食用青香蕉和菠萝纤维粉对宿主肠道微生物群的影响

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1437645
Chun Wie Chong, Mei Shan Liew, Weitze Ooi, Hassan Jamil, Angie Lim, Suet Li Hooi, Clarisse S C Tay, Gwendoline Tan
{"title":"食用青香蕉和菠萝纤维粉对宿主肠道微生物群的影响","authors":"Chun Wie Chong, Mei Shan Liew, Weitze Ooi, Hassan Jamil, Angie Lim, Suet Li Hooi, Clarisse S C Tay, Gwendoline Tan","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1437645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether green banana powder (GBP) and pineapple fibre powder (PFP) promote beneficial bacterial species, directly improve human gut health and modulate the gut microbiome and understand their utility as functional foods and dietary supplements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 14 days, 60 adults followed protocol requirements, completed food diaries and study questionnaires, avoided consuming supplements with prebiotics, probiotics or postbiotics, and ingested food containing 5 g of total daily fibre [placebo (10.75 g), GBP (10.75 g) or PFP (7.41 g)]. Participants' medical and baseline wellness histories, as well as stool samples, were collected at baseline, day 7 and 14. Stool DNA was processed for sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dietary fibre and resistant starches (RS) in GBP and PFP promoted temporal increases in beneficial bacteria. GBP significantly elevated 7 species (<i>F. prausnitzii</i>, <i>B. longum</i>, <i>B. bifidum</i>, <i>B. adolescentis</i>, <i>B. pseudocatenulatum</i>, <i>B. obeum</i>, and <i>R. inulinivorans</i>), while PFP enriched 6 species (<i>B. ovatus</i>, <i>B. cellulosilyticus</i>, <i>B. bifidum</i>, <i>B. intestinalis</i>, <i>R. inulinivorans</i>, and <i>E. siraeum</i>). These bacteria, found to be deficient in younger adults, were promoted by both powders. PFP benefitted both genders aged 16-23, while GBP benefitted overweight/obese individuals, including females. GBP and PFP fiber and RS improved bowel regularity and health as well as metabolism by promoting histidine, branched-chain amino acids, short-chain fatty acids, and biotin production. The additional fiber caused \"low\" bloatedness and reduced \"fairly bad\" sleep disruptions, without affecting sleep durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBP and PFP supplementation increased beneficial bacteria and metabolites, improved host gut health, and present a valuable nutritional strategy for enhancing human health.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>AMILI Institutional Review Board, Identifier 2023/0301.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378528/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of green banana and pineapple fibre powder consumption on host gut microbiome.\",\"authors\":\"Chun Wie Chong, Mei Shan Liew, Weitze Ooi, Hassan Jamil, Angie Lim, Suet Li Hooi, Clarisse S C Tay, Gwendoline Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1437645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether green banana powder (GBP) and pineapple fibre powder (PFP) promote beneficial bacterial species, directly improve human gut health and modulate the gut microbiome and understand their utility as functional foods and dietary supplements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 14 days, 60 adults followed protocol requirements, completed food diaries and study questionnaires, avoided consuming supplements with prebiotics, probiotics or postbiotics, and ingested food containing 5 g of total daily fibre [placebo (10.75 g), GBP (10.75 g) or PFP (7.41 g)]. Participants' medical and baseline wellness histories, as well as stool samples, were collected at baseline, day 7 and 14. Stool DNA was processed for sequencing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dietary fibre and resistant starches (RS) in GBP and PFP promoted temporal increases in beneficial bacteria. GBP significantly elevated 7 species (<i>F. prausnitzii</i>, <i>B. longum</i>, <i>B. bifidum</i>, <i>B. adolescentis</i>, <i>B. pseudocatenulatum</i>, <i>B. obeum</i>, and <i>R. inulinivorans</i>), while PFP enriched 6 species (<i>B. ovatus</i>, <i>B. cellulosilyticus</i>, <i>B. bifidum</i>, <i>B. intestinalis</i>, <i>R. inulinivorans</i>, and <i>E. siraeum</i>). These bacteria, found to be deficient in younger adults, were promoted by both powders. PFP benefitted both genders aged 16-23, while GBP benefitted overweight/obese individuals, including females. GBP and PFP fiber and RS improved bowel regularity and health as well as metabolism by promoting histidine, branched-chain amino acids, short-chain fatty acids, and biotin production. The additional fiber caused \\\"low\\\" bloatedness and reduced \\\"fairly bad\\\" sleep disruptions, without affecting sleep durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBP and PFP supplementation increased beneficial bacteria and metabolites, improved host gut health, and present a valuable nutritional strategy for enhancing human health.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>AMILI Institutional Review Board, Identifier 2023/0301.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378528/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1437645\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1437645","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定绿香蕉粉(GBP)和菠萝纤维粉(PFP)是否能促进有益菌种、直接改善人体肠道健康和调节肠道微生物群,并了解它们作为功能性食品和膳食补充剂的效用:在 14 天内,60 名成年人按照方案要求,填写食物日记和研究问卷,避免食用益生菌、益生菌或益后菌补充剂,并摄入每日总纤维含量为 5 克的食物[安慰剂(10.75 克)、GBP(10.75 克)或 PFP(7.41 克)]。在基线、第 7 天和第 14 天收集参与者的病史和基线健康史以及粪便样本。粪便 DNA 经处理后用于测序:结果:GBP和PFP中的膳食纤维和抗性淀粉(RS)促进了有益菌的增加。GBP 显著增加了 7 个菌种(F. prausnitzii、B. longum、B. bifidum、B. adolescentis、B. pseudocatenulatum、B. obeum 和 R. inulinivorans),而 PFP 增加了 6 个菌种(B. ovatus、B. cellulosilyticus、B. bifidum、B. intestinalis、R. inulinivorans 和 E. siraeum)。这两种粉末都能促进这些细菌的生长,而这些细菌在年轻人中是缺乏的。PFP对16-23岁的男女都有益,而GBP则对超重/肥胖者(包括女性)有益。GBP 和 PFP 纤维和 RS 通过促进组氨酸、支链氨基酸、短链脂肪酸和生物素的产生,改善了肠道的规律性和健康,并促进了新陈代谢。额外的纤维会导致 "低度 "腹胀,并减少 "相当糟糕的 "睡眠干扰,但不会影响睡眠时间:结论:补充 GBP 和 PFP 可增加有益细菌和代谢物,改善宿主肠道健康,是增强人体健康的重要营养策略:临床试验注册:AMILI 机构审查委员会,标识符 2023/0301。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of green banana and pineapple fibre powder consumption on host gut microbiome.

