胰岛素敏感性指数与阿尔茨海默病之间的因果关系。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY Journal of Neurochemistry Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI:10.1111/jnc.16254
Fang Xu, Shiyang Wu, Shan Gao, Xuan Li, Chen Huang, Yan Chen, Ping Zhu, Guiyou Liu
{"title":"胰岛素敏感性指数与阿尔茨海默病之间的因果关系。","authors":"Fang Xu, Shiyang Wu, Shan Gao, Xuan Li, Chen Huang, Yan Chen, Ping Zhu, Guiyou Liu","doi":"10.1111/jnc.16254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence from observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies suggested that insulin resistance (IR) was associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the causal effects of different indicators of IR on AD remain inconsistent. Here, we aim to assess the causal association between the insulin sensitivity index (ISI), a measure of post-prandial IR, and the risk of AD. We first conducted primary and secondary univariable MR analyses. We selected 8 independent genome-wide significant (p < 5E-08, primary analyses) and 61 suggestive (p < 1E-05, secondary analyses) ISI genetic variants from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS; N = 53 657), respectively, and extracted their corresponding GWAS summary statistics from AD GWAS, including IGAP2019 (N = 63 926) and FinnGen_G6_AD_WIDE (N = 412 181). We selected five univariable MR methods and used heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to confirm the stability of MR estimates. Finally, we conducted a meta-analysis to combine MR estimates from two non-overlapping AD GWAS datasets. We further performed multivariable MR (MVMR) to assess the potential mediating role of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on the association between ISI and AD using two MVMR methods. In univariable MR, utilizing 8 genetic variants in primary analyses, we found a significant causal association of genetically increased ISI with decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.92, p = 0.003). Utilizing 61 genetic variants in secondary analyses, we found consistent findings of a causal effect of genetically increased ISI on the decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p = 0.003). Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis ensured the reliability of the MR estimates. In MVMR, we found no causal relationship between ISI and AD after adjusting for T2D (p > 0.05). We provide genetic evidence that increased ISI is significantly and causally associated with reduced risk of AD, which is mediated by T2D. These findings may inform prevention strategies directed toward IR-associated T2D and AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":16527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causal association between insulin sensitivity index and Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Fang Xu, Shiyang Wu, Shan Gao, Xuan Li, Chen Huang, Yan Chen, Ping Zhu, Guiyou Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jnc.16254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence from observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies suggested that insulin resistance (IR) was associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the causal effects of different indicators of IR on AD remain inconsistent. Here, we aim to assess the causal association between the insulin sensitivity index (ISI), a measure of post-prandial IR, and the risk of AD. We first conducted primary and secondary univariable MR analyses. We selected 8 independent genome-wide significant (p < 5E-08, primary analyses) and 61 suggestive (p < 1E-05, secondary analyses) ISI genetic variants from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS; N = 53 657), respectively, and extracted their corresponding GWAS summary statistics from AD GWAS, including IGAP2019 (N = 63 926) and FinnGen_G6_AD_WIDE (N = 412 181). We selected five univariable MR methods and used heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to confirm the stability of MR estimates. Finally, we conducted a meta-analysis to combine MR estimates from two non-overlapping AD GWAS datasets. We further performed multivariable MR (MVMR) to assess the potential mediating role of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on the association between ISI and AD using two MVMR methods. In univariable MR, utilizing 8 genetic variants in primary analyses, we found a significant causal association of genetically increased ISI with decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.92, p = 0.003). Utilizing 61 genetic variants in secondary analyses, we found consistent findings of a causal effect of genetically increased ISI on the decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p = 0.003). Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis ensured the reliability of the MR estimates. In MVMR, we found no causal relationship between ISI and AD after adjusting for T2D (p > 0.05). We provide genetic evidence that increased ISI is significantly and causally associated with reduced risk of AD, which is mediated by T2D. These findings may inform prevention strategies directed toward IR-associated T2D and AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurochemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16254\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.16254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

观察性研究和孟德尔随机化(MR)研究的证据表明,胰岛素抵抗(IR)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)有关。然而,不同的胰岛素抵抗指标对阿尔茨海默病的因果效应仍不一致。在此,我们旨在评估餐后胰岛素敏感性指数(ISI)与阿尔茨海默病风险之间的因果关系。我们首先进行了主要和次要的单变量 MR 分析。我们选择了 8 个独立的全基因组显著性(P 0.05)。我们提供的遗传学证据表明,ISI的增加与AD风险的降低有显著的因果关系,而AD风险的降低是由T2D介导的。这些发现可为针对与 IR 相关的 T2D 和 AD 的预防策略提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Causal association between insulin sensitivity index and Alzheimer's disease.

Evidence from observational and Mendelian randomization (MR) studies suggested that insulin resistance (IR) was associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the causal effects of different indicators of IR on AD remain inconsistent. Here, we aim to assess the causal association between the insulin sensitivity index (ISI), a measure of post-prandial IR, and the risk of AD. We first conducted primary and secondary univariable MR analyses. We selected 8 independent genome-wide significant (p < 5E-08, primary analyses) and 61 suggestive (p < 1E-05, secondary analyses) ISI genetic variants from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS; N = 53 657), respectively, and extracted their corresponding GWAS summary statistics from AD GWAS, including IGAP2019 (N = 63 926) and FinnGen_G6_AD_WIDE (N = 412 181). We selected five univariable MR methods and used heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis to confirm the stability of MR estimates. Finally, we conducted a meta-analysis to combine MR estimates from two non-overlapping AD GWAS datasets. We further performed multivariable MR (MVMR) to assess the potential mediating role of type 2 diabetes (T2D) on the association between ISI and AD using two MVMR methods. In univariable MR, utilizing 8 genetic variants in primary analyses, we found a significant causal association of genetically increased ISI with decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.68-0.92, p = 0.003). Utilizing 61 genetic variants in secondary analyses, we found consistent findings of a causal effect of genetically increased ISI on the decreased risk of AD (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.96, p = 0.003). Heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis ensured the reliability of the MR estimates. In MVMR, we found no causal relationship between ISI and AD after adjusting for T2D (p > 0.05). We provide genetic evidence that increased ISI is significantly and causally associated with reduced risk of AD, which is mediated by T2D. These findings may inform prevention strategies directed toward IR-associated T2D and AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurochemistry
Journal of Neurochemistry 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurochemistry focuses on molecular, cellular and biochemical aspects of the nervous system, the pathogenesis of neurological disorders and the development of disease specific biomarkers. It is devoted to the prompt publication of original findings of the highest scientific priority and value that provide novel mechanistic insights, represent a clear advance over previous studies and have the potential to generate exciting future research.
期刊最新文献
Causal association between insulin sensitivity index and Alzheimer's disease. Circulating medium- and long-chain acylcarnitines are associated with plasma P-tau181 in cognitively normal older adults. Cross-species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix. o1 and Gαo1/Gαo2 deletion differentially affect hippocampal mossy fiber tract anatomy and neuronal morphogenesis. Association of serum lipidomic profiles with risk of intracranial aneurysm: A Mendelian randomization study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1