教你说 "不"--对柬埔寨金边小学教师预防儿童性虐待培训的混合方法评估。

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Child Abuse & Neglect Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107097
Swarnamala Kantipudi , Montakarn Chuemchit
{"title":"教你说 \"不\"--对柬埔寨金边小学教师预防儿童性虐待培训的混合方法评估。","authors":"Swarnamala Kantipudi ,&nbsp;Montakarn Chuemchit","doi":"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Child sexual abuse is a point of contention around the world. Protecting children from sexual abuse and ensuring primary prevention approaches has been a predominant task for LMICs. The research objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the “<em>teach to say</em>-NO” blended theory-based CSA prevention program by measuring knowledge and attitudes and analyzing the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention among primary school teachers in a school environment.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>In total, 146 primary schoolteachers from 27 public schools in Phnom Penh, Cambodia were employed. and 29 teachers were employed for the qualitative study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study was designed as a mixed-method study, consisting of a quasi-experimental study and a qualitative case study. The “<em>teach to say-NO</em>” program was delivered to intervention schoolteachers for 4 weeks. Both groups completed knowledge and attitude questionnaires at baseline, first, and second follow-up. The qualitative study was evaluated through in-depth face-to-face interviews conducted to analyze the feasibility and acceptability of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Study participants had poor knowledge on CSA and at baseline the knowledge (t = 0.72, d = 0.131) and attitude (t = −0.069, d = −0.011) scores between the intervention and comparison groups were the same. After the intervention participants demonstrated a significant improvement (p &lt; 0.05) within and between groups. The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention “teach to say-NO” themes were coded into three main areas: interest of participation, challenging factors, and benefits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest the presence of knowledge gaps concerning child sexual abuse among teachers, thus highlighting the imperative for training in this field to enhance teachers' knowledge on CSA prevention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51343,"journal":{"name":"Child Abuse & Neglect","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teach to say “NO” – A mixed methods evaluation of a child sexual abuse prevention training for primary school teachers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia\",\"authors\":\"Swarnamala Kantipudi ,&nbsp;Montakarn Chuemchit\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.107097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Child sexual abuse is a point of contention around the world. Protecting children from sexual abuse and ensuring primary prevention approaches has been a predominant task for LMICs. The research objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the “<em>teach to say</em>-NO” blended theory-based CSA prevention program by measuring knowledge and attitudes and analyzing the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention among primary school teachers in a school environment.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>In total, 146 primary schoolteachers from 27 public schools in Phnom Penh, Cambodia were employed. and 29 teachers were employed for the qualitative study.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>The study was designed as a mixed-method study, consisting of a quasi-experimental study and a qualitative case study. The “<em>teach to say-NO</em>” program was delivered to intervention schoolteachers for 4 weeks. Both groups completed knowledge and attitude questionnaires at baseline, first, and second follow-up. The qualitative study was evaluated through in-depth face-to-face interviews conducted to analyze the feasibility and acceptability of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Study participants had poor knowledge on CSA and at baseline the knowledge (t = 0.72, d = 0.131) and attitude (t = −0.069, d = −0.011) scores between the intervention and comparison groups were the same. After the intervention participants demonstrated a significant improvement (p &lt; 0.05) within and between groups. The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention “teach to say-NO” themes were coded into three main areas: interest of participation, challenging factors, and benefits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest the presence of knowledge gaps concerning child sexual abuse among teachers, thus highlighting the imperative for training in this field to enhance teachers' knowledge on CSA prevention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Abuse & Neglect\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004873\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Abuse & Neglect","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0145213424004873","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:儿童性虐待是全世界争议的焦点。保护儿童免受性虐待并确保采用初级预防方法一直是低收入和中等收入国家的主要任务。本研究的目的是评估 "教你说不 "基于混合理论的儿童性虐待预防计划的有效性,方法是测量知识和态度,分析在学校环境中对小学教师进行干预的可行性和可接受性:共有来自柬埔寨金边 27 所公立学校的 146 名小学教师参与了这项研究,其中 29 名教师参与了定性研究:研究设计为混合方法研究,包括准实验研究和定性案例研究。向干预学校的教师提供为期 4 周的 "教你说不 "计划。两组教师分别在基线、第一次和第二次随访时填写了知识和态度问卷。定性研究通过面对面的深入访谈进行评估,以分析干预措施的可行性和可接受性:干预组和对比组的基线知识(t = 0.72,d = 0.131)和态度(t = -0.069,d = -0.011)得分相同。干预后,参与者的得分有了显著提高(p 结论:干预后,参与者的得分有了显著提高:这些研究结果表明,教师在儿童性虐待方面的知识存在缺口,因此强调了在这一领域开展培训以增强教师预防儿童性虐待知识的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Teach to say “NO” – A mixed methods evaluation of a child sexual abuse prevention training for primary school teachers in Phnom Penh, Cambodia

Background and objective

Child sexual abuse is a point of contention around the world. Protecting children from sexual abuse and ensuring primary prevention approaches has been a predominant task for LMICs. The research objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the “teach to say-NO” blended theory-based CSA prevention program by measuring knowledge and attitudes and analyzing the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention among primary school teachers in a school environment.

Participants and setting

In total, 146 primary schoolteachers from 27 public schools in Phnom Penh, Cambodia were employed. and 29 teachers were employed for the qualitative study.

Method

The study was designed as a mixed-method study, consisting of a quasi-experimental study and a qualitative case study. The “teach to say-NO” program was delivered to intervention schoolteachers for 4 weeks. Both groups completed knowledge and attitude questionnaires at baseline, first, and second follow-up. The qualitative study was evaluated through in-depth face-to-face interviews conducted to analyze the feasibility and acceptability of intervention.

Results

Study participants had poor knowledge on CSA and at baseline the knowledge (t = 0.72, d = 0.131) and attitude (t = −0.069, d = −0.011) scores between the intervention and comparison groups were the same. After the intervention participants demonstrated a significant improvement (p < 0.05) within and between groups. The feasibility and acceptability of the intervention “teach to say-NO” themes were coded into three main areas: interest of participation, challenging factors, and benefits.

Conclusion

These findings suggest the presence of knowledge gaps concerning child sexual abuse among teachers, thus highlighting the imperative for training in this field to enhance teachers' knowledge on CSA prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.40%
发文量
397
期刊介绍: Official Publication of the International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect The International Journal, provides an international, multidisciplinary forum on all aspects of child abuse and neglect, with special emphasis on prevention and treatment; the scope extends further to all those aspects of life which either favor or hinder child development. While contributions will primarily be from the fields of psychology, psychiatry, social work, medicine, nursing, law enforcement, legislature, education, and anthropology, the Journal encourages the concerned lay individual and child-oriented advocate organizations to contribute.
期刊最新文献
Risk or opportunity? Child protection workers' perceptions of children's participation in the protection system. Childhood maltreatment associated with adolescent peer networks: Withdrawal, avoidance, and fragmentation The impact of refundable state earned income tax credits on foster care entry rate trends Parents differ in their sensitivity to the environment: An investigation of the relationship between socioeconomic status, social support, and child maltreatment risks Abusive head trauma: Annual medical costs for inpatient care of children managed at a single tertiary care centre in Malaysia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1