人口稠密城市地区自主公共交通系统的有效性

Maksim Gusev, Shane Gilroy
{"title":"人口稠密城市地区自主公共交通系统的有效性","authors":"Maksim Gusev,&nbsp;Shane Gilroy","doi":"10.1016/j.team.2024.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents an in-depth analysis and comparison of technologies for autonomous transport systems, focusing on logistical considerations, economic factors, and overall outcomes. The study evaluates various scenarios, including manned and autonomous ground vehicles, as well as infrastructure solutions, to provide insights into their operational efficiency and economic viability.</div><div>In the logistical comparison, findings indicate that autonomous and manned ground vehicles operate within similar logistical frameworks but offer different operational flexibilities. Autonomous systems demonstrate potential advantages in adaptability to changing passenger needs and risk reduction through sensor-based navigation. Additionally, deploying autonomous infrastructure solutions shows promising results in reducing cycle time (-43 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles) and increasing technical speed (+57 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles), especially in strained infrastructure environments.</div><div>The economic comparison reveals challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of autonomous solutions due to a lack of pricing data. While the automation of public transport vehicles incurs higher capital (e.g. 33 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned) and operational expenditures (e.g. 60 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned), autonomous systems offer benefits such as continuous operation and reduced idle time. Investments in infrastructure solutions present opportunities to diversify traffic flow and enhance the overall transportation system.</div><div>In conclusion, the autonomous transport system market requires increased transparency in pricing structures and technical maturity. Successful deployment depends on thorough demand studies and compatibility analyses with existing infrastructure. Innovative approaches like autonomous monorails or suspended Light Rail Transit (LRT) offer scalability, efficiency, and reduced environmental impact. Integrating predictive maintenance systems and advanced fleet management enhances reliability and service quality. Fostering transparency, embracing innovation, and implementing robust management systems are crucial for the successful integration of autonomous transport systems into urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101258,"journal":{"name":"Transport Economics and Management","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effectiveness of autonomous public transport systems in densely populated urban areas\",\"authors\":\"Maksim Gusev,&nbsp;Shane Gilroy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.team.2024.11.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents an in-depth analysis and comparison of technologies for autonomous transport systems, focusing on logistical considerations, economic factors, and overall outcomes. The study evaluates various scenarios, including manned and autonomous ground vehicles, as well as infrastructure solutions, to provide insights into their operational efficiency and economic viability.</div><div>In the logistical comparison, findings indicate that autonomous and manned ground vehicles operate within similar logistical frameworks but offer different operational flexibilities. Autonomous systems demonstrate potential advantages in adaptability to changing passenger needs and risk reduction through sensor-based navigation. Additionally, deploying autonomous infrastructure solutions shows promising results in reducing cycle time (-43 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles) and increasing technical speed (+57 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles), especially in strained infrastructure environments.</div><div>The economic comparison reveals challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of autonomous solutions due to a lack of pricing data. While the automation of public transport vehicles incurs higher capital (e.g. 33 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned) and operational expenditures (e.g. 60 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned), autonomous systems offer benefits such as continuous operation and reduced idle time. Investments in infrastructure solutions present opportunities to diversify traffic flow and enhance the overall transportation system.</div><div>In conclusion, the autonomous transport system market requires increased transparency in pricing structures and technical maturity. Successful deployment depends on thorough demand studies and compatibility analyses with existing infrastructure. Innovative approaches like autonomous monorails or suspended Light Rail Transit (LRT) offer scalability, efficiency, and reduced environmental impact. Integrating predictive maintenance systems and advanced fleet management enhances reliability and service quality. Fostering transparency, embracing innovation, and implementing robust management systems are crucial for the successful integration of autonomous transport systems into urban environments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transport Economics and Management\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transport Economics and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899624000303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Economics and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949899624000303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对自主运输系统技术进行了深入分析和比较,重点关注后勤考虑因素、经济因素和总体结果。研究评估了各种方案,包括有人驾驶和自动驾驶地面车辆,以及基础设施解决方案,以深入了解其运营效率和经济可行性。在后勤比较方面,研究结果表明,自动驾驶和有人驾驶地面车辆在类似的后勤框架内运行,但具有不同的运营灵活性。自主系统在适应不断变化的乘客需求和通过传感器导航降低风险方面具有潜在优势。此外,部署自主基础设施解决方案在减少周期时间(与地面载人/自主车辆相比减少 43%)和提高技术速度(与地面载人/自主车辆相比提高 57%)方面显示出良好的效果,尤其是在基础设施紧张的环境中。由于缺乏定价数据,经济比较显示出在评估自主解决方案的成本效益方面存在挑战。虽然公共交通车辆的自动化会产生更高的资本支出(例如,自动驾驶公交车与有人驾驶公交车相比增加了 33%)和运营支出(例如,自动驾驶公交车与有人驾驶公交车相比增加了 60%),但自动驾驶系统具有连续运行和减少空闲时间等优点。总之,自主运输系统市场需要提高定价结构和技术成熟度的透明度。成功部署取决于全面的需求研究和与现有基础设施的兼容性分析。自主单轨或悬挂式轻轨(LRT)等创新方法具有可扩展性、高效性并可减少对环境的影响。整合预测性维护系统和先进的车队管理可提高可靠性和服务质量。提高透明度、拥抱创新和实施强大的管理系统对于将自主运输系统成功融入城市环境至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effectiveness of autonomous public transport systems in densely populated urban areas
This paper presents an in-depth analysis and comparison of technologies for autonomous transport systems, focusing on logistical considerations, economic factors, and overall outcomes. The study evaluates various scenarios, including manned and autonomous ground vehicles, as well as infrastructure solutions, to provide insights into their operational efficiency and economic viability.
In the logistical comparison, findings indicate that autonomous and manned ground vehicles operate within similar logistical frameworks but offer different operational flexibilities. Autonomous systems demonstrate potential advantages in adaptability to changing passenger needs and risk reduction through sensor-based navigation. Additionally, deploying autonomous infrastructure solutions shows promising results in reducing cycle time (-43 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles) and increasing technical speed (+57 % to ground manned/autonomous vehicles), especially in strained infrastructure environments.
The economic comparison reveals challenges in assessing the cost-effectiveness of autonomous solutions due to a lack of pricing data. While the automation of public transport vehicles incurs higher capital (e.g. 33 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned) and operational expenditures (e.g. 60 % increase for autonomous buses vs manned), autonomous systems offer benefits such as continuous operation and reduced idle time. Investments in infrastructure solutions present opportunities to diversify traffic flow and enhance the overall transportation system.
In conclusion, the autonomous transport system market requires increased transparency in pricing structures and technical maturity. Successful deployment depends on thorough demand studies and compatibility analyses with existing infrastructure. Innovative approaches like autonomous monorails or suspended Light Rail Transit (LRT) offer scalability, efficiency, and reduced environmental impact. Integrating predictive maintenance systems and advanced fleet management enhances reliability and service quality. Fostering transparency, embracing innovation, and implementing robust management systems are crucial for the successful integration of autonomous transport systems into urban environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
AI-driven scenarios for urban mobility: Quantifying the role of ODE models and scenario planning in reducing traffic congestion Predicting biking preferences in Kigali city: A comparative study of traditional statistical models and ensemble machine learning models Analyzing the acceptance of new public transportation pricing schemes: A case study of a developing country Who are MaaS avoiders, wanderers or enthusiasts and what drives their intentions to adopt MaaS? Dissecting climate adaptation strategies and planning of ports from different theoretical angles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1