The Neurobehavioral State hypothesis

Since the early attempts to understand the brain made by Greek philosophers more than 2000 years ago, one of the main questions in neuroscience has been how the brain perceives all the stimuli in the environment and uses this information to implement a response. Recent hypotheses of the neural code rely on the existence of an ideal observer, whether on specific areas of the cerebral cortex or distributed network composed of cortical and subcortical elements. The Neurobehavioral State hypothesis stipulates that neurons are in a quasi-stable state due to the dynamic interaction of their molecular components. This increases their computational capabilities and electrophysiological behavior further than a binary active/inactive state. Together, neuronal populations across the brain learn to identify and associate internal and external stimuli with actions and emotions. Furthermore, such associations can be stored through the regulation of neuronal components as new quasi-stable states. Using this framework, behavior arises as the result of the dynamic interaction between internal and external stimuli together with previously established quasi-stable states that delineate the behavioral response. Finally, the Neurobehavioral State hypothesis is firmly grounded on present evidence of the complex dynamics within the brain, from the molecular to the network level, and avoids the need for a central observer by proposing the brain configures itself through experience-driven associations.