音乐能改变轻度等长运动时的心率和心理反应,但不能改变肌肉活化状态

IF 2.3 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine and Health Science Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.008
Andrew R. Moore , Jasmin C. Hutchinson , Christa Winter , Paul C. Dalton , Lori A. Bolgla , Vincent J. Paolone
{"title":"音乐能改变轻度等长运动时的心率和心理反应,但不能改变肌肉活化状态","authors":"Andrew R. Moore ,&nbsp;Jasmin C. Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Christa Winter ,&nbsp;Paul C. Dalton ,&nbsp;Lori A. Bolgla ,&nbsp;Vincent J. Paolone","doi":"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Listening to music manipulates attention to be more externally focused, which has the potential to improve muscular efficiency. This study aimed to determine the effect of listening to music on muscle activation during an isometric exercise task, and compare this effect to those of other attentional focus conditions. Apparently healthy subjects (<em>n</em> = ​35; 16 men/19 women) completed an isometric elbow flexion task for 1 ​min in three randomized and counterbalanced conditions: internal focus (INT), external focus with a simple distraction task (EXT), or listening to music (MUS). Muscle activation of the biceps and triceps brachii and heart rate (HR) were recorded throughout the exercise tasks. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective valence, and motivation were measured at the end of each trial. There was no difference in muscle activation measures among the three conditions. HR during MUS was lower than EXT at 15 ​s ([89.4 ​± ​11.8] beats/min vs. [93.1 ​± ​12.9] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.018) and 30 ​s ([90.6 ​± ​12.4] beats/min vs. [94.2 ​± ​12.5] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.026), and lower than INT at 60 ​s ([93.3 ​± ​13.3] beats/min vs. [96.7 ​± ​12.0] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.016). Overall RPE was higher for INT (13.4 ​± ​2.2) than for MUS ([12.6 ​± ​2.0]; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.020) and EXT ([11.94 ​± ​2.22]; <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). Affective valence was higher for MUS than for INT ([2.7 ​± ​1.4] vs. [2.1 ​± ​1.5]; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.011). Manipulating attentional focus did not alter muscle activation for a light-intensity isometric muscular endurance task, though MUS was reported as more positive and requiring less exertion to complete than INT. Using music can therefore be recommended during light-intensity isometric exercise based on the psychological benefits observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33620,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","volume":"6 4","pages":"Pages 394-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000088/pdfft?md5=47a49e15acab2e3457acc2f5e44c6f78&pid=1-s2.0-S2666337624000088-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music alters heart rate and psychological responses but not muscle activation during light-intensity isometric exercise\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R. Moore ,&nbsp;Jasmin C. Hutchinson ,&nbsp;Christa Winter ,&nbsp;Paul C. Dalton ,&nbsp;Lori A. Bolgla ,&nbsp;Vincent J. Paolone\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.smhs.2024.01.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Listening to music manipulates attention to be more externally focused, which has the potential to improve muscular efficiency. This study aimed to determine the effect of listening to music on muscle activation during an isometric exercise task, and compare this effect to those of other attentional focus conditions. Apparently healthy subjects (<em>n</em> = ​35; 16 men/19 women) completed an isometric elbow flexion task for 1 ​min in three randomized and counterbalanced conditions: internal focus (INT), external focus with a simple distraction task (EXT), or listening to music (MUS). Muscle activation of the biceps and triceps brachii and heart rate (HR) were recorded throughout the exercise tasks. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective valence, and motivation were measured at the end of each trial. There was no difference in muscle activation measures among the three conditions. HR during MUS was lower than EXT at 15 ​s ([89.4 ​± ​11.8] beats/min vs. [93.1 ​± ​12.9] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.018) and 30 ​s ([90.6 ​± ​12.4] beats/min vs. [94.2 ​± ​12.5] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.026), and lower than INT at 60 ​s ([93.3 ​± ​13.3] beats/min vs. [96.7 ​± ​12.0] beats/min; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.016). Overall RPE was higher for INT (13.4 ​± ​2.2) than for MUS ([12.6 ​± ​2.0]; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.020) and EXT ([11.94 ​± ​2.22]; <em>p</em> ​&lt; ​0.001). Affective valence was higher for MUS than for INT ([2.7 ​± ​1.4] vs. [2.1 ​± ​1.5]; <em>p</em> ​= ​0.011). Manipulating attentional focus did not alter muscle activation for a light-intensity isometric muscular endurance task, though MUS was reported as more positive and requiring less exertion to complete than INT. Using music can therefore be recommended during light-intensity isometric exercise based on the psychological benefits observed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 394-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000088/pdfft?md5=47a49e15acab2e3457acc2f5e44c6f78&pid=1-s2.0-S2666337624000088-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine and Health Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine and Health Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666337624000088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

