降雨预测机器学习模型的比较分析

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106340
Pritee Krishna Das, Rajiv Lochan Sahu, Prakash Chandra Swain
{"title":"降雨预测机器学习模型的比较分析","authors":"Pritee Krishna Das,&nbsp;Rajiv Lochan Sahu,&nbsp;Prakash Chandra Swain","doi":"10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Predicting rainfall is essential for many applications, including agriculture, hydrology, and disaster management. In this work, we undertake a comparison examination of various machine learning models to forecast rainfall based on meteorological data. The target variable in this study is rainfall, and the dataset used includes characteristics like temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. The following seven machine learning models were assessed: Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), Random Forest Regression, and Deep Neural Network with Historical Data (DWFH), Haar Wavelet Function, Decision Tree and Discrete wavelet Transform (DWT). Data preprocessing, which includes standardisation and lagging to capture temporal dependencies, comes first in the analysis phase. A wavelet transformation is also used to capture complex patterns in the data. Each model is tested on a different test set after being trained on a subset of the dataset. The results are assessed using the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE), focusing on the RMSE and MSE values for better comparison across models. Our findings reveal that the DWFH model achieved an RMSE of 0.0138807 mm and MSE of 0.000193 mm<sup>2</sup>, demonstrating their effectiveness in predicting rainfall. The Random Forest and SVR models also provided competitive results. This study highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate machine learning model for rainfall prediction and the significance of preprocessing techniques in improving model performance. These insights can aid decision-makers in choosing the most suitable model for their specific application, contributing to more accurate rainfall predictions and enhanced decision support systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","volume":"264 ","pages":"Article 106340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of machine learning models for rainfall prediction\",\"authors\":\"Pritee Krishna Das,&nbsp;Rajiv Lochan Sahu,&nbsp;Prakash Chandra Swain\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jastp.2024.106340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Predicting rainfall is essential for many applications, including agriculture, hydrology, and disaster management. In this work, we undertake a comparison examination of various machine learning models to forecast rainfall based on meteorological data. The target variable in this study is rainfall, and the dataset used includes characteristics like temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. The following seven machine learning models were assessed: Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), Random Forest Regression, and Deep Neural Network with Historical Data (DWFH), Haar Wavelet Function, Decision Tree and Discrete wavelet Transform (DWT). Data preprocessing, which includes standardisation and lagging to capture temporal dependencies, comes first in the analysis phase. A wavelet transformation is also used to capture complex patterns in the data. Each model is tested on a different test set after being trained on a subset of the dataset. The results are assessed using the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE), focusing on the RMSE and MSE values for better comparison across models. Our findings reveal that the DWFH model achieved an RMSE of 0.0138807 mm and MSE of 0.000193 mm<sup>2</sup>, demonstrating their effectiveness in predicting rainfall. The Random Forest and SVR models also provided competitive results. This study highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate machine learning model for rainfall prediction and the significance of preprocessing techniques in improving model performance. These insights can aid decision-makers in choosing the most suitable model for their specific application, contributing to more accurate rainfall predictions and enhanced decision support systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"volume\":\"264 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624001688\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364682624001688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测降雨量对农业、水文和灾害管理等许多应用都至关重要。在这项工作中,我们对基于气象数据预测降雨的各种机器学习模型进行了比较研究。本研究的目标变量是降雨量,使用的数据集包括温度、相对湿度、风速和风向等特征。对以下七个机器学习模型进行了评估:支持向量回归(SVR)、多变量自适应回归样条(MARS)、随机森林回归、带历史数据的深度神经网络(DWFH)、哈小波函数、决策树和离散小波变换(DWT)。在分析阶段,首先要进行数据预处理,包括标准化和滞后处理,以捕捉时间依赖性。小波变换也用于捕捉数据中的复杂模式。每个模型在数据集的一个子集上进行训练后,在不同的测试集上进行测试。使用均方根误差(RMSE)和均方误差(MSE)对结果进行评估,重点关注 RMSE 和 MSE 值,以便更好地比较不同模型。我们的研究结果表明,DWFH 模型的 RMSE 为 0.0138807 毫米,MSE 为 0.000193 平方毫米,这表明它们在预测降雨量方面非常有效。随机森林和 SVR 模型也提供了有竞争力的结果。这项研究强调了选择合适的机器学习模型进行降雨预测的重要性,以及预处理技术对提高模型性能的重要意义。这些见解可以帮助决策者为其特定应用选择最合适的模型,从而提高降雨预测的准确性并增强决策支持系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of machine learning models for rainfall prediction

Predicting rainfall is essential for many applications, including agriculture, hydrology, and disaster management. In this work, we undertake a comparison examination of various machine learning models to forecast rainfall based on meteorological data. The target variable in this study is rainfall, and the dataset used includes characteristics like temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction. The following seven machine learning models were assessed: Support Vector Regression (SVR), Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), Random Forest Regression, and Deep Neural Network with Historical Data (DWFH), Haar Wavelet Function, Decision Tree and Discrete wavelet Transform (DWT). Data preprocessing, which includes standardisation and lagging to capture temporal dependencies, comes first in the analysis phase. A wavelet transformation is also used to capture complex patterns in the data. Each model is tested on a different test set after being trained on a subset of the dataset. The results are assessed using the Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Squared Error (MSE), focusing on the RMSE and MSE values for better comparison across models. Our findings reveal that the DWFH model achieved an RMSE of 0.0138807 mm and MSE of 0.000193 mm2, demonstrating their effectiveness in predicting rainfall. The Random Forest and SVR models also provided competitive results. This study highlights the importance of selecting an appropriate machine learning model for rainfall prediction and the significance of preprocessing techniques in improving model performance. These insights can aid decision-makers in choosing the most suitable model for their specific application, contributing to more accurate rainfall predictions and enhanced decision support systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
95
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics (JASTP) is an international journal concerned with the inter-disciplinary science of the Earth''s atmospheric and space environment, especially the highly varied and highly variable physical phenomena that occur in this natural laboratory and the processes that couple them. The journal covers the physical processes operating in the troposphere, stratosphere, mesosphere, thermosphere, ionosphere, magnetosphere, the Sun, interplanetary medium, and heliosphere. Phenomena occurring in other "spheres", solar influences on climate, and supporting laboratory measurements are also considered. The journal deals especially with the coupling between the different regions. Solar flares, coronal mass ejections, and other energetic events on the Sun create interesting and important perturbations in the near-Earth space environment. The physics of such "space weather" is central to the Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics and the journal welcomes papers that lead in the direction of a predictive understanding of the coupled system. Regarding the upper atmosphere, the subjects of aeronomy, geomagnetism and geoelectricity, auroral phenomena, radio wave propagation, and plasma instabilities, are examples within the broad field of solar-terrestrial physics which emphasise the energy exchange between the solar wind, the magnetospheric and ionospheric plasmas, and the neutral gas. In the lower atmosphere, topics covered range from mesoscale to global scale dynamics, to atmospheric electricity, lightning and its effects, and to anthropogenic changes.
期刊最新文献
Simulation and projection of photovoltaic energy potential over a tropical region using CMIP6 models Development of Land Use Regression (LUR) models and high-resolution spatial mapping of criteria air pollutants: Leveraging Delhi's continuous air monitoring network and remote sensing data Variability of ENSO teleconnections indices, and its impacts on moroccan agriculture Characterization of gravity wave events detected in the low ionosphere at the Brazilian Antarctic Station Comparative assessment of empirical random forest family's model in simulating future streamflow in different basin of Sarawak, Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1