治疗儿童和青少年前臂远端骨折的最小干预(活动夹板或绷带):范围审查

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2024.111897
Peter J. Snelling , Peter Goodwin , Justin Clark , David Bade , Randy Bindra , Robert S. Ware , Gerben Keijzers
{"title":"治疗儿童和青少年前臂远端骨折的最小干预(活动夹板或绷带):范围审查","authors":"Peter J. Snelling ,&nbsp;Peter Goodwin ,&nbsp;Justin Clark ,&nbsp;David Bade ,&nbsp;Randy Bindra ,&nbsp;Robert S. Ware ,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Distal forearm fractures are common in children and adolescents with a spectrum of severity. There are fracture patterns that are suitable for minimal interventions, such as a splint or bandage. The objective of this review was to identify which types of paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with a removable splint or bandage.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A scoping review was performed. Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL; two trial registries were also searched. All primary study designs with children &lt;18 years of age with a distal forearm fracture that was managed in either a splint or bandage were included. Quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two eligible articles were included from 20 unique studies: 12 randomised controlled trials, seven cohort studies and a case report. Twelve studies focused solely on buckle/torus fractures, with remaining studies including other fracture types, such as incomplete (‘greenstick’), complete (‘transverse’), or physeal (Salter-Harris). Twelve studies reported that participants with either bandage or splint had appropriate reduction in pain and recovery of function at completion of follow-up for all fracture types. All 20 studies reported minimal adverse events related to fracture management. One study reported worsening angulation with bandage immobilisation for complete fractures in two participants, which required manipulation under anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There is high quality evidence to support the safety and effectiveness of a splint or bandage for treatment of distal radius buckle and non-displaced incomplete fractures. Several studies supported the use of minimal interventions for various distal radius cortical breach fracture types, with good outcomes, but were limited by heterogeneity (methodology, interventions, outcome measures, reference standard) and potential bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Included studies confirmed the inherent stability of buckle fractures. The current literature gap to support minimal interventions for a range of other paediatric distal forearm fracture types was highlighted. High-quality evidence with well-designed, large, multicentre randomised control trials in defined age groups is required to identify which paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with either a removable splint or bandage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"55 11","pages":"Article 111897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006260/pdfft?md5=1832b30dc447ca45f5d63d85973f4b0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0020138324006260-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal intervention (removable splint or bandage) for the management of distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents: A scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Peter J. Snelling ,&nbsp;Peter Goodwin ,&nbsp;Justin Clark ,&nbsp;David Bade ,&nbsp;Randy Bindra ,&nbsp;Robert S. Ware ,&nbsp;Gerben Keijzers\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2024.111897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Distal forearm fractures are common in children and adolescents with a spectrum of severity. There are fracture patterns that are suitable for minimal interventions, such as a splint or bandage. The objective of this review was to identify which types of paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with a removable splint or bandage.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A scoping review was performed. Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL; two trial registries were also searched. All primary study designs with children &lt;18 years of age with a distal forearm fracture that was managed in either a splint or bandage were included. Quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two eligible articles were included from 20 unique studies: 12 randomised controlled trials, seven cohort studies and a case report. Twelve studies focused solely on buckle/torus fractures, with remaining studies including other fracture types, such as incomplete (‘greenstick’), complete (‘transverse’), or physeal (Salter-Harris). Twelve studies reported that participants with either bandage or splint had appropriate reduction in pain and recovery of function at completion of follow-up for all fracture types. All 20 studies reported minimal adverse events related to fracture management. One study reported worsening angulation with bandage immobilisation for complete fractures in two participants, which required manipulation under anaesthesia.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>There is high quality evidence to support the safety and effectiveness of a splint or bandage for treatment of distal radius buckle and non-displaced incomplete fractures. Several studies supported the use of minimal interventions for various distal radius cortical breach fracture types, with good outcomes, but were limited by heterogeneity (methodology, interventions, outcome measures, reference standard) and potential bias.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Included studies confirmed the inherent stability of buckle fractures. The current literature gap to support minimal interventions for a range of other paediatric distal forearm fracture types was highlighted. High-quality evidence with well-designed, large, multicentre randomised control trials in defined age groups is required to identify which paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with either a removable splint or bandage.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"55 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 111897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006260/pdfft?md5=1832b30dc447ca45f5d63d85973f4b0f&pid=1-s2.0-S0020138324006260-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138324006260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言前臂远端骨折在儿童和青少年中很常见,严重程度不一。有些骨折类型适合使用夹板或绷带等最小干预措施。本综述旨在确定哪些类型的儿科前臂远端骨折可以使用可移动夹板或绷带进行安全有效的处理。检索的数据库包括 PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library 和 CINAHL;还检索了两个试验登记处。所有涉及 18 岁儿童前臂远端骨折并使用夹板或绷带处理的主要研究设计均被纳入。采用 GRADE 工具确定证据质量:其中包括 12 项随机对照试验、7 项队列研究和 1 项病例报告。12 项研究仅关注带扣/蝶骨骨折,其余研究包括其他骨折类型,如不完全骨折("绿棒")、完全骨折("横向")或趾骨骨折(Salter-Harris)。有 12 项研究报告称,在完成所有骨折类型的随访后,使用绷带或夹板的受试者都能适当减轻疼痛并恢复功能。所有 20 项研究均报告称,与骨折处理相关的不良事件极少。讨论有高质量的证据支持夹板或绷带治疗桡骨远端带锁骨折和非移位不完全骨折的安全性和有效性。有几项研究支持对不同类型的桡骨远端皮质破损骨折使用最低限度的干预措施,并取得了良好的疗效,但受到异质性(方法学、干预措施、结果测量、参考标准)和潜在偏倚的限制。结论所纳入的研究证实了扣带式骨折的固有稳定性,并强调了目前在支持对一系列其他儿科前臂远端骨折类型进行最小干预方面存在的文献空白。要确定哪些儿科前臂远端骨折可通过可移动夹板或绷带进行安全有效的处理,需要在确定的年龄组中进行设计良好的大型多中心随机对照试验,以获得高质量的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimal intervention (removable splint or bandage) for the management of distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents: A scoping review

