{"title":"基于神经网络的 PET-G FFF 工艺建模:评估 MLPNN 和 RBFNN 在机械性能预测中的性能","authors":"Sourabh Anand, Manoj Kumar Satyarthi","doi":"10.1177/09544089241272752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PET-G is a versatile thermoplastic resistant to impact loading, heat, and reactivity with solvents, and witnesses wide use in the Display and Signage, Packaging, Automotive, Electronics, and Medical Industries. Customized production using conventional techniques is expensive due to the high initial setup costs associated, in such cases 3D printing may be a better choice, but predicting its behavior during 3D printing remains challenging. Therefore, the current study aims to find effective process modeling techniques to achieve desired responses. The comparison of modeling techniques like MLPNN and RBFNN has been carried out to predict the mechanical properties at selected process parameters of FFF to significantly improve the mechanical property predictions. The MLP, which had 5 input dimensions and 20 hidden units, showed a CF of 0.99918 and specificity 1. Its MSE was 2.0751. On the other hand, the RBF network, with 5 input dimensions and 20 centers had a considerably lower MSE of 0.004589 but slightly lower CF values (0.92188 and 0.93393). These findings highlight that MLP excels in precision while RBF demonstrates the accuracy of the models for predicting mechanical properties.","PeriodicalId":20552,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural network-based modeling of FFF process for PET-G: Evaluating MLPNN and RBFNN performance in mechanical property prediction\",\"authors\":\"Sourabh Anand, Manoj Kumar Satyarthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09544089241272752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PET-G is a versatile thermoplastic resistant to impact loading, heat, and reactivity with solvents, and witnesses wide use in the Display and Signage, Packaging, Automotive, Electronics, and Medical Industries. Customized production using conventional techniques is expensive due to the high initial setup costs associated, in such cases 3D printing may be a better choice, but predicting its behavior during 3D printing remains challenging. Therefore, the current study aims to find effective process modeling techniques to achieve desired responses. The comparison of modeling techniques like MLPNN and RBFNN has been carried out to predict the mechanical properties at selected process parameters of FFF to significantly improve the mechanical property predictions. The MLP, which had 5 input dimensions and 20 hidden units, showed a CF of 0.99918 and specificity 1. Its MSE was 2.0751. On the other hand, the RBF network, with 5 input dimensions and 20 centers had a considerably lower MSE of 0.004589 but slightly lower CF values (0.92188 and 0.93393). These findings highlight that MLP excels in precision while RBF demonstrates the accuracy of the models for predicting mechanical properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20552,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241272752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089241272752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neural network-based modeling of FFF process for PET-G: Evaluating MLPNN and RBFNN performance in mechanical property prediction
PET-G is a versatile thermoplastic resistant to impact loading, heat, and reactivity with solvents, and witnesses wide use in the Display and Signage, Packaging, Automotive, Electronics, and Medical Industries. Customized production using conventional techniques is expensive due to the high initial setup costs associated, in such cases 3D printing may be a better choice, but predicting its behavior during 3D printing remains challenging. Therefore, the current study aims to find effective process modeling techniques to achieve desired responses. The comparison of modeling techniques like MLPNN and RBFNN has been carried out to predict the mechanical properties at selected process parameters of FFF to significantly improve the mechanical property predictions. The MLP, which had 5 input dimensions and 20 hidden units, showed a CF of 0.99918 and specificity 1. Its MSE was 2.0751. On the other hand, the RBF network, with 5 input dimensions and 20 centers had a considerably lower MSE of 0.004589 but slightly lower CF values (0.92188 and 0.93393). These findings highlight that MLP excels in precision while RBF demonstrates the accuracy of the models for predicting mechanical properties.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed papers covering a broad area of mechanical engineering activities associated with the design and operation of process equipment.