RLBP1 视网膜营养不良症的患者报告结果:前瞻性自然史研究中的纵向评估。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Translational Vision Science & Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1167/tvst.13.11.16
James Whelan, Jane Green, Marie Burstedt, Erin Greco, Xiao Ni, Claudio Spera, Anmol Mullins, Jean-Yves Deslandes, Zhenzhong Su, Michael Wald, Cynthia L Grosskreutz, Guillaume Normand, Arnaud Charil, Darlene Lu, Kalliopi Stasi, Karen Holopigian
{"title":"RLBP1 视网膜营养不良症的患者报告结果:前瞻性自然史研究中的纵向评估。","authors":"James Whelan, Jane Green, Marie Burstedt, Erin Greco, Xiao Ni, Claudio Spera, Anmol Mullins, Jean-Yves Deslandes, Zhenzhong Su, Michael Wald, Cynthia L Grosskreutz, Guillaume Normand, Arnaud Charil, Darlene Lu, Kalliopi Stasi, Karen Holopigian","doi":"10.1167/tvst.13.11.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of two non-disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) and the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ), in patients with retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 retinal dystrophy (RLBP1 RD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROs were assessed using the VFQ-25 and LLQ. Rasch analysis was conducted to estimate person and item measures of the VFQ-25 and LLQ questionnaires to determine the association between the two PROs. In addition, the association between these two instruments and their correlations to weighted measures of visual function and disease progression were analyzed in this three-year PRO-focused sub-study of a five-year prospective natural history study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients participated, with most of them having completed at least two PRO follow-up visits at least one year apart. The mean VFQ-25 scores were lowest for distance activities (39.2-49.0) and peripheral vision (37.5-52.4), with mean LLQ subscale scores generally low (<41), except for the emotional distress subscale. Using Rasch analysis, calibrated item and person measures along with their standard errors were estimated for both ePROs. This indicated that the distribution of the VFQ-25 and LLQ item measures well covered the distribution of person function in this group. This suggests that the item difficulties well cover the person-level performance in this population. As well, the two PROs showed a strong and significant correlation at all assessed time points as assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient (0.81, 0.91, 0.81 and 0.87 at baseline, 1/1.5, 2/2.5 (P < 0.001) and 3/3.5 years (P = 0.002)). The composite scores of both PRO questionnaires strongly correlated with clinical measures of visual function. At 2 to 2.5 years of follow-up, meaningful statistically significant declines in peripheral vision (both VFQ-25 and LLQ), distance vision (VFQ-25), and extreme lighting in dark and bright light (LLQ) subscales were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a strong association between VFQ-25 and LLQ scores and their association with clinical measures of visual function.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>PRO instruments can provide insights into the specific disabilities of this unique patient population and help to guide appropriate outcome measures for future clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":23322,"journal":{"name":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","volume":"13 11","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Reported Outcomes in RLBP1 Retinal Dystrophy: Longitudinal Assessment in a Prospective Natural History Study.\",\"authors\":\"James Whelan, Jane Green, Marie Burstedt, Erin Greco, Xiao Ni, Claudio Spera, Anmol Mullins, Jean-Yves Deslandes, Zhenzhong Su, Michael Wald, Cynthia L Grosskreutz, Guillaume Normand, Arnaud Charil, Darlene Lu, Kalliopi Stasi, Karen Holopigian\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/tvst.13.11.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the performance of two non-disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) and the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ), in patients with retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 retinal dystrophy (RLBP1 RD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PROs were assessed using the VFQ-25 and LLQ. Rasch analysis was conducted to estimate person and item measures of the VFQ-25 and LLQ questionnaires to determine the association between the two PROs. In addition, the association between these two instruments and their correlations to weighted measures of visual function and disease progression were analyzed in this three-year PRO-focused sub-study of a five-year prospective natural history study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-two patients participated, with most of them having completed at least two PRO follow-up visits at least one year apart. The mean VFQ-25 scores were lowest for distance activities (39.2-49.0) and peripheral vision (37.5-52.4), with mean LLQ subscale scores generally low (<41), except for the emotional distress subscale. Using Rasch analysis, calibrated item and person measures along with their standard errors were estimated for both ePROs. This indicated that the distribution of the VFQ-25 and LLQ item measures well covered the distribution of person function in this group. This suggests that the item difficulties well cover the person-level performance in this population. As well, the two PROs showed a strong and significant correlation at all assessed time points as assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient (0.81, 0.91, 0.81 and 0.87 at baseline, 1/1.5, 2/2.5 (P < 0.001) and 3/3.5 years (P = 0.002)). The composite scores of both PRO questionnaires strongly correlated with clinical measures of visual function. At 2 to 2.5 years of follow-up, meaningful statistically significant declines in peripheral vision (both VFQ-25 and LLQ), distance vision (VFQ-25), and extreme lighting in dark and bright light (LLQ) subscales were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated a strong association between VFQ-25 and LLQ scores and their association with clinical measures of visual function.</p><p><strong>Translational relevance: </strong>PRO instruments can provide insights into the specific disabilities of this unique patient population and help to guide appropriate outcome measures for future clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Vision Science & Technology\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572762/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Vision Science & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.11.16\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Vision Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.13.11.16","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估视网膜醛结合蛋白1视网膜营养不良症(RLBP1 RD)患者的两种非疾病特异性患者报告结果(PRO)工具,即美国国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷-25(VFQ-25)和低照度问卷(LLQ)的性能:方法: 使用 VFQ-25 和 LLQ 评估患者的 PROs。对 VFQ-25 和 LLQ 问卷的个人和项目测量进行了拉氏分析,以确定这两个 PRO 之间的关联。此外,在一项为期五年的前瞻性自然病史研究的这项为期三年、以PRO为重点的子研究中,还分析了这两种问卷之间的关联及其与视觉功能和疾病进展的加权测量值之间的相关性:42名患者参与了这项研究,其中大多数人至少完成了两次PRO随访,时间间隔至少一年。远距离活动(39.2-49.0 分)和周边视力(37.5-52.4 分)的 VFQ-25 平均得分最低,LLQ 分量表的平均得分也普遍较低(结论:该研究表明,远距离活动和周边视力与 VFQ-25 的关系密切:这项研究表明,VFQ-25 和 LLQ 分数之间存在密切联系,它们与视觉功能的临床测量结果也有关联:PRO工具可以深入了解这一特殊患者群体的具体残疾情况,并有助于指导未来临床试验的适当结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-Reported Outcomes in RLBP1 Retinal Dystrophy: Longitudinal Assessment in a Prospective Natural History Study.