Introduction

Distal forearm fractures are common in children and adolescents with a spectrum of severity. There are fracture patterns that are suitable for minimal interventions, such as a splint or bandage. The objective of this review was to identify which types of paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with a removable splint or bandage.

Materials and methods

A scoping review was performed. Databases searched were PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library and CINAHL; two trial registries were also searched. All primary study designs with children <18 years of age with a distal forearm fracture that was managed in either a splint or bandage were included. Quality of evidence was determined using the GRADE tool.

Results

Twenty-two eligible articles were included from 20 unique studies: 12 randomised controlled trials, seven cohort studies and a case report. Twelve studies focused solely on buckle/torus fractures, with remaining studies including other fracture types, such as incomplete (‘greenstick’), complete (‘transverse’), or physeal (Salter-Harris). Twelve studies reported that participants with either bandage or splint had appropriate reduction in pain and recovery of function at completion of follow-up for all fracture types. All 20 studies reported minimal adverse events related to fracture management. One study reported worsening angulation with bandage immobilisation for complete fractures in two participants, which required manipulation under anaesthesia.

Discussion

There is high quality evidence to support the safety and effectiveness of a splint or bandage for treatment of distal radius buckle and non-displaced incomplete fractures. Several studies supported the use of minimal interventions for various distal radius cortical breach fracture types, with good outcomes, but were limited by heterogeneity (methodology, interventions, outcome measures, reference standard) and potential bias.

Conclusions

Included studies confirmed the inherent stability of buckle fractures. The current literature gap to support minimal interventions for a range of other paediatric distal forearm fracture types was highlighted. High-quality evidence with well-designed, large, multicentre randomised control trials in defined age groups is required to identify which paediatric distal forearm fractures can be safely and effectively managed with either a removable splint or bandage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
期刊最新文献
Effects of major trauma care organisation on mortality in a European level 1 trauma centre: A retrospective analysis of 2016-2023 Cost-effectiveness and budget impact of cement augmentation for the fixation of unstable trochanteric fractures from a European perspective Avoiding “a piece of paper on the wall that everyone ignores”: A qualitative study on the barriers for implementing open fracture guidelines A finite element analysis of the trapezoidal plate. How to get a stable fixation at different fracture lines? “Utility of social vulnerability index in trauma: A systematic review”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1