Runze Zhang , Jiaxing Xu , Panxin Zhang , Yan Han , Changlu Hu , Victor Sadras , Xueyun Yang , Shulan Zhang
{"title":"综合测量根系、δ18O 和 δ2H,并利用贝叶斯混合模型捕捉深厚壤土中小麦吸水的土壤剖面图","authors":"Runze Zhang , Jiaxing Xu , Panxin Zhang , Yan Han , Changlu Hu , Victor Sadras , Xueyun Yang , Shulan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2024.106359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The profile of crop water uptake from the soil depends on rainfall regime (amount, seasonality, frequency distribution of rainfall event size), soil, crop, and management. This study, with a focus on winter wheat in a wheat-fallow system, combines measurements of hydrogen (δD) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotopes with a Bayesian mixing model (MixSIAR), and measurements of root length density to (i) quantify crop water uptake from soil down to 3 m depth, (ii) to assess the influence of soil water at sowing, soil mulching, seasonal conditions and their interaction on the profiles of soil water uptake, and (iii) to probe for relations between yield and the profiles of soil water uptake. Across treatments and seasons, water uptake at jointing featured a ratio 2.1: 1.0: 1.8: 2.2 in four soil layers, top 0.2 m, 0.2<img>0.4 m, 0.4<img>1.2 m, and 1.2–3.0 m. At anthesis, the ratios shifted to 5.2: 1.0: 1.7: 2.0. Water uptake at jointing was higher from top-soil in dry (∼60 %) than in wet condition (∼30 %), and the opposite was true in deeper layers; water supply had a smaller effect on the profiles of water uptake at anthesis. Compared to bare ground, mulch favored root proliferation and water uptake in 0.4<img>2.0 m soil layer. For a given soil layer, soil moisture correlated negatively with root length density. Yield correlated positively and linearly with water uptake from 0.4<img>3.0 m soil at jointing, indicating that faster root development at early stages favors water uptake from deep soil in the critical period of grain yield formation. We discuss the implications of our findings for agronomic management and breeding.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"246 ","pages":"Article 106359"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined measurement of roots, δ18O and δ2H, and a Bayesian mixed model capture the soil profiles of wheat water uptake in a deep loamy soil\",\"authors\":\"Runze Zhang , Jiaxing Xu , Panxin Zhang , Yan Han , Changlu Hu , Victor Sadras , Xueyun Yang , Shulan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2024.106359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The profile of crop water uptake from the soil depends on rainfall regime (amount, seasonality, frequency distribution of rainfall event size), soil, crop, and management. This study, with a focus on winter wheat in a wheat-fallow system, combines measurements of hydrogen (δD) and oxygen (δ<sup>18</sup>O) isotopes with a Bayesian mixing model (MixSIAR), and measurements of root length density to (i) quantify crop water uptake from soil down to 3 m depth, (ii) to assess the influence of soil water at sowing, soil mulching, seasonal conditions and their interaction on the profiles of soil water uptake, and (iii) to probe for relations between yield and the profiles of soil water uptake. Across treatments and seasons, water uptake at jointing featured a ratio 2.1: 1.0: 1.8: 2.2 in four soil layers, top 0.2 m, 0.2<img>0.4 m, 0.4<img>1.2 m, and 1.2–3.0 m. At anthesis, the ratios shifted to 5.2: 1.0: 1.7: 2.0. Water uptake at jointing was higher from top-soil in dry (∼60 %) than in wet condition (∼30 %), and the opposite was true in deeper layers; water supply had a smaller effect on the profiles of water uptake at anthesis. Compared to bare ground, mulch favored root proliferation and water uptake in 0.4<img>2.0 m soil layer. For a given soil layer, soil moisture correlated negatively with root length density. Yield correlated positively and linearly with water uptake from 0.4<img>3.0 m soil at jointing, indicating that faster root development at early stages favors water uptake from deep soil in the critical period of grain yield formation. We discuss the implications of our findings for agronomic management and breeding.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"246 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872400360X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016719872400360X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Combined measurement of roots, δ18O and δ2H, and a Bayesian mixed model capture the soil profiles of wheat water uptake in a deep loamy soil
The profile of crop water uptake from the soil depends on rainfall regime (amount, seasonality, frequency distribution of rainfall event size), soil, crop, and management. This study, with a focus on winter wheat in a wheat-fallow system, combines measurements of hydrogen (δD) and oxygen (δ18O) isotopes with a Bayesian mixing model (MixSIAR), and measurements of root length density to (i) quantify crop water uptake from soil down to 3 m depth, (ii) to assess the influence of soil water at sowing, soil mulching, seasonal conditions and their interaction on the profiles of soil water uptake, and (iii) to probe for relations between yield and the profiles of soil water uptake. Across treatments and seasons, water uptake at jointing featured a ratio 2.1: 1.0: 1.8: 2.2 in four soil layers, top 0.2 m, 0.20.4 m, 0.41.2 m, and 1.2–3.0 m. At anthesis, the ratios shifted to 5.2: 1.0: 1.7: 2.0. Water uptake at jointing was higher from top-soil in dry (∼60 %) than in wet condition (∼30 %), and the opposite was true in deeper layers; water supply had a smaller effect on the profiles of water uptake at anthesis. Compared to bare ground, mulch favored root proliferation and water uptake in 0.42.0 m soil layer. For a given soil layer, soil moisture correlated negatively with root length density. Yield correlated positively and linearly with water uptake from 0.43.0 m soil at jointing, indicating that faster root development at early stages favors water uptake from deep soil in the critical period of grain yield formation. We discuss the implications of our findings for agronomic management and breeding.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.