价格在展示复杂性对园艺植物购买意向的影响中的作用:眼动追踪研究

IF 11 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104124
Jie Li , Bridget Behe , Patricia Huddleston , Scott Thatcher
{"title":"价格在展示复杂性对园艺植物购买意向的影响中的作用:眼动追踪研究","authors":"Jie Li ,&nbsp;Bridget Behe ,&nbsp;Patricia Huddleston ,&nbsp;Scott Thatcher","doi":"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given that most live plants are still sold in physical stores, the influence of in-store display complexity on visual attention and purchase intention interests both practitioners and scholars. However, the interactive role of price and display complexity on choice has yet to be studied. Using Split-attention Effect in Cognitive Load Theory and Price-Quality Heuristic as theoretical frameworks, we conducted a within-subjects experiment using eye-tracking technology. We explored how price signs and display complexity affect visual attention and purchase intention. Prices were varied for two levels (regular vs. discounted) and display complexity was varied for 6, 12, and 24-item displays. Participants chose their most preferred option and indicated their purchase intention. Our study suggests that price moderates the Display Complexity (DC)-Likelihood-to-Buy (LTB) and Visual Attention on Sign (VAS) - LTB relationship. LTB increases with DC at a regular price, while LTB does not vary by DC at a discounted price. At a regular price, VAS is negatively related to LTB, while at a discounted price, VAS is positively associated with LTB. Implications for retailers include increasing the number of plants on display when no discount is offered and making regular price signs more appealing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48399,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","volume":"82 ","pages":"Article 104124"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of price in display complexity's impact on horticultural plant purchase intention: An eye-tracking study\",\"authors\":\"Jie Li ,&nbsp;Bridget Behe ,&nbsp;Patricia Huddleston ,&nbsp;Scott Thatcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given that most live plants are still sold in physical stores, the influence of in-store display complexity on visual attention and purchase intention interests both practitioners and scholars. However, the interactive role of price and display complexity on choice has yet to be studied. Using Split-attention Effect in Cognitive Load Theory and Price-Quality Heuristic as theoretical frameworks, we conducted a within-subjects experiment using eye-tracking technology. We explored how price signs and display complexity affect visual attention and purchase intention. Prices were varied for two levels (regular vs. discounted) and display complexity was varied for 6, 12, and 24-item displays. Participants chose their most preferred option and indicated their purchase intention. Our study suggests that price moderates the Display Complexity (DC)-Likelihood-to-Buy (LTB) and Visual Attention on Sign (VAS) - LTB relationship. LTB increases with DC at a regular price, while LTB does not vary by DC at a discounted price. At a regular price, VAS is negatively related to LTB, while at a discounted price, VAS is positively associated with LTB. Implications for retailers include increasing the number of plants on display when no discount is offered and making regular price signs more appealing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"volume\":\"82 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969892400420X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096969892400420X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于大多数活体植物仍在实体店销售,店内陈列的复杂性对视觉注意力和购买意向的影响引起了从业人员和学者的兴趣。然而,价格和陈列复杂性对选择的交互作用还有待研究。我们以认知负荷理论中的分离注意效应和价格-质量启发式为理论框架,利用眼动跟踪技术进行了一项被试内实验。我们探讨了价格标识和展示复杂性如何影响视觉注意力和购买意向。价格分为两个等级(正常价格与折扣价格),展示复杂度分为 6、12 和 24 个项目。参与者选择自己最喜欢的选项并表明购买意向。我们的研究表明,价格调节了展示复杂度(DC)-购买可能性(LTB)和标志上的视觉注意力(VAS)-LTB 的关系。在正常价格下,LTB 随显示复杂度的增加而增加,而在折扣价格下,LTB 不随显示复杂度的变化而变化。在正常价格下,VAS 与 LTB 呈负相关,而在折扣价格下,VAS 与 LTB 呈正相关。这对零售商的启示包括在不提供折扣时增加展示植物的数量,并使正价标志更具吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of price in display complexity's impact on horticultural plant purchase intention: An eye-tracking study
Given that most live plants are still sold in physical stores, the influence of in-store display complexity on visual attention and purchase intention interests both practitioners and scholars. However, the interactive role of price and display complexity on choice has yet to be studied. Using Split-attention Effect in Cognitive Load Theory and Price-Quality Heuristic as theoretical frameworks, we conducted a within-subjects experiment using eye-tracking technology. We explored how price signs and display complexity affect visual attention and purchase intention. Prices were varied for two levels (regular vs. discounted) and display complexity was varied for 6, 12, and 24-item displays. Participants chose their most preferred option and indicated their purchase intention. Our study suggests that price moderates the Display Complexity (DC)-Likelihood-to-Buy (LTB) and Visual Attention on Sign (VAS) - LTB relationship. LTB increases with DC at a regular price, while LTB does not vary by DC at a discounted price. At a regular price, VAS is negatively related to LTB, while at a discounted price, VAS is positively associated with LTB. Implications for retailers include increasing the number of plants on display when no discount is offered and making regular price signs more appealing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
14.40%
发文量
340
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services is a prominent publication that serves as a platform for international and interdisciplinary research and discussions in the constantly evolving fields of retailing and services studies. With a specific emphasis on consumer behavior and policy and managerial decisions, the journal aims to foster contributions from academics encompassing diverse disciplines. The primary areas covered by the journal are: Retailing and the sale of goods The provision of consumer services, including transportation, tourism, and leisure.
期刊最新文献
Customers’ reuse intention to autonomous delivery vehicles in terminal delivery service: A valence theory perspective We match! Building online brand engagement behaviours through emotional and rational processes From popularity to pitfalls: Diagnosing consumer issues and engineering solutions for an ink-inspired mobile theme system Retail consumers' conundrum: An in-depth qualitative study navigating the motivations and aversion of chatbots Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1