Jongin Kim , Hojin Jo , Jaehyeong Lee , Sungyoon Song , Gilsoo Jang
{"title":"韩国核发电的运行灵活性:综合影响分析","authors":"Jongin Kim , Hojin Jo , Jaehyeong Lee , Sungyoon Song , Gilsoo Jang","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Korea is striving to expand renewable energy capacity across the country. However, in response to various challenges, the Korean government has revised the existing strategy to incorporate other carbon-free energy sources, including nuclear power, to advance the energy transition. Nuclear power plants currently operate as baseload units owing to reliability and economic consideration, but flexible operation is becoming necessary to support the growing integration of renewable energy. This study examines the transition of Korea's nuclear power plants from baseload to flexible operation. Based on Korea's electricity supply and demand framework plans, this study assesses the effects of flexible nuclear operations on annual renewable energy output curtailment and fuel costs for 2030 and 2036 through power market simulations. Additionally, grid stability implications are evaluated using a power system simulator. The findings show that flexible nuclear plant operations can help mitigate output limitations and improve grid stability by providing flexibility and reserves. However, the provision of reserves from nuclear power plants incurs increased fuel costs due to the additional consumption of fossil fuels. While the flexibility of nuclear power contributes positively to carbon neutrality by increasing renewable capacity and improving grid reliability, increasing the flexibility of nuclear power plants may inadvertently increase the reliance on fossil fuel. This tendency, in turn, could increase overall fuel costs and carbon emissions, posing a challenge to achieving carbon neutrality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":418,"journal":{"name":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 115055"},"PeriodicalIF":16.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operational flexibility nuclear generation in South Korea: A comprehensive impact analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jongin Kim , Hojin Jo , Jaehyeong Lee , Sungyoon Song , Gilsoo Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rser.2024.115055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Korea is striving to expand renewable energy capacity across the country. However, in response to various challenges, the Korean government has revised the existing strategy to incorporate other carbon-free energy sources, including nuclear power, to advance the energy transition. Nuclear power plants currently operate as baseload units owing to reliability and economic consideration, but flexible operation is becoming necessary to support the growing integration of renewable energy. This study examines the transition of Korea's nuclear power plants from baseload to flexible operation. Based on Korea's electricity supply and demand framework plans, this study assesses the effects of flexible nuclear operations on annual renewable energy output curtailment and fuel costs for 2030 and 2036 through power market simulations. Additionally, grid stability implications are evaluated using a power system simulator. The findings show that flexible nuclear plant operations can help mitigate output limitations and improve grid stability by providing flexibility and reserves. However, the provision of reserves from nuclear power plants incurs increased fuel costs due to the additional consumption of fossil fuels. While the flexibility of nuclear power contributes positively to carbon neutrality by increasing renewable capacity and improving grid reliability, increasing the flexibility of nuclear power plants may inadvertently increase the reliance on fossil fuel. This tendency, in turn, could increase overall fuel costs and carbon emissions, posing a challenge to achieving carbon neutrality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115055\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007810\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124007810","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Operational flexibility nuclear generation in South Korea: A comprehensive impact analysis
Korea is striving to expand renewable energy capacity across the country. However, in response to various challenges, the Korean government has revised the existing strategy to incorporate other carbon-free energy sources, including nuclear power, to advance the energy transition. Nuclear power plants currently operate as baseload units owing to reliability and economic consideration, but flexible operation is becoming necessary to support the growing integration of renewable energy. This study examines the transition of Korea's nuclear power plants from baseload to flexible operation. Based on Korea's electricity supply and demand framework plans, this study assesses the effects of flexible nuclear operations on annual renewable energy output curtailment and fuel costs for 2030 and 2036 through power market simulations. Additionally, grid stability implications are evaluated using a power system simulator. The findings show that flexible nuclear plant operations can help mitigate output limitations and improve grid stability by providing flexibility and reserves. However, the provision of reserves from nuclear power plants incurs increased fuel costs due to the additional consumption of fossil fuels. While the flexibility of nuclear power contributes positively to carbon neutrality by increasing renewable capacity and improving grid reliability, increasing the flexibility of nuclear power plants may inadvertently increase the reliance on fossil fuel. This tendency, in turn, could increase overall fuel costs and carbon emissions, posing a challenge to achieving carbon neutrality.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews is to disseminate the most compelling and pertinent critical insights in renewable and sustainable energy, fostering collaboration among the research community, private sector, and policy and decision makers. The journal aims to exchange challenges, solutions, innovative concepts, and technologies, contributing to sustainable development, the transition to a low-carbon future, and the attainment of emissions targets outlined by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews publishes a diverse range of content, including review papers, original research, case studies, and analyses of new technologies, all featuring a substantial review component such as critique, comparison, or analysis. Introducing a distinctive paper type, Expert Insights, the journal presents commissioned mini-reviews authored by field leaders, addressing topics of significant interest. Case studies undergo consideration only if they showcase the work's applicability to other regions or contribute valuable insights to the broader field of renewable and sustainable energy. Notably, a bibliographic or literature review lacking critical analysis is deemed unsuitable for publication.