Joshua F. Baker, George Reed, Ted R. Mikuls, Geoffrey M. Thiele, Dimitrios A. Pappas, Christina Charles‐Schoeman, Monica Guma, Leslie R. Harrold, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Joel M. Kremer
{"title":"类风湿关节炎患者的代谢综合征、脂肪因子和对先进疗法的反应","authors":"Joshua F. Baker, George Reed, Ted R. Mikuls, Geoffrey M. Thiele, Dimitrios A. Pappas, Christina Charles‐Schoeman, Monica Guma, Leslie R. Harrold, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Joel M. Kremer","doi":"10.1002/art.43034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWe determined if metabolic syndrome, its components, and adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, Fibroblast Growth Factor‐21) were associated with response to advanced therapies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis study included participants with RA initiating either TNFi or non‐TNFi biologic therapies from the <jats:italic>C</jats:italic>omparative <jats:italic>E</jats:italic>ffectiveness <jats:italic>R</jats:italic>egistry to study <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>herapies for <jats:italic>A</jats:italic>rthritis and <jats:italic>I</jats:italic>nflammatory Co<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>ditions (CERTAIN) cohort within the CorEvitas registry. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. Adipokines were assessed on stored samples from a sub‐sample of responders and non‐responders (N=200). The primary outcome was the achievement of a change as large as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at 6 months.ResultsAmong 2,368 participants, 687 (29%) had metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome was associated with lower odds of achieving CDAI MCID [OR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.56,0.86) p=0.001] with a dose‐dependent decrease in response rate according to the number of components present. Model fit was superior for metabolic syndrome compared to BMI. Associations between metabolic syndrome and MCID achievement were similar between patients receiving TNFi [OR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.49,0.87) p=0.003] v. non‐TNF therapies [OR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.55,1.04) p=0.08)] (p‐for‐interaction=0.49). Adipokines were not associated with MCID achievement.ConclusionsMetabolic syndrome is associated with lower response rates with the initiation of an advanced therapy in RA, with similar effects for both TNFi and non‐TNFi agents. Adipokines were strongly associated with metabolic syndrome but were not associated with clinical response.","PeriodicalId":129,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metabolic Syndrome, Adipokines, and Response to Advanced Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis\",\"authors\":\"Joshua F. Baker, George Reed, Ted R. Mikuls, Geoffrey M. Thiele, Dimitrios A. Pappas, Christina Charles‐Schoeman, Monica Guma, Leslie R. Harrold, Jeffrey R. Curtis, Joel M. Kremer\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.43034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeWe determined if metabolic syndrome, its components, and adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, Fibroblast Growth Factor‐21) were associated with response to advanced therapies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis study included participants with RA initiating either TNFi or non‐TNFi biologic therapies from the <jats:italic>C</jats:italic>omparative <jats:italic>E</jats:italic>ffectiveness <jats:italic>R</jats:italic>egistry to study <jats:italic>T</jats:italic>herapies for <jats:italic>A</jats:italic>rthritis and <jats:italic>I</jats:italic>nflammatory Co<jats:italic>n</jats:italic>ditions (CERTAIN) cohort within the CorEvitas registry. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. Adipokines were assessed on stored samples from a sub‐sample of responders and non‐responders (N=200). The primary outcome was the achievement of a change as large as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at 6 months.ResultsAmong 2,368 participants, 687 (29%) had metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome was associated with lower odds of achieving CDAI MCID [OR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.56,0.86) p=0.001] with a dose‐dependent decrease in response rate according to the number of components present. Model fit was superior for metabolic syndrome compared to BMI. Associations between metabolic syndrome and MCID achievement were similar between patients receiving TNFi [OR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.49,0.87) p=0.003] v. non‐TNF therapies [OR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.55,1.04) p=0.08)] (p‐for‐interaction=0.49). Adipokines were not associated with MCID achievement.ConclusionsMetabolic syndrome is associated with lower response rates with the initiation of an advanced therapy in RA, with similar effects for both TNFi and non‐TNFi agents. Adipokines were strongly associated with metabolic syndrome but were not associated with clinical response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis & Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43034\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis & Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.43034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Metabolic Syndrome, Adipokines, and Response to Advanced Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis
PurposeWe determined if metabolic syndrome, its components, and adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, Fibroblast Growth Factor‐21) were associated with response to advanced therapies among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsThis study included participants with RA initiating either TNFi or non‐TNFi biologic therapies from the Comparative Effectiveness Registry to study Therapies for Arthritis and Inflammatory Conditions (CERTAIN) cohort within the CorEvitas registry. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III definition. Adipokines were assessed on stored samples from a sub‐sample of responders and non‐responders (N=200). The primary outcome was the achievement of a change as large as the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) at 6 months.ResultsAmong 2,368 participants, 687 (29%) had metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome was associated with lower odds of achieving CDAI MCID [OR (95% CI): 0.69 (0.56,0.86) p=0.001] with a dose‐dependent decrease in response rate according to the number of components present. Model fit was superior for metabolic syndrome compared to BMI. Associations between metabolic syndrome and MCID achievement were similar between patients receiving TNFi [OR (95% CI): 0.65 (0.49,0.87) p=0.003] v. non‐TNF therapies [OR (95% CI): 0.76 (0.55,1.04) p=0.08)] (p‐for‐interaction=0.49). Adipokines were not associated with MCID achievement.ConclusionsMetabolic syndrome is associated with lower response rates with the initiation of an advanced therapy in RA, with similar effects for both TNFi and non‐TNFi agents. Adipokines were strongly associated with metabolic syndrome but were not associated with clinical response.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis & Rheumatology is the official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and focuses on the natural history, pathophysiology, treatment, and outcome of rheumatic diseases. It is a peer-reviewed publication that aims to provide the highest quality basic and clinical research in this field. The journal covers a wide range of investigative areas and also includes review articles, editorials, and educational material for researchers and clinicians. Being recognized as a leading research journal in rheumatology, Arthritis & Rheumatology serves the global community of rheumatology investigators and clinicians.