T4-L1-髋轴:长结构成人脊柱畸形手术中的矢状脊柱重新对位目标:早期影响。

Jeffrey Hills,Gregory M Mundis,Eric O Klineberg,Justin S Smith,Breton Line,Jeffrey L Gum,Themistocles S Protopsaltis,D Kojo Hamilton,Alex Soroceanu,Robert Eastlack,Pierce Nunley,Khaled M Kebaish,Lawrence G Lenke,Richard A Hostin,Munish C Gupta,Han Jo Kim,Christopher P Ames,Douglas C Burton,Christopher I Shaffrey,Frank J Schwab,Virginie Lafage,Renaud Lafage,Shay Bess,Michael P Kelly,
{"title":"T4-L1-髋轴:长结构成人脊柱畸形手术中的矢状脊柱重新对位目标:早期影响。","authors":"Jeffrey Hills,Gregory M Mundis,Eric O Klineberg,Justin S Smith,Breton Line,Jeffrey L Gum,Themistocles S Protopsaltis,D Kojo Hamilton,Alex Soroceanu,Robert Eastlack,Pierce Nunley,Khaled M Kebaish,Lawrence G Lenke,Richard A Hostin,Munish C Gupta,Han Jo Kim,Christopher P Ames,Douglas C Burton,Christopher I Shaffrey,Frank J Schwab,Virginie Lafage,Renaud Lafage,Shay Bess,Michael P Kelly,","doi":"10.2106/jbjs.23.00372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nOur understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":22625,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Hills,Gregory M Mundis,Eric O Klineberg,Justin S Smith,Breton Line,Jeffrey L Gum,Themistocles S Protopsaltis,D Kojo Hamilton,Alex Soroceanu,Robert Eastlack,Pierce Nunley,Khaled M Kebaish,Lawrence G Lenke,Richard A Hostin,Munish C Gupta,Han Jo Kim,Christopher P Ames,Douglas C Burton,Christopher I Shaffrey,Frank J Schwab,Virginie Lafage,Renaud Lafage,Shay Bess,Michael P Kelly,\",\"doi\":\"10.2106/jbjs.23.00372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nOur understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThe median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nWe defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures.\\r\\n\\r\\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\\r\\nTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.00372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.23.00372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景我们对矢状对齐与机械并发症之间关系的认识正在不断发展。在正常脊柱中,L1-骨盆角(L1PA)决定了脊柱前凸的程度和分布,并与骨盆入射角(PI)密切相关,而 T4-骨盆角(T4PA)与 L1PA 的夹角在 4° 以内。我们的目的是研究重新对齐正常 L1PA 和 T4-L1PA 错位的临床影响。方法我们查询了前瞻性多中心成人脊柱畸形登记处,以了解从 T1-T5 区域到骶骨接受固定术并接受 2 年影像学随访的患者。正常矢状线的定义与之前描述的正常脊柱相同:L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°,T4-L1PA错位 = 0°。机械性失败的定义为严重的近端交界性后凸(PJK)、移位的杆骨折,或在两年内因交界性失败、假关节或杆骨折而再次手术。多变量非线性逻辑回归被用来定义L1PA和T4-L1PA不匹配的目标范围,以最大限度地降低机械故障的风险。使用线性回归法确定了 T4PA 的变化与根据 C2-骨盆角度(C2PA)计算的整体矢状对齐变化之间的关系。最后,在调整术前评分和年龄的基础上,采用多变量回归评估术后初始 C2PA 与患者报告的 1 年预后之间的关系。结果纳入的 247 名患者的中位年龄为 64 岁(四分位间范围为 57 至 69 岁),202 名(82%)为女性。L1PA偏离正常值或T4-L1PA不匹配与机械故障的风险显著增加有关,与年龄无关。当 L1PA 为 PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°),T4-L1PA 错位在 -3° 和 +1° 之间时,风险最小。最终随访时 T4PA 和 C2PA 的变化密切相关(r2 = 0.96)。结论我们使用L1PA(相对于PI)和T4-L1PA不匹配度定义了矢状对齐目标,这两个指标在手术中均可直接修改。对于接受骶骨长融合术的患者,根据这些目标进行重新对位可能会减少机械故障。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The T4-L1-Hip Axis: Sagittal Spinal Realignment Targets in Long-Construct Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: Early Impact.
BACKGROUND Our understanding of the relationship between sagittal alignment and mechanical complications is evolving. In normal spines, the L1-pelvic angle (L1PA) accounts for the magnitude and distribution of lordosis and is strongly associated with pelvic incidence (PI), and the T4-pelvic angle (T4PA) is within 4° of the L1PA. We aimed to examine the clinical implications of realignment to a normal L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch. METHODS A prospective multicenter adult spinal deformity registry was queried for patients who underwent fixation from the T1-T5 region to the sacrum and had 2-year radiographic follow-up. Normal sagittal alignment was defined as previously described for normal spines: L1PA = PI × 0.5 - 21°, and T4-L1PA mismatch = 0°. Mechanical failure was defined as severe proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK), displaced rod fracture, or reoperation for junctional failure, pseudarthrosis, or rod fracture within 2 years. Multivariable nonlinear logistic regression was used to define target ranges for L1PA and T4-L1PA mismatch that minimized the risk of mechanical failure. The relationship between changes in T4PA and changes in global sagittal alignment according to the C2-pelvic angle (C2PA) was determined using linear regression. Lastly, multivariable regression was used to assess associations between initial postoperative C2PA and patient-reported outcomes at 1 year, adjusting for preoperative scores and age. RESULTS The median age of the 247 included patients was 64 years (interquartile range, 57 to 69 years), and 202 (82%) were female. Deviation from a normal L1PA or T4-L1PA mismatch in either direction was associated with a significantly higher risk of mechanical failure, independent of age. Risk was minimized with an L1PA of PI × 0.5 - (19° ± 2°) and T4-L1PA mismatch between -3° and +1°. Changes in T4PA and in C2PA at the time of final follow-up were strongly associated (r2 = 0.96). Higher postoperative C2PA was independently associated with more disability, more pain, and worse self-image at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS We defined sagittal alignment targets using L1PA (relative to PI) and the T4-L1PA mismatch, which are both directly modifiable during surgery. In patients undergoing long fusion to the sacrum, realignment based on these targets may lead to fewer mechanical failures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Complications of Arthroscopic Bristow or Latarjet Procedure with Screw Versus Suture-Button Fixation: A Prospective Study of 308 Consecutive Cases by a Single Surgeon. Do Half of Orthopaedic Surgeons Change Jobs within Their First 2 Years?: An Analysis Using the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. What's Important: Breaking Bread Together, Finding an Extracurricular Pursuit. Sagittal Fragment Rotation and Ogden Type-I Classification Are Hallmarks of Combined Tibial Tubercle Fracture and Patellar Tendon Injury. What's Important: Equitable Orthopaedic Care for Patients with Disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1