N between all‐ceramic restorations caused by sticky food. The clinical implication of these findings is that a cemented implant‐restoration must have a minimum retention force of 20 N to withstand unintentional displacement during function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14355\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14355","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pull‐Off Forces on Implant‐Supported Single Restorations by Sticky Food: An In Vitro Study
ObjectiveTo investigate the pull‐off forces on implant‐supported restorations caused by sticky food, to understand how much retention force cemented restorations must have to withstand chewing forces without unintentional retention loss. The influence of food type, restoration design, and surface treatment were investigated.Material and MethodsMonolithic implant‐supported CAD/CAM zirconia crowns were fabricated and divided into groups according to their design: no (NC), flat (FC) and high cusps (HC) and subdivided according to surface roughness: rough (r) and smooth (s) (n = 10/group). NC represented the control group. The crowns were fixed in a universal testing machine opposite to each other. Four sticky foods (caramel, fruit jelly, candy strips and licorice) and a resin crown remover were tested. These were heated (36.4°C), placed between the crowns and compressed, then tensile strength tests were performed. The maximum pull‐off force was recorded (Newton [N]). Statistical analysis was performed using 3‐way ANOVA.ResultsThe highest mean pull‐off force among food samples was with caramel_HC_r (12.09 ± 1.26 N), whereas the lowest was with licorice_FC_s (3.21 ± 0.15 N). For the resin crown remover, a mean pull‐off force of 55.41 ± 3.87 N was measured in the HC_r group. Both food type and crown design showed a significant influence on pull‐off force (p < 0.001), whereas no significant effect was reported with different surface roughnesses (p = 0.344).ConclusionThis study reported pull‐off forces of up to 20 N between all‐ceramic restorations caused by sticky food. The clinical implication of these findings is that a cemented implant‐restoration must have a minimum retention force of 20 N to withstand unintentional displacement during function.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.