Purpose: To determine whether green banana powder (GBP) and pineapple fibre powder (PFP) promote beneficial bacterial species, directly improve human gut health and modulate the gut microbiome and understand their utility as functional foods and dietary supplements.

Methods: Over 14 days, 60 adults followed protocol requirements, completed food diaries and study questionnaires, avoided consuming supplements with prebiotics, probiotics or postbiotics, and ingested food containing 5 g of total daily fibre [placebo (10.75 g), GBP (10.75 g) or PFP (7.41 g)]. Participants' medical and baseline wellness histories, as well as stool samples, were collected at baseline, day 7 and 14. Stool DNA was processed for sequencing.

Results: Dietary fibre and resistant starches (RS) in GBP and PFP promoted temporal increases in beneficial bacteria. GBP significantly elevated 7 species (F. prausnitzii, B. longum, B. bifidum, B. adolescentis, B. pseudocatenulatum, B. obeum, and R. inulinivorans), while PFP enriched 6 species (B. ovatus, B. cellulosilyticus, B. bifidum, B. intestinalis, R. inulinivorans, and E. siraeum). These bacteria, found to be deficient in younger adults, were promoted by both powders. PFP benefitted both genders aged 16-23, while GBP benefitted overweight/obese individuals, including females. GBP and PFP fiber and RS improved bowel regularity and health as well as metabolism by promoting histidine, branched-chain amino acids, short-chain fatty acids, and biotin production. The additional fiber caused "low" bloatedness and reduced "fairly bad" sleep disruptions, without affecting sleep durations.

Conclusion: GBP and PFP supplementation increased beneficial bacteria and metabolites, improved host gut health, and present a valuable nutritional strategy for enhancing human health.

Clinical trial registration: AMILI Institutional Review Board, Identifier 2023/0301.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
期刊最新文献
Association between dietary antioxidant levels and diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Association between dried fruit intake and kidney function: research from univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomized studies. Association of triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators in predicting the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection. Balancing opportunity and exploitation: unpaid internships in sports nutrition. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in neurocritical patients with enteral nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1