Simon Ian Futerman , Yafit Cohen , Yael Laor , Eli Argaman , Shlomi Aharon , Gil Eshel
{"title":"利用无人机图像分析评估覆盖作物在耕地中减轻田间尺度碾压侵蚀的效果","authors":"Simon Ian Futerman , Yafit Cohen , Yael Laor , Eli Argaman , Shlomi Aharon , Gil Eshel","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cover crops (CC) effectively reduce soil erosion, a significant threat to farmers and the environment. Yet, there is lack of data quantifying their effect on rill erosion in the field scale. The major objective of this study was to use UAV-RGB images to estimate the effects of CC on rill erosion in the field scale and to characterize rill parameters in areas with and without CC. Images were collected from a 20-ha field in the \"Model Farm for Sustainable Agriculture\", consisting of plots with and without CC. Images were captured 33 days after CC sowing and following substantial rainfall events that formed three prominent rills. Following the elimination of vegetation pixels, structure from motion algorithm was used to generate a post-erosion digital surface model (DSM) and a baseline DSM simulating the pre-erosion soil surface (DSM <sub>reconstructed baseline)</sub>. Change-detection analysis revealed that CC significantly reduced rill erosion. Average soil loss per m<sup>2</sup> was 48 %, 58 %, and 29 % lower in CC compared to bare soil plots in the three studied rills. Additionally, rill maximum depth was 74 %, 74 %, and 24 %, and cross-sectional surface area was 67 %, 87 %, and 43 % lower in CC, compared to bare soil plots. The findings highlight CC's effectiveness in mitigating field-scale rill erosion even in their early growth stages. However, creating a DSM <sub>reconstructed baseline</sub> in CC plots is currently confined to partial CC vegetation coverage (leaving enough soil pixels visible), necessitating additional studies to determine the maximal coverage that won't compromise accuracy. Further assessments of the methods' quantitative accuracy require studies incorporating extensive ground truth data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 106341"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing field-scale rill erosion mitigation by cover crops in arable land using drone image analysis\",\"authors\":\"Simon Ian Futerman , Yafit Cohen , Yael Laor , Eli Argaman , Shlomi Aharon , Gil Eshel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106341\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cover crops (CC) effectively reduce soil erosion, a significant threat to farmers and the environment. Yet, there is lack of data quantifying their effect on rill erosion in the field scale. The major objective of this study was to use UAV-RGB images to estimate the effects of CC on rill erosion in the field scale and to characterize rill parameters in areas with and without CC. Images were collected from a 20-ha field in the \\\"Model Farm for Sustainable Agriculture\\\", consisting of plots with and without CC. Images were captured 33 days after CC sowing and following substantial rainfall events that formed three prominent rills. Following the elimination of vegetation pixels, structure from motion algorithm was used to generate a post-erosion digital surface model (DSM) and a baseline DSM simulating the pre-erosion soil surface (DSM <sub>reconstructed baseline)</sub>. Change-detection analysis revealed that CC significantly reduced rill erosion. Average soil loss per m<sup>2</sup> was 48 %, 58 %, and 29 % lower in CC compared to bare soil plots in the three studied rills. Additionally, rill maximum depth was 74 %, 74 %, and 24 %, and cross-sectional surface area was 67 %, 87 %, and 43 % lower in CC, compared to bare soil plots. The findings highlight CC's effectiveness in mitigating field-scale rill erosion even in their early growth stages. However, creating a DSM <sub>reconstructed baseline</sub> in CC plots is currently confined to partial CC vegetation coverage (leaving enough soil pixels visible), necessitating additional studies to determine the maximal coverage that won't compromise accuracy. Further assessments of the methods' quantitative accuracy require studies incorporating extensive ground truth data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003428\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198724003428","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
覆盖作物(CC)能有效减少土壤侵蚀,这对农民和环境都是一个重大威胁。然而,目前还缺乏数据来量化覆盖作物在田间尺度上对土壤流失的影响。本研究的主要目的是利用无人机 RGB 图像估算 CC 对田间尺度的辙蚀的影响,并描述有 CC 和无 CC 区域的辙蚀参数特征。图像采集自 "可持续农业示范农场 "的一块 20 公顷的田地,由有 CC 和无 CC 的地块组成。图像拍摄于 CC 播种 33 天后,在降雨量较大的情况下形成了三条明显的溪流。剔除植被像素后,使用运动结构算法生成侵蚀后数字地表模型(DSM)和模拟侵蚀前土壤表面的基线数字地表模型(DSM 重建基线)。变化检测分析表明,CC 能显著减少土壤流失。在所研究的三个溪流中,与裸露土壤地块相比,CC 每平方米的平均土壤流失量分别减少了 48%、58% 和 29%。此外,与裸露土壤地块相比,CC 地块的溪流最大深度分别减少了 74%、74% 和 24%,横截面积分别减少了 67%、87% 和 43%。这些研究结果突出表明,CC 即使在早期生长阶段也能有效减轻田间尺度的溪流侵蚀。然而,在 CC 地块创建 DSM 重建基线目前仅限于 CC 植被的部分覆盖范围(留下足够的土壤像素),因此有必要进行更多研究,以确定不会影响精度的最大覆盖范围。要进一步评估这些方法的定量准确性,需要结合大量地面实况数据进行研究。
Assessing field-scale rill erosion mitigation by cover crops in arable land using drone image analysis
Cover crops (CC) effectively reduce soil erosion, a significant threat to farmers and the environment. Yet, there is lack of data quantifying their effect on rill erosion in the field scale. The major objective of this study was to use UAV-RGB images to estimate the effects of CC on rill erosion in the field scale and to characterize rill parameters in areas with and without CC. Images were collected from a 20-ha field in the "Model Farm for Sustainable Agriculture", consisting of plots with and without CC. Images were captured 33 days after CC sowing and following substantial rainfall events that formed three prominent rills. Following the elimination of vegetation pixels, structure from motion algorithm was used to generate a post-erosion digital surface model (DSM) and a baseline DSM simulating the pre-erosion soil surface (DSM reconstructed baseline). Change-detection analysis revealed that CC significantly reduced rill erosion. Average soil loss per m2 was 48 %, 58 %, and 29 % lower in CC compared to bare soil plots in the three studied rills. Additionally, rill maximum depth was 74 %, 74 %, and 24 %, and cross-sectional surface area was 67 %, 87 %, and 43 % lower in CC, compared to bare soil plots. The findings highlight CC's effectiveness in mitigating field-scale rill erosion even in their early growth stages. However, creating a DSM reconstructed baseline in CC plots is currently confined to partial CC vegetation coverage (leaving enough soil pixels visible), necessitating additional studies to determine the maximal coverage that won't compromise accuracy. Further assessments of the methods' quantitative accuracy require studies incorporating extensive ground truth data.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.