针对儿童和青少年体育活动和久坐行为的参与式校本干预措施:范围综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/14034948241290854
Veerle Van Oeckel, Anneke Vandendriessche, Benedicte Deforche, Teatske Altenburg, Muguet Koobasi, Nele S Pauwels, Maïté Verloigne
{"title":"针对儿童和青少年体育活动和久坐行为的参与式校本干预措施:范围综述。","authors":"Veerle Van Oeckel, Anneke Vandendriessche, Benedicte Deforche, Teatske Altenburg, Muguet Koobasi, Nele S Pauwels, Maïté Verloigne","doi":"10.1177/14034948241290854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A significant number of children and adolescents are insufficiently physically active and have a sedentary lifestyle, which is associated with adverse health outcomes, necessitating effective interventions. Using a participatory approach, which engages youth in intervention development, may enhance intervention effectiveness, as such interventions are believed to be more tailored to the needs of the target group. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the results of process and effect evaluations of studies that developed school-based physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour interventions using a participatory approach among children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searched. Studies were included when they evaluated the participatory process, intervention implementation or health-related intervention effects. A quality assessment was completed using two QualSyst checklists. Extracted data included characteristics of studies, interventions, and participatory processes; characteristics of participants from whom data were collected; outcomes measured and measurement methods used; and key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five papers, covering 18 original studies, were included. Studies suggested that participatory processes were generally perceived positively, resulting in pupils feeling empowered, experiencing ownership and gaining certain skills. Participatory developed interventions also seemed to be generally well received, although the intervention dose delivered and intervention reach seemed to vary between studies. Finally, studies generally tended to report no effects on health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>Although a participatory approach could be promising in empowering pupils and promoting intervention acceptance, apparent differences in intervention implementation and limited effectiveness highlight the need to enhance participatory processes and intervention effectiveness.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"14034948241290854"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participatory developed school-based interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour among children and adolescents: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Veerle Van Oeckel, Anneke Vandendriessche, Benedicte Deforche, Teatske Altenburg, Muguet Koobasi, Nele S Pauwels, Maïté Verloigne\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948241290854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A significant number of children and adolescents are insufficiently physically active and have a sedentary lifestyle, which is associated with adverse health outcomes, necessitating effective interventions. Using a participatory approach, which engages youth in intervention development, may enhance intervention effectiveness, as such interventions are believed to be more tailored to the needs of the target group. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the results of process and effect evaluations of studies that developed school-based physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour interventions using a participatory approach among children and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searched. Studies were included when they evaluated the participatory process, intervention implementation or health-related intervention effects. A quality assessment was completed using two QualSyst checklists. Extracted data included characteristics of studies, interventions, and participatory processes; characteristics of participants from whom data were collected; outcomes measured and measurement methods used; and key findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five papers, covering 18 original studies, were included. Studies suggested that participatory processes were generally perceived positively, resulting in pupils feeling empowered, experiencing ownership and gaining certain skills. Participatory developed interventions also seemed to be generally well received, although the intervention dose delivered and intervention reach seemed to vary between studies. Finally, studies generally tended to report no effects on health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>Although a participatory approach could be promising in empowering pupils and promoting intervention acceptance, apparent differences in intervention implementation and limited effectiveness highlight the need to enhance participatory processes and intervention effectiveness.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"14034948241290854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241290854\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948241290854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:相当多的儿童和青少年运动量不足,生活方式久坐不动,这与不良的健康后果有关,因此有必要采取有效的干预措施。采用参与式方法,让青少年参与干预措施的制定,可能会提高干预措施的有效性,因为这种干预措施被认为更符合目标群体的需求。本范围综述旨在概述采用参与式方法对儿童和青少年进行校本体育活动和/或久坐行为干预的研究的过程和效果评估结果:方法:检索了六个数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CENTRAL(Cochrane 对照试验中央登记册)、Scopus 和 SPORTDiscus)。对参与过程、干预实施或与健康相关的干预效果进行评估的研究均被纳入其中。使用两份 QualSyst 核对表完成了质量评估。提取的数据包括研究、干预和参与过程的特点;收集数据的参与者的特点;测量的结果和使用的测量方法;以及主要结论:结果:共收录了 25 篇论文,涉及 18 项原创研究。研究结果表明,参与式教学过程一般都得到了积极的评价,使学生感到自己的能力得到了增强,体验到了主人翁精神,并获得了某些技能。参与式开发的干预措施似乎也普遍受到好评,尽管不同研究的干预剂量和干预范围似乎有所不同。最后,研究报告一般都倾向于对健康没有影响: 尽管参与式方法在增强学生能力和促进对干预措施的接受方面大有可为,但干预措施实施方面的明显差异和有限的效果突出表明,有必要加强参与过程和干预措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Participatory developed school-based interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour among children and adolescents: A scoping review.

Aims: A significant number of children and adolescents are insufficiently physically active and have a sedentary lifestyle, which is associated with adverse health outcomes, necessitating effective interventions. Using a participatory approach, which engages youth in intervention development, may enhance intervention effectiveness, as such interventions are believed to be more tailored to the needs of the target group. This scoping review aimed to provide an overview of the results of process and effect evaluations of studies that developed school-based physical activity and/or sedentary behaviour interventions using a participatory approach among children and adolescents.

Methods: Six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), Scopus and SPORTDiscus) were searched. Studies were included when they evaluated the participatory process, intervention implementation or health-related intervention effects. A quality assessment was completed using two QualSyst checklists. Extracted data included characteristics of studies, interventions, and participatory processes; characteristics of participants from whom data were collected; outcomes measured and measurement methods used; and key findings.

Results: Twenty-five papers, covering 18 original studies, were included. Studies suggested that participatory processes were generally perceived positively, resulting in pupils feeling empowered, experiencing ownership and gaining certain skills. Participatory developed interventions also seemed to be generally well received, although the intervention dose delivered and intervention reach seemed to vary between studies. Finally, studies generally tended to report no effects on health.

Conclusions: Although a participatory approach could be promising in empowering pupils and promoting intervention acceptance, apparent differences in intervention implementation and limited effectiveness highlight the need to enhance participatory processes and intervention effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
A taste of ambrosia: Do Olympic medalists live longer than Olympic losers? The diagnosis of cerebral palsy in two Danish national registries: a validation study. Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men. What is wellness? Investigating the importance of different domains of wellness among laypeople and experts: A survey study. Validation of the short version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1