脂蛋白与食道癌风险之间的关系:孟德尔随机研究。

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Frontiers in Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289
Jiale Cui, Rong Zhang, Lei Li
{"title":"脂蛋白与食道癌风险之间的关系:孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Jiale Cui, Rong Zhang, Lei Li","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between lipoproteins and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Cui, Rong Zhang, Lei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:食管癌(EC)每年导致约 508,000 人死亡,是癌症相关死亡率的重要原因之一。虽然以往的研究表明脂蛋白水平与食管癌风险之间存在关联,但其因果关系仍未得到探讨。本研究旨在利用孟德尔随机法(MR)调查脂蛋白与心肌梗死之间的因果关系:本研究采用孟德尔随机分析法确定脂蛋白与心肌梗死风险之间的因果效应,在多变量孟德尔随机分析法(MVMR)分析中将体重指数(BMI)作为混杂因素。进行了敏感性分析以评估结果的可靠性。单变量 MR(UVMR)分析表明,低密度脂蛋白(LDL)与心肌梗死风险呈显著的反向关系(P = 0.03;OR = 0.89;95%CI,0.73-0.98),而高密度脂蛋白(HDL)和甘油三酯则无显著关系。综合不同数据集的研究结果,低密度脂蛋白与发生心肌梗死的可能性呈明显的反向关系(p p = 0.03;OR = -0.94;95%CI,0.89-0.99),而高密度脂蛋白水平与心肌梗死的发生并没有明确的因果关系。调整体重指数后的MVMR分析证实了这些发现:结论:无论是否对体重指数进行调整,低密度脂蛋白与心肌梗死风险之间都存在明显的反向因果关系。高密度脂蛋白与心肌梗死风险没有因果关系。同时,甘油三酯与心肌梗死风险之间的因果关系很小,但在统计学上有显著意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relationship between lipoproteins and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.

Backgrounds and aims: Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).

Methods and findings: This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (p = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (p < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (p = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.

Conclusion: LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Nutrition
Frontiers in Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.00%
发文量
2891
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health. Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.
期刊最新文献
Association between dietary antioxidant levels and diabetes: a cross-sectional study. Association between dried fruit intake and kidney function: research from univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomized studies. Association of triglyceride-glucose index and its combination with obesity indicators in predicting the risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection. Balancing opportunity and exploitation: unpaid internships in sports nutrition. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for feeding intolerance in neurocritical patients with enteral nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1