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of two non-disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments, the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25) and the Low Luminance Questionnaire (LLQ), in patients with retinaldehyde-binding protein 1 retinal dystrophy (RLBP1 RD).

Methods: PROs were assessed using the VFQ-25 and LLQ. Rasch analysis was conducted to estimate person and item measures of the VFQ-25 and LLQ questionnaires to determine the association between the two PROs. In addition, the association between these two instruments and their correlations to weighted measures of visual function and disease progression were analyzed in this three-year PRO-focused sub-study of a five-year prospective natural history study.

Results: Forty-two patients participated, with most of them having completed at least two PRO follow-up visits at least one year apart. The mean VFQ-25 scores were lowest for distance activities (39.2-49.0) and peripheral vision (37.5-52.4), with mean LLQ subscale scores generally low (<41), except for the emotional distress subscale. Using Rasch analysis, calibrated item and person measures along with their standard errors were estimated for both ePROs. This indicated that the distribution of the VFQ-25 and LLQ item measures well covered the distribution of person function in this group. This suggests that the item difficulties well cover the person-level performance in this population. As well, the two PROs showed a strong and significant correlation at all assessed time points as assessed with Pearson correlation coefficient (0.81, 0.91, 0.81 and 0.87 at baseline, 1/1.5, 2/2.5 (P < 0.001) and 3/3.5 years (P = 0.002)). The composite scores of both PRO questionnaires strongly correlated with clinical measures of visual function. At 2 to 2.5 years of follow-up, meaningful statistically significant declines in peripheral vision (both VFQ-25 and LLQ), distance vision (VFQ-25), and extreme lighting in dark and bright light (LLQ) subscales were noted.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated a strong association between VFQ-25 and LLQ scores and their association with clinical measures of visual function.

Translational relevance: PRO instruments can provide insights into the specific disabilities of this unique patient population and help to guide appropriate outcome measures for future clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Translational Vision Science & Technology Engineering-Biomedical Engineering
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
346
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Vision Science & Technology (TVST), an official journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO), an international organization whose purpose is to advance research worldwide into understanding the visual system and preventing, treating and curing its disorders, is an online, open access, peer-reviewed journal emphasizing multidisciplinary research that bridges the gap between basic research and clinical care. A highly qualified and diverse group of Associate Editors and Editorial Board Members is led by Editor-in-Chief Marco Zarbin, MD, PhD, FARVO. The journal covers a broad spectrum of work, including but not limited to: Applications of stem cell technology for regenerative medicine, Development of new animal models of human diseases, Tissue bioengineering, Chemical engineering to improve virus-based gene delivery, Nanotechnology for drug delivery, Design and synthesis of artificial extracellular matrices, Development of a true microsurgical operating environment, Refining data analysis algorithms to improve in vivo imaging technology, Results of Phase 1 clinical trials, Reverse translational ("bedside to bench") research. TVST seeks manuscripts from scientists and clinicians with diverse backgrounds ranging from basic chemistry to ophthalmic surgery that will advance or change the way we understand and/or treat vision-threatening diseases. TVST encourages the use of color, multimedia, hyperlinks, program code and other digital enhancements.
期刊最新文献
Associations Between Diabetic Retinopathy and Frailty: Insights From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Mendelian Randomization. Effect of the Sugar Present in the Culture Medium on the Preservation of Human RPE Cell Suspensions. Advanced Artificial-Intelligence-Based Jiang Formula for Intraocular Lens Power in Congenital Ectopia Lentis. Detecting and Quantifying Glaucomatous Visual Function Loss With Continuous Visual Stimulus Tracking: A Case-Control Study. RetOCTNet: Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of OCT Images Following Retinal Ganglion Cell Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1