不同类型阅读障碍的执行功能。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.3390/jintelligence12100101
Irene Cadime, Bruna Rodrigues, Iolanda Ribeiro, María Teresa Martín-Aragoneses
{"title":"不同类型阅读障碍的执行功能。","authors":"Irene Cadime, Bruna Rodrigues, Iolanda Ribeiro, María Teresa Martín-Aragoneses","doi":"10.3390/jintelligence12100101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Students with reading disabilities form a heterogeneous group: some struggle with accurate and fast reading (dysfluent readers), others with comprehension (poor comprehenders), and some face challenges in both areas (poor readers). Research has indicated a link between executive functioning skills and reading performance; yet, further studies are necessary to fully understand the executive profiles in various types of reading disabilities. The goal of this study was to examine differences in executive functioning among three types of reading disabilities, comparing their performance with that of children without difficulties in either skill (typical readers). Ninety-one students from schools in Portugal participated in the study. The results reveal specific deficits in naming speed and cognitive flexibility in poor readers and dysfluent readers compared to the other groups. Additionally, poor readers exhibited significantly slower processing speed and lower working memory. However, no significant differences were observed in planning. Discriminant function analysis results indicated that the examined executive functions are better at discriminating groups with fluency deficits than those with comprehension difficulties. In conclusion, these results suggest distinct deficit patterns in executive functioning skills across different types of reading disabilities. Taking into account these findings is crucial for effective assessment and intervention with these children.</p>","PeriodicalId":52279,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligence","volume":"12 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Functioning in Different Types of Reading Disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Irene Cadime, Bruna Rodrigues, Iolanda Ribeiro, María Teresa Martín-Aragoneses\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jintelligence12100101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Students with reading disabilities form a heterogeneous group: some struggle with accurate and fast reading (dysfluent readers), others with comprehension (poor comprehenders), and some face challenges in both areas (poor readers). Research has indicated a link between executive functioning skills and reading performance; yet, further studies are necessary to fully understand the executive profiles in various types of reading disabilities. The goal of this study was to examine differences in executive functioning among three types of reading disabilities, comparing their performance with that of children without difficulties in either skill (typical readers). Ninety-one students from schools in Portugal participated in the study. The results reveal specific deficits in naming speed and cognitive flexibility in poor readers and dysfluent readers compared to the other groups. Additionally, poor readers exhibited significantly slower processing speed and lower working memory. However, no significant differences were observed in planning. Discriminant function analysis results indicated that the examined executive functions are better at discriminating groups with fluency deficits than those with comprehension difficulties. In conclusion, these results suggest distinct deficit patterns in executive functioning skills across different types of reading disabilities. Taking into account these findings is crucial for effective assessment and intervention with these children.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11508607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12100101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence12100101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有阅读障碍的学生是一个异质群体:有些学生在准确和快速阅读方面有困难(流利阅读障碍),有些学生在理解方面有困难(理解能力差),还有些学生在这两方面都面临挑战(阅读能力差)。研究表明,执行功能技能与阅读表现之间存在联系;然而,要充分了解各类阅读障碍的执行情况,还需要进一步的研究。本研究的目的是考察三种阅读障碍儿童在执行功能方面的差异,并将他们的表现与在这两种技能方面都没有困难的儿童(典型读者)进行比较。来自葡萄牙学校的 91 名学生参加了这项研究。研究结果显示,与其他组别相比,阅读能力差的学生和阅读困难的学生在命名速度和认知灵活性方面存在特殊缺陷。此外,阅读能力差的学生在处理速度和工作记忆方面也明显较慢。然而,在计划性方面没有观察到明显的差异。判别功能分析结果表明,所研究的执行功能在判别流畅性有缺陷的群体方面优于判别理解有困难的群体。总之,这些结果表明,在不同类型的阅读障碍中,执行功能的缺陷模式各不相同。考虑到这些结果对于有效评估和干预这些儿童至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Executive Functioning in Different Types of Reading Disabilities.

Students with reading disabilities form a heterogeneous group: some struggle with accurate and fast reading (dysfluent readers), others with comprehension (poor comprehenders), and some face challenges in both areas (poor readers). Research has indicated a link between executive functioning skills and reading performance; yet, further studies are necessary to fully understand the executive profiles in various types of reading disabilities. The goal of this study was to examine differences in executive functioning among three types of reading disabilities, comparing their performance with that of children without difficulties in either skill (typical readers). Ninety-one students from schools in Portugal participated in the study. The results reveal specific deficits in naming speed and cognitive flexibility in poor readers and dysfluent readers compared to the other groups. Additionally, poor readers exhibited significantly slower processing speed and lower working memory. However, no significant differences were observed in planning. Discriminant function analysis results indicated that the examined executive functions are better at discriminating groups with fluency deficits than those with comprehension difficulties. In conclusion, these results suggest distinct deficit patterns in executive functioning skills across different types of reading disabilities. Taking into account these findings is crucial for effective assessment and intervention with these children.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intelligence
Journal of Intelligence Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
17.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
An Evaluation of the Relationship Between Critical Thinking and Creative Thinking: Complementary Metacognitive Processes or Strange Bedfellows? Using Cognitive Diagnostic Models to Evaluate the Two-Process Theory of Matrix Reasoning. Cognitive Abilities and School Achievement: Addressing Challenges Across Adolescence. The Relationship Between Learning Environment Perception, Achievement Goals, and the Undergraduate Deep Learning Approach: A Longitudinal Mediation Model. Indirect Effects of Executive Planning Functions and Affectivity on the Work Ethic of University Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1