看一遍,自学一遍,做一遍:全球外科教育自学培训和评估的障碍与机遇

IF 1.4 Q3 SURGERY Surgery open science Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1016/j.sopen.2024.11.001
Olubunmi A. Fariyike , Jacqueline Yao , Mehdi Baqri , Peggy Liao , Catherine Mohr , George Korir , Taseer Feroze Din , Adam L. Kushner , Sherry M. Wren
{"title":"看一遍,自学一遍,做一遍:全球外科教育自学培训和评估的障碍与机遇","authors":"Olubunmi A. Fariyike ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Yao ,&nbsp;Mehdi Baqri ,&nbsp;Peggy Liao ,&nbsp;Catherine Mohr ,&nbsp;George Korir ,&nbsp;Taseer Feroze Din ,&nbsp;Adam L. Kushner ,&nbsp;Sherry M. Wren","doi":"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to determine the most important perceived barriers to the implementation of self-administered training and assessment in surgical education according to subject matter experts. With these findings, design thinking was used to explore possible interventions and develop a theory of change for overcoming identified barriers. Specifically, implementation was focused on expanding the surgical skills of associate clinicians (ACs) in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative study with 10 field experts representing surgeons, educators, and engineers from the US, South America, and East and West Africa was conducted. Interviewees were selected through purposeful snowball sampling until thematic saturation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted over video conference or in-person. Open-ended responses were synthesized, coded, and used to identify key barriers for scaling simulation-based learning and self-administered training and assessment in low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four major barriers to widespread implementation of self-administered training and assessment: demonstration of the safety and quality of surgical care provided after self-administered training; validation of the principle of self-administered training and assessment; translation of simulation skills to surgical knowledge; and integration into existing task shifting and task sharing legal landscapes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Increasing surgical capacity in LMICs is an urgent need that could be expanded with carefully developed self-administered training and assessment for ACs. The implementation process will be variable depending on local culture and regulations but is dependent on an international community of local champions to first produce a common body of evidence supporting the technology's utility and then to generate local excitement for its integration into existing systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74892,"journal":{"name":"Surgery open science","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 74-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"See one, teach yourself one, do one: Barriers and opportunities in self-administered training and assessment for global surgical education\",\"authors\":\"Olubunmi A. Fariyike ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Yao ,&nbsp;Mehdi Baqri ,&nbsp;Peggy Liao ,&nbsp;Catherine Mohr ,&nbsp;George Korir ,&nbsp;Taseer Feroze Din ,&nbsp;Adam L. Kushner ,&nbsp;Sherry M. Wren\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sopen.2024.11.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>We aimed to determine the most important perceived barriers to the implementation of self-administered training and assessment in surgical education according to subject matter experts. With these findings, design thinking was used to explore possible interventions and develop a theory of change for overcoming identified barriers. Specifically, implementation was focused on expanding the surgical skills of associate clinicians (ACs) in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative study with 10 field experts representing surgeons, educators, and engineers from the US, South America, and East and West Africa was conducted. Interviewees were selected through purposeful snowball sampling until thematic saturation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted over video conference or in-person. Open-ended responses were synthesized, coded, and used to identify key barriers for scaling simulation-based learning and self-administered training and assessment in low-resource settings.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four major barriers to widespread implementation of self-administered training and assessment: demonstration of the safety and quality of surgical care provided after self-administered training; validation of the principle of self-administered training and assessment; translation of simulation skills to surgical knowledge; and integration into existing task shifting and task sharing legal landscapes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Increasing surgical capacity in LMICs is an urgent need that could be expanded with carefully developed self-administered training and assessment for ACs. The implementation process will be variable depending on local culture and regulations but is dependent on an international community of local champions to first produce a common body of evidence supporting the technology's utility and then to generate local excitement for its integration into existing systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery open science\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 74-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery open science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery open science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589845024001337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们旨在根据学科专家的意见,确定在外科教育中实施自我管理培训和评估的最主要障碍。根据这些发现,我们采用设计思维来探索可能的干预措施,并为克服所发现的障碍制定了一套变革理论。具体来说,实施的重点是扩大中低收入国家(LMIC)准临床医师(ACs)的外科技能。研究方法 对来自美国、南美、东非和西非的 10 名外科医生、教育工作者和工程师领域专家进行了定性研究。受访者是通过有目的的滚雪球式抽样选出的,直到主题饱和为止。半结构式访谈通过视频会议或面对面的方式进行。对开放式回答进行了综合、编码,并用于确定在低资源环境中推广基于模拟的学习和自我管理的培训与评估的主要障碍。结果我们确定了广泛实施自控培训和评估的四大障碍:证明自控培训后提供的外科护理的安全性和质量;验证自控培训和评估的原则;将模拟技能转化为外科知识;以及融入现有的任务转移和任务分担的法律环境中。 讨论提高低收入国家和地区的外科能力是一项迫切需求,可以通过为助理医师精心设计的自控培训和评估来扩大这一需求。实施过程将因当地文化和法规而异,但有赖于由当地拥护者组成的国际团体首先提供支持该技术实用性的共同证据,然后在当地激发将该技术融入现有系统的热情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
See one, teach yourself one, do one: Barriers and opportunities in self-administered training and assessment for global surgical education

Objective

We aimed to determine the most important perceived barriers to the implementation of self-administered training and assessment in surgical education according to subject matter experts. With these findings, design thinking was used to explore possible interventions and develop a theory of change for overcoming identified barriers. Specifically, implementation was focused on expanding the surgical skills of associate clinicians (ACs) in low-to-middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods

A qualitative study with 10 field experts representing surgeons, educators, and engineers from the US, South America, and East and West Africa was conducted. Interviewees were selected through purposeful snowball sampling until thematic saturation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted over video conference or in-person. Open-ended responses were synthesized, coded, and used to identify key barriers for scaling simulation-based learning and self-administered training and assessment in low-resource settings.

Results

We identified four major barriers to widespread implementation of self-administered training and assessment: demonstration of the safety and quality of surgical care provided after self-administered training; validation of the principle of self-administered training and assessment; translation of simulation skills to surgical knowledge; and integration into existing task shifting and task sharing legal landscapes.

Discussion

Increasing surgical capacity in LMICs is an urgent need that could be expanded with carefully developed self-administered training and assessment for ACs. The implementation process will be variable depending on local culture and regulations but is dependent on an international community of local champions to first produce a common body of evidence supporting the technology's utility and then to generate local excitement for its integration into existing systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
66 days
期刊最新文献
Use of a microvascular anastomotic coupler device for kidney transplantation in rats Innovative strategies in bile duct repair: Assessing efficacy and safety across varied graft techniques - A systematic review Propensity matched analysis of DPA or DPL used within the first hour for severely hypotensive blunt trauma patients A retrospective study assessing RefluxStop surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: Clinical outcomes in 79 patients from Germany Age-stratified trends and outcomes of inpatient cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in the United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1