Ilona Fridman , Carma L. Bylund , Jennifer Elston Lafata
{"title":"对社交媒体内容的信任与做出错误决定的风险:对癌症患者及其护理人员的调查","authors":"Ilona Fridman , Carma L. Bylund , Jennifer Elston Lafata","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.11, <em>p</em> < 0.01), identified as Black (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 10.19, p < 0.01), and had less education (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.86, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 1.25, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803/pdfft?md5=82ef74f7f3849ae75b456f85337061d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000803-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust of social media content and risk of making misinformed decisions: Survey of people affected by cancer and their caregivers\",\"authors\":\"Ilona Fridman , Carma L. Bylund , Jennifer Elston Lafata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.11, <em>p</em> < 0.01), identified as Black (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 10.19, p < 0.01), and had less education (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.86, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 1.25, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803/pdfft?md5=82ef74f7f3849ae75b456f85337061d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000803-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Trust of social media content and risk of making misinformed decisions: Survey of people affected by cancer and their caregivers
Background
This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.
Methods
A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.
Findings
Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (ORadj = 0.11, p < 0.01), identified as Black (ORadj = 10.19, p < 0.01), and had less education (ORadj = 0.86, p = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (ORadj = 1.25, padj = 0.01).
Discussion
Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.