Ayah Shaheen, Amena Sadiya, Bashair M Mussa, Salah Abusnana
{"title":"健康阿联酋成年人餐后血糖和胰岛素对进餐顺序的反应:随机对照交叉试验。","authors":"Ayah Shaheen, Amena Sadiya, Bashair M Mussa, Salah Abusnana","doi":"10.2147/DMSO.S468628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary patterns that lower postprandial glycemia have been effective in preventing type 2 diabetes. Consuming macronutrients in a specific sequence within a meal has been considered as a novel strategy to reduce post-meal glucose spikes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of meal sequence on postprandial glucose and insulin response among healthy adults in the United Arab Emirates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy adults participated in a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Two isocaloric meals were consumed separately in a different order: a standard mixed meal (SMM) vs vegetables and protein first followed by carbohydrates (VPF) meal. The postprandial glucose and insulin levels were determined at Fasting, 30, 60, and 120 min. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating was used to assess hunger at similar frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean glucose and insulin levels significantly reduced (p = 0.001) following VPF meal compared to SMM at 30 min. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC0-120) for glucose following the VPF meal sequence was 40.9% lower (p = 0.03) compared with the SMM (572.83; 95% CI 157.3 to 988.2) vs (968.5; 95% CI 692.4 to 1244.8 mg/dL). Furthermore, the iAUC0-120 for insulin following the VPF meal sequence was 31.7% lower than the SMM meal sequence. (2184; 95% CI 1638.30 to 2729) vs (3196.94; 95% CI 2328.19 to 4065.69) mIU/mL × 120 min, P = 0.023). The feeling of fullness measured by the hunger scale showed that the feeling of fullness was higher after 60 and 120 minutes (p = 0.05, p = 0.04) with the VPF meal sequence compared to the SMM sequence. Although, there is no significant difference in the Area under the curve (AUC) for hunger rating between the two meals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VPF meal sequence could significantly reduce postprandial glucose and insulin levels and sustain fullness after a meal. Meal sequencing could be an effective dietary strategy for improving the postprandial glucose and insulin response in healthy adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11116,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","volume":"17 ","pages":"4257-4265"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572438/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Response to Meal Sequence Among Healthy UAE Adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Ayah Shaheen, Amena Sadiya, Bashair M Mussa, Salah Abusnana\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/DMSO.S468628\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary patterns that lower postprandial glycemia have been effective in preventing type 2 diabetes. Consuming macronutrients in a specific sequence within a meal has been considered as a novel strategy to reduce post-meal glucose spikes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of meal sequence on postprandial glucose and insulin response among healthy adults in the United Arab Emirates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy adults participated in a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Two isocaloric meals were consumed separately in a different order: a standard mixed meal (SMM) vs vegetables and protein first followed by carbohydrates (VPF) meal. The postprandial glucose and insulin levels were determined at Fasting, 30, 60, and 120 min. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating was used to assess hunger at similar frequencies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean glucose and insulin levels significantly reduced (p = 0.001) following VPF meal compared to SMM at 30 min. