Seung Yong Lee , Paul Bates , Patrick Murray , Yahua Zhang
{"title":"从实施威胁和错误管理中汲取的经验教训:澳大利亚通用航空案例研究","authors":"Seung Yong Lee , Paul Bates , Patrick Murray , Yahua Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.team.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Threat and Error Management (TEM) is one of recent safety initiatives to further improve the overall aviation safety level. In response to the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for TEM to be introduced to all pilot training syllabi, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in Australia mandated TEM as an additional assessment item for various levels of flight tests and ground examinations in 2009. The current study adopted a two-pronged approach: A case study to highlight the importance of TEM training, followed by gaining an in-depth appreciation as to how TEM was implemented and its effects of the use of TEM training. A semi-structured interview of five highly experienced general aviation Flight Examiners (FE) was conducted, and thematic analysis was performed for the interview data from which four main themes emerged: 1) Impracticality; 2) Lack of guidance and support; 3) TEM implementation; and 4) TEM in practice. All participants shared the same view that TEM was not implemented well. It is expected that the findings from this study add to the body of knowledge to better inform and provide guidance and reference for National Aviation Authorities (NAA) to develop an implementation plan when considering the implementation of TEM training in their regulatory framework. Our study highlights a notable disconnect in CASA’s operational workforce’s grasp of TEM, impacting trust in the general aviation sector in its significance and application. It should be also noted that since our study, to address this and foster innovation in safety projects, CASA has initiated comprehensive strategies such as workforce planning and actively engaging in Technical Working Groups (TWGs) to harness community expertise for safety improvements. Nevertheless, the findings have the potential to provide information regarding pilot attitudes to future safety initiatives in other rapidly growing sectors such as Recreational Aviation (RA) and Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101258,"journal":{"name":"Transport Economics and Management","volume":"2 ","pages":"Pages 322-330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from the implementation of Threat and Error Management: A case study of the Australian general aviation\",\"authors\":\"Seung Yong Lee , Paul Bates , Patrick Murray , Yahua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.team.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Threat and Error Management (TEM) is one of recent safety initiatives to further improve the overall aviation safety level. In response to the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for TEM to be introduced to all pilot training syllabi, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in Australia mandated TEM as an additional assessment item for various levels of flight tests and ground examinations in 2009. The current study adopted a two-pronged approach: A case study to highlight the importance of TEM training, followed by gaining an in-depth appreciation as to how TEM was implemented and its effects of the use of TEM training. A semi-structured interview of five highly experienced general aviation Flight Examiners (FE) was conducted, and thematic analysis was performed for the interview data from which four main themes emerged: 1) Impracticality; 2) Lack of guidance and support; 3) TEM implementation; and 4) TEM in practice. All participants shared the same view that TEM was not implemented well. It is expected that the findings from this study add to the body of knowledge to better inform and provide guidance and reference for National Aviation Authorities (NAA) to develop an implementation plan when considering the implementation of TEM training in their regulatory framework. Our study highlights a notable disconnect in CASA’s operational workforce’s grasp of TEM, impacting trust in the general aviation sector in its significance and application. It should be also noted that since our study, to address this and foster innovation in safety projects, CASA has initiated comprehensive strategies such as workforce planning and actively engaging in Technical Working Groups (TWGs) to harness community expertise for safety improvements. Nevertheless, the findings have the potential to provide information regarding pilot attitudes to future safety initiatives in other rapidly growing sectors such as Recreational Aviation (RA) and Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 322-330\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899624000236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899624000236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
威胁与失误管理(TEM)是近期进一步提高整体航空安全水平的安全举措之一。为响应国际民用航空组织(ICAO)关于在所有飞行员培训大纲中引入 TEM 的建议,澳大利亚民航安全局(CASA)于 2009 年规定将 TEM 作为各级飞行测试和地面考试的附加评估项目。本研究采用了双管齐下的方法:首先进行案例研究,强调 TEM 培训的重要性,然后深入了解如何实施 TEM 以及使用 TEM 培训的效果。研究人员对五名经验丰富的通用航空飞行考试员(FE)进行了半结构化访谈,并对访谈数据进行了主题分析,从中发现了四大主题:1)不切实际;2)缺乏指导和支持;3)TEM 的实施;4)TEM 的实践。所有参与者都认为 TEM 没有得到很好的实施。我们希望本研究的结果能够为国家航空管理局(NAA)在考虑在其监管框架内实施 TEM 培训时制定实施计划提供更好的信息、指导和参考。我们的研究突出表明,CASA的业务人员对TEM的掌握明显脱节,影响了通用航空部门对其意义和应用的信任。还应该指出的是,自我们的研究以来,为了解决这一问题并促进安全项目的创新,CASA 已经启动了全面的战略,如劳动力规划和积极参与技术工作组 (TWG),以利用社区的专业知识来改善安全状况。尽管如此,研究结果仍有可能为其他快速发展的领域(如休闲航空(RA)和遥控飞机系统(RPAS))的飞行员对未来安全举措的态度提供信息。
Lessons from the implementation of Threat and Error Management: A case study of the Australian general aviation
Threat and Error Management (TEM) is one of recent safety initiatives to further improve the overall aviation safety level. In response to the recommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) for TEM to be introduced to all pilot training syllabi, the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) in Australia mandated TEM as an additional assessment item for various levels of flight tests and ground examinations in 2009. The current study adopted a two-pronged approach: A case study to highlight the importance of TEM training, followed by gaining an in-depth appreciation as to how TEM was implemented and its effects of the use of TEM training. A semi-structured interview of five highly experienced general aviation Flight Examiners (FE) was conducted, and thematic analysis was performed for the interview data from which four main themes emerged: 1) Impracticality; 2) Lack of guidance and support; 3) TEM implementation; and 4) TEM in practice. All participants shared the same view that TEM was not implemented well. It is expected that the findings from this study add to the body of knowledge to better inform and provide guidance and reference for National Aviation Authorities (NAA) to develop an implementation plan when considering the implementation of TEM training in their regulatory framework. Our study highlights a notable disconnect in CASA’s operational workforce’s grasp of TEM, impacting trust in the general aviation sector in its significance and application. It should be also noted that since our study, to address this and foster innovation in safety projects, CASA has initiated comprehensive strategies such as workforce planning and actively engaging in Technical Working Groups (TWGs) to harness community expertise for safety improvements. Nevertheless, the findings have the potential to provide information regarding pilot attitudes to future safety initiatives in other rapidly growing sectors such as Recreational Aviation (RA) and Remotely Piloted Aircraft System (RPAS).