美国低水分食品工业的食品安全研究和推广需求。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of food protection Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100358
Han Chen , Nathan M. Anderson , Elizabeth M. Grasso-Kelley , Linda J. Harris , Bradley P. Marks , Lindsey McGowen , Robert L. Scharff , Jeyamkondan Subbiah , Juming Tang , Felicia Wu , Yaohua Feng
{"title":"美国低水分食品工业的食品安全研究和推广需求。","authors":"Han Chen ,&nbsp;Nathan M. Anderson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Grasso-Kelley ,&nbsp;Linda J. Harris ,&nbsp;Bradley P. Marks ,&nbsp;Lindsey McGowen ,&nbsp;Robert L. Scharff ,&nbsp;Jeyamkondan Subbiah ,&nbsp;Juming Tang ,&nbsp;Felicia Wu ,&nbsp;Yaohua Feng","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Historically, low-moisture foods were considered to have minimal microbial risks. However, they have been linked to many high-profile multistate outbreaks and recalls in recent years, drawing research and extension attention to low-moisture food safety. Limited studies have assessed the food safety research and extension needs for the low-moisture food industry. The objectives of this needs assessment were to explore the food safety culture and education needs, identify the food safety challenges and data gaps, and understand the barriers to adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies in the U.S. low-moisture food industry. This needs assessment was composed of two studies. In Study 1, food safety experts from the low-moisture food industry upper management participated in online interviews and a debriefing discussion session. In Study 2, an online anonymous survey was disseminated to a different group of experts with experience in the low-moisture food industry. The qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding approaches, while the quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive analysis. Twenty-five experts participated in the studies (Study 1: <em>n</em> = 12; Study 2: <em>n</em> = 13). Common commodities that participants had worked with included nuts and seeds, spices, flour, and dried fruits and vegetables. A food safety culture conceptual framework was adapted, which included three main components: infrastructure conditions (foundation), individual’s food safety knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions; and organizational conditions (supporting pillars). Major barriers to establishing a positive food safety culture were identified to be limited resources, difficulties in risk communication, and difficulties in behavioral change. For continual improvement in food safety performance, two major themes of food safety challenges and data gaps were identified: cleaning, sanitation, and hygienic design; and pathogen reduction. Participants perceived the main barriers discouraging the low-moisture food industry from adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies were: (1) budgetary priorities, (2) operation constraints, (3) technology validation, (4) consumer acceptance, and (5) maintaining desired product characteristics such as quality and sensory functionality. The findings of this needs assessment provide guidance for the food industry, academia, and government agencies about the direction of future research and the development of targeted extension programs that might help improve food safety in the low-moisture food industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"87 10","pages":"Article 100358"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400142X/pdfft?md5=3911b84b9f3505f97f12f7b3b11d3dcf&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400142X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Safety Research and Extension Needs for the U.S. Low-Moisture Food Industry\",\"authors\":\"Han Chen ,&nbsp;Nathan M. Anderson ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Grasso-Kelley ,&nbsp;Linda J. Harris ,&nbsp;Bradley P. Marks ,&nbsp;Lindsey McGowen ,&nbsp;Robert L. Scharff ,&nbsp;Jeyamkondan Subbiah ,&nbsp;Juming Tang ,&nbsp;Felicia Wu ,&nbsp;Yaohua Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2024.100358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Historically, low-moisture foods were considered to have minimal microbial risks. However, they have been linked to many high-profile multistate outbreaks and recalls in recent years, drawing research and extension attention to low-moisture food safety. Limited studies have assessed the food safety research and extension needs for the low-moisture food industry. The objectives of this needs assessment were to explore the food safety culture and education needs, identify the food safety challenges and data gaps, and understand the barriers to adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies in the U.S. low-moisture food industry. This needs assessment was composed of two studies. In Study 1, food safety experts from the low-moisture food industry upper management participated in online interviews and a debriefing discussion session. In Study 2, an online anonymous survey was disseminated to a different group of experts with experience in the low-moisture food industry. The qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding approaches, while the quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive analysis. Twenty-five experts participated in the studies (Study 1: <em>n</em> = 12; Study 2: <em>n</em> = 13). Common commodities that participants had worked with included nuts and seeds, spices, flour, and dried fruits and vegetables. A food safety culture conceptual framework was adapted, which included three main components: infrastructure conditions (foundation), individual’s food safety knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions; and