如何改进行动

Marilyn Pease, Mark Whitmeyer
{"title":"如何改进行动","authors":"Marilyn Pease, Mark Whitmeyer","doi":"arxiv-2408.09294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For two actions in a decision problem, a and b, each of which that produces a\nstate-dependent monetary reward, we study how to robustly make action a more\nattractive. Action a' improves upon a in this manner if the set of beliefs at\nwhich a is preferred to b is a subset of the set of beliefs at which a' is\npreferred to b, irrespective of the risk-averse agent's utility function (in\nmoney). We provide a full characterization of this relation and discuss\napplications in bilateral trade and insurance.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Make an Action Better\",\"authors\":\"Marilyn Pease, Mark Whitmeyer\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.09294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For two actions in a decision problem, a and b, each of which that produces a\\nstate-dependent monetary reward, we study how to robustly make action a more\\nattractive. Action a' improves upon a in this manner if the set of beliefs at\\nwhich a is preferred to b is a subset of the set of beliefs at which a' is\\npreferred to b, irrespective of the risk-averse agent's utility function (in\\nmoney). We provide a full characterization of this relation and discuss\\napplications in bilateral trade and insurance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于决策问题中的两个行动(a 和 b),每个行动都会产生与具体情况相关的货币奖励,我们研究如何稳健地使行动 a 更有吸引力。如果 a 比 b 更受青睐的信念集合是 a' 比 b 更受青睐的信念集合的子集,而不管风险规避者的效用函数(以金钱为单位)如何,那么行动 a' 就会以这种方式改进 a。我们对这一关系进行了全面描述,并讨论了它在双边贸易和保险中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to Make an Action Better
For two actions in a decision problem, a and b, each of which that produces a state-dependent monetary reward, we study how to robustly make action a more attractive. Action a' improves upon a in this manner if the set of beliefs at which a is preferred to b is a subset of the set of beliefs at which a' is preferred to b, irrespective of the risk-averse agent's utility function (in money). We provide a full characterization of this relation and discuss applications in bilateral trade and insurance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Expert Classification Aggregation Approximately Optimal Auctions With a Strong Bidder Beyond Rationality: Unveiling the Role of Animal Spirits and Inflation Extrapolation in Central Bank Communication of the US The Extreme Points of Fusions A Statistical Equilibrium Approach to Adam Smith's Labor Theory of Value
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1