听音乐能使注意力更加集中于外部,从而有可能提高肌肉效率。本研究旨在确定听音乐对等长运动任务中肌肉激活的影响,并将这种影响与其他注意力集中条件下的影响进行比较。身体健康的受试者(n = 35;16 名男性/19 名女性)在三种随机且平衡的条件下完成了 1 分钟的肘关节等长屈伸任务:内部集中注意力(INT)、外部集中注意力并完成简单的分散注意力任务(EXT)或聆听音乐(MUS)。在整个运动任务过程中记录肱二头肌和肱三头肌的肌肉激活情况以及心率(HR)。每次试验结束时都会测量感知用力评分(RPE)、情绪和动机。三种条件下的肌肉激活测量结果没有差异。在 15 秒([89.4 ± 11.8] 次/分钟 vs. [93.1 ± 12.9] 次/分钟;p = 0.018)和 30 秒([90.6 ± 12.4] 次/分钟 vs. [94.2 ± 12.5] 次/分钟;p = 0.026)和 60 秒([93.3 ± 13.3] 次/分钟 vs. [96.7 ± 12.0] 次/分钟;p = 0.016)时,MUS 期间的心率低于 EXT。INT 的总体 RPE(13.4 ± 2.2)高于 MUS([12.6 ± 2.0];p = 0.020)和 EXT([11.94 ± 2.22];p < 0.001)。MUS 的情感价位高于 INT([2.7 ± 1.4] vs. [2.1 ± 1.5];p = 0.011)。在轻强度等长肌肉耐力任务中,操纵注意力焦点并不会改变肌肉激活,但与 INT 相比,MUS 被认为更积极,完成任务所需的体力也更少。因此,基于所观察到的心理益处,建议在轻强度等长运动中使用音乐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Music alters heart rate and psychological responses but not muscle activation during light-intensity isometric exercise

Listening to music manipulates attention to be more externally focused, which has the potential to improve muscular efficiency. This study aimed to determine the effect of listening to music on muscle activation during an isometric exercise task, and compare this effect to those of other attentional focus conditions. Apparently healthy subjects (n = ​35; 16 men/19 women) completed an isometric elbow flexion task for 1 ​min in three randomized and counterbalanced conditions: internal focus (INT), external focus with a simple distraction task (EXT), or listening to music (MUS). Muscle activation of the biceps and triceps brachii and heart rate (HR) were recorded throughout the exercise tasks. Ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective valence, and motivation were measured at the end of each trial. There was no difference in muscle activation measures among the three conditions. HR during MUS was lower than EXT at 15 ​s ([89.4 ​± ​11.8] beats/min vs. [93.1 ​± ​12.9] beats/min; p ​= ​0.018) and 30 ​s ([90.6 ​± ​12.4] beats/min vs. [94.2 ​± ​12.5] beats/min; p ​= ​0.026), and lower than INT at 60 ​s ([93.3 ​± ​13.3] beats/min vs. [96.7 ​± ​12.0] beats/min; p ​= ​0.016). Overall RPE was higher for INT (13.4 ​± ​2.2) than for MUS ([12.6 ​± ​2.0]; p ​= ​0.020) and EXT ([11.94 ​± ​2.22]; p ​< ​0.001). Affective valence was higher for MUS than for INT ([2.7 ​± ​1.4] vs. [2.1 ​± ​1.5]; p ​= ​0.011). Manipulating attentional focus did not alter muscle activation for a light-intensity isometric muscular endurance task, though MUS was reported as more positive and requiring less exertion to complete than INT. Using music can therefore be recommended during light-intensity isometric exercise based on the psychological benefits observed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine and Health Science
Sports Medicine and Health Science Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
55 days
期刊最新文献
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cardiovascular health in sedentary and athletes: Consensus, uncertainties, and ways for mitigation The effects of prolonged sitting behavior on resting-state brain functional connectivity in college students post-COVID-19 rehabilitation: A study based on fNIRS technology Effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system: A mendelian randomization study Relationship between infection, physical and mental health and exercise habits of some Chinese residents after recovery from COVID-19 Changes in physical activity and sleep following the COVID-19 pandemic on a university campus: Perception versus reality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1