{"title":"脂蛋白与食道癌风险之间的关系:孟德尔随机研究。","authors":"Jiale Cui, Rong Zhang, Lei Li","doi":"10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":12473,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377315/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationship between lipoproteins and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.\",\"authors\":\"Jiale Cui, Rong Zhang, Lei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds and aims: </strong>Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (<i>p</i> < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (<i>p</i> = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11377315/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2024.1432289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationship between lipoproteins and the risk of esophageal cancer: a Mendelian randomization study.
Backgrounds and aims: Esophageal cancer (EC) causes approximately 508,000 deaths annually, making it a significant cause of cancer-related mortality. While previous studies have suggested an association between lipoprotein levels and EC risk, the causal relationship remains unexplored. This study aims to investigate the causal link between lipoproteins and EC using Mendelian randomization (MR).
Methods and findings: This study employed MR to determine the causal effect between lipoproteins and EC risk, with body mass index (BMI) used as a confounder in multivariable MR (MVMR) analysis. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the results. Univariable MR (UVMR) analysis indicated that low-density lipoprotein (LDL) had a significant inverse association with EC risk (p = 0.03; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.73-0.98), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and triglycerides showed no significant association. In the synthesis of findings across diverse datasets, LDL maintained a notable inverse association with the likelihood of EC (p < 0.001; OR = 0.89; 95%CI, 0.84-0.94). Triglyceride levels indicated a potential trend toward an adverse correlation with EC susceptibility (p = 0.03; OR = -0.94; 95%CI, 0.89-0.99), whereas HDL levels did not establish a definitive causal link with the occurrence of EC. MVMR analysis, adjusting for BMI, confirmed these findings.
Conclusion: LDL exhibits a clear inverse causal relationship with EC risk, regardless of BMI adjustment. No causal effects were observed for HDL in relation to EC risk. Meanwhile, there is a small but statistically significant causal relationship between triglycerides and EC risk.
期刊介绍:
No subject pertains more to human life than nutrition. The aim of Frontiers in Nutrition is to integrate major scientific disciplines in this vast field in order to address the most relevant and pertinent questions and developments. Our ambition is to create an integrated podium based on original research, clinical trials, and contemporary reviews to build a reputable knowledge forum in the domains of human health, dietary behaviors, agronomy & 21st century food science. Through the recognized open-access Frontiers platform we welcome manuscripts to our dedicated sections relating to different areas in the field of nutrition with a focus on human health.
Specialty sections in Frontiers in Nutrition include, for example, Clinical Nutrition, Nutrition & Sustainable Diets, Nutrition and Food Science Technology, Nutrition Methodology, Sport & Exercise Nutrition, Food Chemistry, and Nutritional Immunology. Based on the publication of rigorous scientific research, we thrive to achieve a visible impact on the global nutrition agenda addressing the grand challenges of our time, including obesity, malnutrition, hunger, food waste, sustainability and consumer health.