Youngji Kwak, Jai Min Ryu, Byung Joo Chae, Jonghan Yu, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee
{"title":"拒绝手术的原位乳腺管癌或非典型性乳腺管增生患者单用他莫昔芬治疗的结果","authors":"Youngji Kwak, Jai Min Ryu, Byung Joo Chae, Jonghan Yu, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee","doi":"10.1155/2024/1805803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> Recent trends involving increased screening have led to broad populations being diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); as a result, many patients have had to receive surgery followed by standard treatment for ADH or DCIS. The common interest in reducing the use of superfluous invasive treatment has led us to question the necessity of surgical treatment for ADH or DCIS patients in a retrospective review. This work is expected to be a particularly useful reference as there have yet to be any studies describing the outcomes of initial treatment with tamoxifen without curative surgery in Korea.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes of 36 patients with DCIS or ADH diagnosis who received initial treatment with tamoxifen between 2013 and 2019 were investigated.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Among 36 patients enrolled, 30 were diagnosed with DCIS and six were diagnosed with ADH. The median age in the included cohort was 47 years old (range, 26–81 years). There was a change in the follow-up strategy including the need for surgery in 13.9% of cases. The median time to surgery in those patients was 32 months (IQR, 17.5–63.5 months). Only one patient had upgraded to a higher nuclear grade, which was a case of ADH upgrading to intermediate DCIS. Three (8.3%) of 36 patients were upstaged to an invasive disease. Of them, two patients were upstaged to microinvasive ductal carcinoma, whereas one patient was diagnosed with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The use of endocrine therapy without surgery could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with DCIS or ADH. Further validation in larger cohorts and in the context of clinical trials is needed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1805803","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Tamoxifen Treatment Alone in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who Refused Surgery\",\"authors\":\"Youngji Kwak, Jai Min Ryu, Byung Joo Chae, Jonghan Yu, Seok Won Kim, Seok Jin Nam, Jeong Eon Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/1805803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><b>Objective:</b> Recent trends involving increased screening have led to broad populations being diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); as a result, many patients have had to receive surgery followed by standard treatment for ADH or DCIS. The common interest in reducing the use of superfluous invasive treatment has led us to question the necessity of surgical treatment for ADH or DCIS patients in a retrospective review. This work is expected to be a particularly useful reference as there have yet to be any studies describing the outcomes of initial treatment with tamoxifen without curative surgery in Korea.</p>\\n <p><b>Methods:</b> The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes of 36 patients with DCIS or ADH diagnosis who received initial treatment with tamoxifen between 2013 and 2019 were investigated.</p>\\n <p><b>Results:</b> Among 36 patients enrolled, 30 were diagnosed with DCIS and six were diagnosed with ADH. The median age in the included cohort was 47 years old (range, 26–81 years). There was a change in the follow-up strategy including the need for surgery in 13.9% of cases. The median time to surgery in those patients was 32 months (IQR, 17.5–63.5 months). Only one patient had upgraded to a higher nuclear grade, which was a case of ADH upgrading to intermediate DCIS. Three (8.3%) of 36 patients were upstaged to an invasive disease. Of them, two patients were upstaged to microinvasive ductal carcinoma, whereas one patient was diagnosed with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The use of endocrine therapy without surgery could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with DCIS or ADH. Further validation in larger cohorts and in the context of clinical trials is needed.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/1805803\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1805803\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/1805803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcomes of Tamoxifen Treatment Alone in Patients With Ductal Carcinoma In Situ or Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Who Refused Surgery
Objective: Recent trends involving increased screening have led to broad populations being diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); as a result, many patients have had to receive surgery followed by standard treatment for ADH or DCIS. The common interest in reducing the use of superfluous invasive treatment has led us to question the necessity of surgical treatment for ADH or DCIS patients in a retrospective review. This work is expected to be a particularly useful reference as there have yet to be any studies describing the outcomes of initial treatment with tamoxifen without curative surgery in Korea.
Methods: The clinicopathological characteristics and oncologic outcomes of 36 patients with DCIS or ADH diagnosis who received initial treatment with tamoxifen between 2013 and 2019 were investigated.
Results: Among 36 patients enrolled, 30 were diagnosed with DCIS and six were diagnosed with ADH. The median age in the included cohort was 47 years old (range, 26–81 years). There was a change in the follow-up strategy including the need for surgery in 13.9% of cases. The median time to surgery in those patients was 32 months (IQR, 17.5–63.5 months). Only one patient had upgraded to a higher nuclear grade, which was a case of ADH upgrading to intermediate DCIS. Three (8.3%) of 36 patients were upstaged to an invasive disease. Of them, two patients were upstaged to microinvasive ductal carcinoma, whereas one patient was diagnosed with metastatic invasive ductal carcinoma.
Conclusion: The use of endocrine therapy without surgery could be a potential treatment strategy in patients with DCIS or ADH. Further validation in larger cohorts and in the context of clinical trials is needed.
期刊介绍:
IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal.
IJCP publishes:
Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed]
Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed]
''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed]
Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed]
Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion]
International scope
IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.