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC0-120) for glucose following the VPF meal sequence was 40.9% lower (p = 0.03) compared with the SMM (572.83; 95% CI 157.3 to 988.2) vs (968.5; 95% CI 692.4 to 1244.8 mg/dL). Furthermore, the iAUC0-120 for insulin following the VPF meal sequence was 31.7% lower than the SMM meal sequence. (2184; 95% CI 1638.30 to 2729) vs (3196.94; 95% CI 2328.19 to 4065.69) mIU/mL × 120 min, P = 0.023). The feeling of fullness measured by the hunger scale showed that the feeling of fullness was higher after 60 and 120 minutes (p = 0.05, p = 0.04) with the VPF meal sequence compared to the SMM sequence. Although, there is no significant difference in the Area under the curve (AUC) for hunger rating between the two meals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VPF meal sequence could significantly reduce postprandial glucose and insulin levels and sustain fullness after a meal. Meal sequencing could be an effective dietary strategy for improving the postprandial glucose and insulin response in healthy adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"4257-4265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572438/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S468628\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S468628","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:降低餐后血糖的膳食模式可有效预防 2 型糖尿病。在一餐中按特定顺序摄入宏量营养素被认为是降低餐后血糖峰值的一种新策略。因此,本研究旨在调查进餐顺序对阿拉伯联合酋长国健康成年人餐后血糖和胰岛素反应的影响:方法:18 名健康成年人参加了一项交叉随机对照试验。方法:18 名健康成年人参加了交叉随机对照试验,分别以不同的顺序进食两顿等热量餐:标准混合餐(SMM)与先蔬菜和蛋白质后碳水化合物餐(VPF)。分别在空腹、30 分钟、60 分钟和 120 分钟测定餐后血糖和胰岛素水平。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)以类似频率评估饥饿感:结果:与 SMM 相比,VPF 餐后 30 分钟的平均血糖和胰岛素水平明显降低(p = 0.001)。与 SMM(572.83;95% CI 157.3 至 988.2)相比(968.5;95% CI 692.4 至 1244.8 mg/dL),VPF 餐后的葡萄糖增量曲线下面积(iAUC0-120)降低了 40.9% (p = 0.03)。此外,VPF 餐序列后的胰岛素 iAUC0-120 比 SMM 餐序列低 31.7%。(2184; 95% CI 1638.30 to 2729) vs (3196.94; 95% CI 2328.19 to 4065.69) mIU/mL × 120 min, P = 0.023)。用饥饿量表测量的饱腹感显示,VPF 餐序列与 SMM 餐序列相比,60 分钟和 120 分钟后的饱腹感更高(P = 0.05,P = 0.04)。结论:VPF 餐序能显著降低饥饿感:结论:VPF 餐序能显著降低餐后血糖和胰岛素水平,并维持餐后饱腹感。排序进餐可能是改善健康成年人餐后血糖和胰岛素反应的有效饮食策略。
Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Response to Meal Sequence Among Healthy UAE Adults: A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial.
Background: Dietary patterns that lower postprandial glycemia have been effective in preventing type 2 diabetes. Consuming macronutrients in a specific sequence within a meal has been considered as a novel strategy to reduce post-meal glucose spikes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of meal sequence on postprandial glucose and insulin response among healthy adults in the United Arab Emirates.
Methods: Eighteen healthy adults participated in a cross-over randomized controlled trial. Two isocaloric meals were consumed separately in a different order: a standard mixed meal (SMM) vs vegetables and protein first followed by carbohydrates (VPF) meal. The postprandial glucose and insulin levels were determined at Fasting, 30, 60, and 120 min. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating was used to assess hunger at similar frequencies.
Results: The mean glucose and insulin levels significantly reduced (p = 0.001) following VPF meal compared to SMM at 30 min. The incremental area under the curve (iAUC0-120) for glucose following the VPF meal sequence was 40.9% lower (p = 0.03) compared with the SMM (572.83; 95% CI 157.3 to 988.2) vs (968.5; 95% CI 692.4 to 1244.8 mg/dL). Furthermore, the iAUC0-120 for insulin following the VPF meal sequence was 31.7% lower than the SMM meal sequence. (2184; 95% CI 1638.30 to 2729) vs (3196.94; 95% CI 2328.19 to 4065.69) mIU/mL × 120 min, P = 0.023). The feeling of fullness measured by the hunger scale showed that the feeling of fullness was higher after 60 and 120 minutes (p = 0.05, p = 0.04) with the VPF meal sequence compared to the SMM sequence. Although, there is no significant difference in the Area under the curve (AUC) for hunger rating between the two meals.
Conclusion: The VPF meal sequence could significantly reduce postprandial glucose and insulin levels and sustain fullness after a meal. Meal sequencing could be an effective dietary strategy for improving the postprandial glucose and insulin response in healthy adults.
期刊介绍:
An international, peer-reviewed, open access, online journal. The journal is committed to the rapid publication of the latest laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity research. Original research, review, case reports, hypothesis formation, expert opinion and commentaries are all considered for publication.