了解心理治疗中的无反应现象:元综合

IF 13.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Clinical Psychology Review Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102489
Bethany Carrington, Rebecca Yeates, Ciara Masterson
{"title":"了解心理治疗中的无反应现象:元综合","authors":"Bethany Carrington,&nbsp;Rebecca Yeates,&nbsp;Ciara Masterson","doi":"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is considerable research focusing on the negative outcomes of psychotherapy, however, there remains an overlooked population: those who appear to show no response after treatment. This qualitative evidence synthesis aimed to review the available literature exploring client and therapist experiences of psychotherapy nonresponse.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Seven databases were searched for studies using qualitative approaches to explore nonresponse. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and were analysed using Thematic Synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six overarching client perspective themes and 18 subthemes were identified: Hopes and fears; A difficult task; A Disconnected relationship; Staying involved; Therapy was not worth the investment and, On a trajectory for improvement. Four overarching therapist perspective themes and 10 subthemes were identified: High expectations; Experiencing a disconnect; Feeling threatened and Holding onto hope.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A model of psychotherapy nonresponse is proposed. The experience of nonresponse appears to involve both clients and therapists finding therapy difficult, experiencing problems connecting and not being open in the therapeutic relationship. Importantly, nonresponse appears not to be an absence of effects, but a range of experiences that are potentially harmful, particularly to clients. However, there were varied experiences of nonresponse, which indicates the importance of qualitative outcome measurement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48458,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 102489"},"PeriodicalIF":13.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001107/pdfft?md5=1a11aeb7718f5a70296832a71f9d15af&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001107-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding non-response in psychotherapy: A meta-synthesis\",\"authors\":\"Bethany Carrington,&nbsp;Rebecca Yeates,&nbsp;Ciara Masterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There is considerable research focusing on the negative outcomes of psychotherapy, however, there remains an overlooked population: those who appear to show no response after treatment. This qualitative evidence synthesis aimed to review the available literature exploring client and therapist experiences of psychotherapy nonresponse.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Seven databases were searched for studies using qualitative approaches to explore nonresponse. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and were analysed using Thematic Synthesis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Six overarching client perspective themes and 18 subthemes were identified: Hopes and fears; A difficult task; A Disconnected relationship; Staying involved; Therapy was not worth the investment and, On a trajectory for improvement. Four overarching therapist perspective themes and 10 subthemes were identified: High expectations; Experiencing a disconnect; Feeling threatened and Holding onto hope.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>A model of psychotherapy nonresponse is proposed. The experience of nonresponse appears to involve both clients and therapists finding therapy difficult, experiencing problems connecting and not being open in the therapeutic relationship. Importantly, nonresponse appears not to be an absence of effects, but a range of experiences that are potentially harmful, particularly to clients. However, there were varied experiences of nonresponse, which indicates the importance of qualitative outcome measurement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\"114 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102489\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001107/pdfft?md5=1a11aeb7718f5a70296832a71f9d15af&pid=1-s2.0-S0272735824001107-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001107\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272735824001107","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:有大量研究关注心理治疗的负面结果,然而,仍有一个群体被忽视了:那些在治疗后似乎没有反应的人。本定性证据综述旨在回顾现有文献,探讨客户和治疗师对心理治疗无反应的体验。结果确定了客户视角的六个总体主题和 18 个次主题:希望和恐惧;艰巨的任务;脱节的关系;保持参与;治疗不值得投资以及改善的轨迹。从治疗师的角度确定了四个总体主题和 10 个次主题:讨论提出了一个心理治疗无反应模型。不回应的经历似乎涉及到客户和治疗师都发现治疗困难,在治疗关系中遇到连接和不开放的问题。重要的是,无反应似乎并不是没有效果,而是一系列可能有害的经历,尤其是对求助者而言。然而,无反应的经历多种多样,这表明了定性结果测量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding non-response in psychotherapy: A meta-synthesis

Introduction

There is considerable research focusing on the negative outcomes of psychotherapy, however, there remains an overlooked population: those who appear to show no response after treatment. This qualitative evidence synthesis aimed to review the available literature exploring client and therapist experiences of psychotherapy nonresponse.

Method

Seven databases were searched for studies using qualitative approaches to explore nonresponse. Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria and were analysed using Thematic Synthesis.

Results

Six overarching client perspective themes and 18 subthemes were identified: Hopes and fears; A difficult task; A Disconnected relationship; Staying involved; Therapy was not worth the investment and, On a trajectory for improvement. Four overarching therapist perspective themes and 10 subthemes were identified: High expectations; Experiencing a disconnect; Feeling threatened and Holding onto hope.

Discussion

A model of psychotherapy nonresponse is proposed. The experience of nonresponse appears to involve both clients and therapists finding therapy difficult, experiencing problems connecting and not being open in the therapeutic relationship. Importantly, nonresponse appears not to be an absence of effects, but a range of experiences that are potentially harmful, particularly to clients. However, there were varied experiences of nonresponse, which indicates the importance of qualitative outcome measurement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology Review
Clinical Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
23.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology Review serves as a platform for substantial reviews addressing pertinent topics in clinical psychology. Encompassing a spectrum of issues, from psychopathology to behavior therapy, cognition to cognitive therapies, behavioral medicine to community mental health, assessment, and child development, the journal seeks cutting-edge papers that significantly contribute to advancing the science and/or practice of clinical psychology. While maintaining a primary focus on topics directly related to clinical psychology, the journal occasionally features reviews on psychophysiology, learning therapy, experimental psychopathology, and social psychology, provided they demonstrate a clear connection to research or practice in clinical psychology. Integrative literature reviews and summaries of innovative ongoing clinical research programs find a place within its pages. However, reports on individual research studies and theoretical treatises or clinical guides lacking an empirical base are deemed inappropriate for publication.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Individuals with minoritized and intersecting identities in the prevention of body image and eating disorder pathology: Grounding theoretical frameworks of resilience and risk Effect sizes of randomized-controlled studies of cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders over the past 30 years Editorial Board Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1