{"title":"中国的政策激励与电动汽车应用:从政策组合的角度看","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China has emerged as a global leader in electric vehicle (EV) sales due to the government’s industrial incentive policies. However, as industrial and incentive policies undergo adjustments and the market scales up, the efficacy of mixed incentive policies in a mature market becomes increasingly relevant compared to individual policies. Drawing on comprehensive year-panel data from 275 Chinese cities during 2016 ∼ 2022, this study estimates the average, complementary, and mixed effects of EV incentive policies. Our estimates indicate a limited incentive effect of purchase subsidy policies, signaling the need for a phased withdrawal of such incentives while exploring cost-effective alternatives. Furthermore, our study highlights the intricate relationship between policy diversity and overall effectiveness, emphasizing the potential crowding-out effects observed when multiple policies are concurrently implemented in cities. The effect of policy mixes is different among cities with different sales level, income level and population density. The effect of policy mixes is better in cities with a higher sales level, an upper middle-income level, and a medium population density. These insights offer a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of EV incentives, providing valuable guidance for policymakers navigating the complexities of incentive strategies in a maturing EV market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002830/pdfft?md5=0210435ea2baf833e60601128a65659d&pid=1-s2.0-S0965856424002830-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy incentives and electric vehicle adoption in China: From a perspective of policy mixes\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tra.2024.104235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>China has emerged as a global leader in electric vehicle (EV) sales due to the government’s industrial incentive policies. However, as industrial and incentive policies undergo adjustments and the market scales up, the efficacy of mixed incentive policies in a mature market becomes increasingly relevant compared to individual policies. Drawing on comprehensive year-panel data from 275 Chinese cities during 2016 ∼ 2022, this study estimates the average, complementary, and mixed effects of EV incentive policies. Our estimates indicate a limited incentive effect of purchase subsidy policies, signaling the need for a phased withdrawal of such incentives while exploring cost-effective alternatives. Furthermore, our study highlights the intricate relationship between policy diversity and overall effectiveness, emphasizing the potential crowding-out effects observed when multiple policies are concurrently implemented in cities. The effect of policy mixes is different among cities with different sales level, income level and population density. The effect of policy mixes is better in cities with a higher sales level, an upper middle-income level, and a medium population density. These insights offer a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of EV incentives, providing valuable guidance for policymakers navigating the complexities of incentive strategies in a maturing EV market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002830/pdfft?md5=0210435ea2baf833e60601128a65659d&pid=1-s2.0-S0965856424002830-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002830\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002830","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Policy incentives and electric vehicle adoption in China: From a perspective of policy mixes
China has emerged as a global leader in electric vehicle (EV) sales due to the government’s industrial incentive policies. However, as industrial and incentive policies undergo adjustments and the market scales up, the efficacy of mixed incentive policies in a mature market becomes increasingly relevant compared to individual policies. Drawing on comprehensive year-panel data from 275 Chinese cities during 2016 ∼ 2022, this study estimates the average, complementary, and mixed effects of EV incentive policies. Our estimates indicate a limited incentive effect of purchase subsidy policies, signaling the need for a phased withdrawal of such incentives while exploring cost-effective alternatives. Furthermore, our study highlights the intricate relationship between policy diversity and overall effectiveness, emphasizing the potential crowding-out effects observed when multiple policies are concurrently implemented in cities. The effect of policy mixes is different among cities with different sales level, income level and population density. The effect of policy mixes is better in cities with a higher sales level, an upper middle-income level, and a medium population density. These insights offer a nuanced understanding of the evolving landscape of EV incentives, providing valuable guidance for policymakers navigating the complexities of incentive strategies in a maturing EV market.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions.
Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.