对社交媒体内容的信任与做出错误决定的风险:对癌症患者及其护理人员的调查

Ilona Fridman , Carma L. Bylund , Jennifer Elston Lafata
{"title":"对社交媒体内容的信任与做出错误决定的风险:对癌症患者及其护理人员的调查","authors":"Ilona Fridman ,&nbsp;Carma L. Bylund ,&nbsp;Jennifer Elston Lafata","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.11, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), identified as Black (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 10.19, p &lt; 0.01), and had less education (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.86, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 1.25, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100332"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803/pdfft?md5=82ef74f7f3849ae75b456f85337061d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000803-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust of social media content and risk of making misinformed decisions: Survey of people affected by cancer and their caregivers\",\"authors\":\"Ilona Fridman ,&nbsp;Carma L. Bylund ,&nbsp;Jennifer Elston Lafata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.11, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), identified as Black (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 10.19, p &lt; 0.01), and had less education (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 0.86, <em>p</em> = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (OR<sub>adj</sub> = 1.25, p<sub>adj</sub> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803/pdfft?md5=82ef74f7f3849ae75b456f85337061d8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000803-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究探讨了癌症患者及其护理人员对社交媒体 (SM) 的使用情况以及对信息的信任度。我们比较了社会-人口特征,以确定哪些群体更有可能依赖社交媒体做出治疗决定,哪些群体不太愿意与他们的医疗服务提供者验证社交媒体信息。方法 2021 年 11 月至 12 月,我们通过在线调查对确诊为癌症的患者和癌症患者的照顾者进行了一项全国性调查。结果在262名受访者中,65%的人可能会使用SM来做出有关改变生活方式、癌症筛查、疫苗接种、癌症治疗、医学检测或选择医疗服务提供者的决定。SM 用户的年龄较小(ORadj = 0.11,p < 0.01),身份为黑人(ORadj = 10.19,p < 0.01),受教育程度较低(ORadj = 0.86,p = 0.02)。讨论结果有助于人们对数字鸿沟有新的认识,强调不仅需要改善数字信息的获取,还需要一个支持性的环境,为患者提供可靠的方法来验证他们所遇到的信息的真实性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trust of social media content and risk of making misinformed decisions: Survey of people affected by cancer and their caregivers

Background

This study explores social media (SM) usage and trust in information among cancer patients and their caregivers. We compare socio-demographic characteristics to identify groups more likely to rely on social media for treatment decisions and those less inclined to validate social media information with their provider.

Methods

A national survey of people diagnosed with cancer and those who were caregivers to people diagnosed with cancer was conducted via online survey in November–December 2021. Socio-demographic factors associated with respondents' use of SM and comfort disclosing SM use were assessed using logistic regression.

Findings

Out of 262 respondents, 65% were likely to use SM to make decisions about lifestyle changes, cancer screening, vaccination, cancer treatment, medical testing, or choosing a provider. SM users were younger (ORadj = 0.11, p < 0.01), identified as Black (ORadj = 10.19, p < 0.01), and had less education (ORadj = 0.86, p = 0.02). Those with less education reported not being comfortable discussing SM with their providers (ORadj = 1.25, padj = 0.01).

Discussion

Results contribute new understanding of the digital divide, highlighting the need for not only improving access to digital information but also the need for a supportive environment that provides patients with dependable methods to verify the authenticity of the information they encounter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1