organizational conditions (supporting pillars). Major barriers to establishing a positive food safety culture were identified to be limited resources, difficulties in risk communication, and difficulties in behavioral change. For continual improvement in food safety performance, two major themes of food safety challenges and data gaps were identified: cleaning, sanitation, and hygienic design; and pathogen reduction. Participants perceived the main barriers discouraging the low-moisture food industry from adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies were: (1) budgetary priorities, (2) operation constraints, (3) technology validation, (4) consumer acceptance, and (5) maintaining desired product characteristics such as quality and sensory functionality. The findings of this needs assessment provide guidance for the food industry, academia, and government agencies about the direction of future research and the development of targeted extension programs that might help improve food safety in the low-moisture food industry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"87 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 100358\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400142X/pdfft?md5=3911b84b9f3505f97f12f7b3b11d3dcf&pid=1-s2.0-S0362028X2400142X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400142X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X2400142X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

低水分食品历来被认为微生物风险极低。然而,近年来低水分食品与许多备受瞩目的多州疫情爆发和召回事件有关,从而引起了对低水分食品安全研究和推广的关注。对低水分食品行业的食品安全研究和推广需求进行评估的研究有限。本次需求评估的目标是探索食品安全文化和教育需求,确定食品安全挑战和数据缺口,并了解美国低水分食品行业采用食品安全强化技术的障碍。需求评估由两项研究组成。在研究 1 中,来自低水分食品行业高层管理人员的食品安全专家参加了在线访谈和汇报讨论会议。在研究 2 中,向另一批具有低水分食品行业经验的专家分发了一份在线匿名调查。定性数据采用演绎和归纳编码方法进行分析,定量数据则采用描述性分析方法进行分析。25 名专家参与了研究(研究 1:12 人;研究 2:13 人)。参与者接触过的常见商品包括坚果和种子、香料、面粉以及干果和蔬菜。研究采用了食品安全文化概念框架,其中包括三个主要组成部分:基础设施条件(基础);个人的食品安全知识、态度和风险认知;以及组织条件(支持支柱)。建立积极的食品安全文化的主要障碍是资源有限、风险交流困难和行为改变困难。为持续改进食品安全绩效,确定了食品安全挑战和数据缺口的两大主题:清洁、卫生和卫生设计;以及减少病原体。与会者认为,阻碍低水分食品工业采用提高食品安全技术的主要障碍是(1) 预算优先级,(2) 操作限制,(3) 技术验证,(4) 消费者接受度,(5) 保持理想的产品特性,如质量和感官功能。此次需求评估的结果为食品行业、学术界和政府机构提供了指导,帮助他们确定未来的研究方向,并制定有针对性的推广计划,以帮助改善低水分食品行业的食品安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Food Safety Research and Extension Needs for the U.S. Low-Moisture Food Industry

Historically, low-moisture foods were considered to have minimal microbial risks. However, they have been linked to many high-profile multistate outbreaks and recalls in recent years, drawing research and extension attention to low-moisture food safety. Limited studies have assessed the food safety research and extension needs for the low-moisture food industry. The objectives of this needs assessment were to explore the food safety culture and education needs, identify the food safety challenges and data gaps, and understand the barriers to adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies in the U.S. low-moisture food industry. This needs assessment was composed of two studies. In Study 1, food safety experts from the low-moisture food industry upper management participated in online interviews and a debriefing discussion session. In Study 2, an online anonymous survey was disseminated to a different group of experts with experience in the low-moisture food industry. The qualitative data were analyzed using deductive and inductive coding approaches, while the quantitative data were analyzed via descriptive analysis. Twenty-five experts participated in the studies (Study 1: n = 12; Study 2: n = 13). Common commodities that participants had worked with included nuts and seeds, spices, flour, and dried fruits and vegetables. A food safety culture conceptual framework was adapted, which included three main components: infrastructure conditions (foundation), individual’s food safety knowledge, attitudes, and risk perceptions; and organizational conditions (supporting pillars). Major barriers to establishing a positive food safety culture were identified to be limited resources, difficulties in risk communication, and difficulties in behavioral change. For continual improvement in food safety performance, two major themes of food safety challenges and data gaps were identified: cleaning, sanitation, and hygienic design; and pathogen reduction. Participants perceived the main barriers discouraging the low-moisture food industry from adopting food-safety-enhancing technologies were: (1) budgetary priorities, (2) operation constraints, (3) technology validation, (4) consumer acceptance, and (5) maintaining desired product characteristics such as quality and sensory functionality. The findings of this needs assessment provide guidance for the food industry, academia, and government agencies about the direction of future research and the development of targeted extension programs that might help improve food safety in the low-moisture food industry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
期刊最新文献
Integration of National Chemical Hazards Monitoring, Total Diet Study and Human Biomonitoring Programmes for Food Safety Exposure Assessment in Singapore. Unexplained illnesses associated with a subscription meal service, 2022. A Bi-national Sample-Initiated Retrospective Outbreak Investigation of Listeria monocytogenes Infections in the United States and Canada Linked to Enoki Mushrooms Imported from China 2022-2023. Demographic characteristics and county-level indicators of social vulnerability in salmonellosis outbreaks linked to ground beef- United States, 2012-2018. Survival of Generic Escherichia coli on In-Field Mature and Immature Gala and Golden Delicious Apples with or without Overhead Evaporative Cooling Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1