{"title":"比利时多数人对移民文化适应的期望:以人为本、针对具体领域的方法","authors":"Katrín Árnadóttir, Cecil Meeusen","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The current research employed a person-centered and domain-specific approach to examine Belgian majority group members’ expectations regarding immigrant acculturation in private and public domains, utilizing a large-scale national probability sample. Applying latent profile analysis, we identified three expectation profiles: The largest profile consisted of people who made a clear distinction between the public and private domain, expecting assimilation to Belgian culture in public but favoring immigrants maintaining their heritage culture in private (public-private division profile, 58.7%). People in the remaining two profiles held similar expectations across domains, either expecting assimilation (‘assimilation’ profile, 13.2%) or favoring integration of Belgian culture and immigrant’s heritage culture (‘integration’ profile, 28.1%). Subsequent multinomial logistic regression revealed that the profiles differed in perceived symbolic threat, with those in the integration profile feeling the least, and those in the assimilation profile most threatened. Moreover, those in the integration profile were more likely to have intergroup friends than those in the assimilation profile, and they supported religious expression in public more. Our findings illustrate the value of employing a simultaneous person-centered and domain-specific approach. In the absence of our person-centered approach, we might have captured only an overall preference for adoption in public and maintenance in private, which proves to not hold true for all participants. Conversely, had we only examined the public domain, we might have concluded that over 70% strongly expect assimilation. Taken together, we thus encourage researchers to adopt both a person-centered and domain-specific approach when examining acculturation attitudes and expectations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 102038"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Majority expectations regarding immigrant acculturation in Belgium: A person-centered, domain-specific approach\",\"authors\":\"Katrín Árnadóttir, Cecil Meeusen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The current research employed a person-centered and domain-specific approach to examine Belgian majority group members’ expectations regarding immigrant acculturation in private and public domains, utilizing a large-scale national probability sample. Applying latent profile analysis, we identified three expectation profiles: The largest profile consisted of people who made a clear distinction between the public and private domain, expecting assimilation to Belgian culture in public but favoring immigrants maintaining their heritage culture in private (public-private division profile, 58.7%). People in the remaining two profiles held similar expectations across domains, either expecting assimilation (‘assimilation’ profile, 13.2%) or favoring integration of Belgian culture and immigrant’s heritage culture (‘integration’ profile, 28.1%). Subsequent multinomial logistic regression revealed that the profiles differed in perceived symbolic threat, with those in the integration profile feeling the least, and those in the assimilation profile most threatened. Moreover, those in the integration profile were more likely to have intergroup friends than those in the assimilation profile, and they supported religious expression in public more. Our findings illustrate the value of employing a simultaneous person-centered and domain-specific approach. In the absence of our person-centered approach, we might have captured only an overall preference for adoption in public and maintenance in private, which proves to not hold true for all participants. Conversely, had we only examined the public domain, we might have concluded that over 70% strongly expect assimilation. Taken together, we thus encourage researchers to adopt both a person-centered and domain-specific approach when examining acculturation attitudes and expectations.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"volume\":\"102 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Intercultural Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014717672400107X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014717672400107X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Majority expectations regarding immigrant acculturation in Belgium: A person-centered, domain-specific approach
The current research employed a person-centered and domain-specific approach to examine Belgian majority group members’ expectations regarding immigrant acculturation in private and public domains, utilizing a large-scale national probability sample. Applying latent profile analysis, we identified three expectation profiles: The largest profile consisted of people who made a clear distinction between the public and private domain, expecting assimilation to Belgian culture in public but favoring immigrants maintaining their heritage culture in private (public-private division profile, 58.7%). People in the remaining two profiles held similar expectations across domains, either expecting assimilation (‘assimilation’ profile, 13.2%) or favoring integration of Belgian culture and immigrant’s heritage culture (‘integration’ profile, 28.1%). Subsequent multinomial logistic regression revealed that the profiles differed in perceived symbolic threat, with those in the integration profile feeling the least, and those in the assimilation profile most threatened. Moreover, those in the integration profile were more likely to have intergroup friends than those in the assimilation profile, and they supported religious expression in public more. Our findings illustrate the value of employing a simultaneous person-centered and domain-specific approach. In the absence of our person-centered approach, we might have captured only an overall preference for adoption in public and maintenance in private, which proves to not hold true for all participants. Conversely, had we only examined the public domain, we might have concluded that over 70% strongly expect assimilation. Taken together, we thus encourage researchers to adopt both a person-centered and domain-specific approach when examining acculturation attitudes and expectations.
期刊介绍:
IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.