以工人为中心,利用公理设计原则对生产任务进行评估和重新设计,以改善工效学

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-10-11 DOI:10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.001
Z. Arkouli, G. Michalos, G. Kokotinis, S. Makris
{"title":"以工人为中心,利用公理设计原则对生产任务进行评估和重新设计,以改善工效学","authors":"Z. Arkouli,&nbsp;G. Michalos,&nbsp;G. Kokotinis,&nbsp;S. Makris","doi":"10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Humans are considered the most valuable resource in manufacturing systems thanks to their craftsmanship, dexterity, and autonomy significantly affecting productivity, quality, and the overall company competitiveness. This paper introduces the SAGE (Systematic Approach to Generating Ergonomic Manufacturing tasks) methodology, a structured approach based on Axiomatic Design principles to integrate Human Factors evaluation early in the operations design phase and redesign manufacturing tasks to improve operators well-being. The primary objective is to mitigate discomfort and safety risks that often lead to musculoskeletal disorders, absenteeism, and production delays. SAGE provides a comprehensive framework for assessing ergonomic aspects of manufacturing tasks and identifying the need for redesign. It offers a detailed set of Functional Requirements (FRs) for reference, assesses FR satisfaction, evaluates task complexity using the Independence Axiom, and examines the intensity of FR satisfaction through the Information Axiom. The methodology includes specific implementation guidelines, ensuring its applicability across diverse manufacturing contexts. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through a large-scale parts assembly case study inspired by the bus and coach industrial sector, where a production engineer evaluated a windows assembly task and identified ergonomic design interventions. A comparative analysis with other relevant methods is finally presented, highlighting the approach's effectiveness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56011,"journal":{"name":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","volume":"55 ","pages":"Pages 188-209"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worker-centered evaluation and redesign of manufacturing tasks for ergonomics improvement using axiomatic design principles\",\"authors\":\"Z. Arkouli,&nbsp;G. Michalos,&nbsp;G. Kokotinis,&nbsp;S. Makris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cirpj.2024.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Humans are considered the most valuable resource in manufacturing systems thanks to their craftsmanship, dexterity, and autonomy significantly affecting productivity, quality, and the overall company competitiveness. This paper introduces the SAGE (Systematic Approach to Generating Ergonomic Manufacturing tasks) methodology, a structured approach based on Axiomatic Design principles to integrate Human Factors evaluation early in the operations design phase and redesign manufacturing tasks to improve operators well-being. The primary objective is to mitigate discomfort and safety risks that often lead to musculoskeletal disorders, absenteeism, and production delays. SAGE provides a comprehensive framework for assessing ergonomic aspects of manufacturing tasks and identifying the need for redesign. It offers a detailed set of Functional Requirements (FRs) for reference, assesses FR satisfaction, evaluates task complexity using the Independence Axiom, and examines the intensity of FR satisfaction through the Information Axiom. The methodology includes specific implementation guidelines, ensuring its applicability across diverse manufacturing contexts. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through a large-scale parts assembly case study inspired by the bus and coach industrial sector, where a production engineer evaluated a windows assembly task and identified ergonomic design interventions. A comparative analysis with other relevant methods is finally presented, highlighting the approach's effectiveness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 188-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175558172400155X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175558172400155X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人被认为是制造系统中最宝贵的资源,因为他们的手工艺、灵巧性和自主性对生产率、质量和公司整体竞争力有着重大影响。本文介绍了 SAGE(生成符合人体工程学的制造任务的系统方法)方法,这是一种基于公理设计原则的结构化方法,用于在操作设计阶段早期整合人因评估,并重新设计制造任务,以改善操作员的福祉。其主要目的是减轻经常导致肌肉骨骼疾病、旷工和生产延误的不适感和安全风险。SAGE 提供了一个全面的框架,用于评估生产任务的人体工程学方面,并确定重新设计的必要性。它提供了一套详细的功能要求(FR)供参考,评估功能要求的满意度,使用独立性公理评估任务的复杂性,并通过信息公理检查功能要求满意度的强度。该方法包括具体的实施指南,确保其适用于各种制造环境。受公共汽车和长途客车工业部门的启发,该方法通过大规模零件装配案例研究证明了其有效性,在该案例研究中,一名生产工程师评估了窗口装配任务,并确定了符合人体工程学的设计干预措施。最后还介绍了与其他相关方法的比较分析,突出了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Worker-centered evaluation and redesign of manufacturing tasks for ergonomics improvement using axiomatic design principles
Humans are considered the most valuable resource in manufacturing systems thanks to their craftsmanship, dexterity, and autonomy significantly affecting productivity, quality, and the overall company competitiveness. This paper introduces the SAGE (Systematic Approach to Generating Ergonomic Manufacturing tasks) methodology, a structured approach based on Axiomatic Design principles to integrate Human Factors evaluation early in the operations design phase and redesign manufacturing tasks to improve operators well-being. The primary objective is to mitigate discomfort and safety risks that often lead to musculoskeletal disorders, absenteeism, and production delays. SAGE provides a comprehensive framework for assessing ergonomic aspects of manufacturing tasks and identifying the need for redesign. It offers a detailed set of Functional Requirements (FRs) for reference, assesses FR satisfaction, evaluates task complexity using the Independence Axiom, and examines the intensity of FR satisfaction through the Information Axiom. The methodology includes specific implementation guidelines, ensuring its applicability across diverse manufacturing contexts. Its effectiveness is demonstrated through a large-scale parts assembly case study inspired by the bus and coach industrial sector, where a production engineer evaluated a windows assembly task and identified ergonomic design interventions. A comparative analysis with other relevant methods is finally presented, highlighting the approach's effectiveness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
166
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: The CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology (CIRP-JMST) publishes fundamental papers on manufacturing processes, production equipment and automation, product design, manufacturing systems and production organisations up to the level of the production networks, including all the related technical, human and economic factors. Preference is given to contributions describing research results whose feasibility has been demonstrated either in a laboratory or in the industrial praxis. Case studies and review papers on specific issues in manufacturing science and technology are equally encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Resilience compass navigation through manufacturing organization uncertainty – A dynamic capabilities approach using mixed methods A structured digital twinning approach to improve decision-making in manufacturing SMEs Numerical simulation of molten pool flow behavior in ultrasonic vibration-assisted gas tungsten arc welding of low-alloy high-strength steel Hybrid FE-ML model for turning of 42CrMo4 steel Study on the effect of variable laser power on residual stress distribution in laser directed energy deposition of Ti6Al4V
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1