Madeline M. Harper , Paige M. Cunningham , John E. Hayes
{"title":"即使在能量密度降低的情况下,蘸酱也能提高进食率,促进摄入量的增加","authors":"Madeline M. Harper , Paige M. Cunningham , John E. Hayes","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Increasing food lubricity by adding dip increases eating rate; however it remains unclear if such manipulation influences energy intake of a snack, or how this might combine with energy density (ED) to affect risk of energy overconsumption. Here, we used pretzels and hummus to investigate the effects of oral lubrication (with vs. without hummus) and ED on snack intake. Adults (<em>n</em> = 46, 67 % female) were video recorded while consuming a 70 ± 2 g pretzel snack (∼2.5 servings) ad libitum 3 times in our laboratory: once each with reduced-ED hummus, matched-ED hummus, and no hummus (control). Both hummuses were ∼ 110 g (∼4 oz). Intake was measured, and video recordings were used to assess eating rate. Consistent with the expected effects of increasing lubricity, pretzel and total snack eating rates were faster in the hummus conditions vs. the control (all p's < 0.001), indicating that hummus increased lubricity and facilitated faster consumption. More was consumed of the pretzels and total snack in the hummus conditions compared to the control (all p's < 0.001), suggesting that increased lubricity promoted intake. Although ED did not completely mitigate the effects of lubricity on pretzel and total snack energy intake, it did moderate these effects (matched > reduced > control; all p's < 0.001). Overall, including hummus increased eating rate, presumably by increasing snack lubricity, and the commensurate increase in intake persisted even when the dip had a lower ED. Thus, consumption of snacks lower in ED and without lubricating dips may be an effective way to help reduce energy intake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 105376"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dip increases eating rate and promotes greater intake even when energy density is reduced\",\"authors\":\"Madeline M. Harper , Paige M. Cunningham , John E. Hayes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Increasing food lubricity by adding dip increases eating rate; however it remains unclear if such manipulation influences energy intake of a snack, or how this might combine with energy density (ED) to affect risk of energy overconsumption. Here, we used pretzels and hummus to investigate the effects of oral lubrication (with vs. without hummus) and ED on snack intake. Adults (<em>n</em> = 46, 67 % female) were video recorded while consuming a 70 ± 2 g pretzel snack (∼2.5 servings) ad libitum 3 times in our laboratory: once each with reduced-ED hummus, matched-ED hummus, and no hummus (control). Both hummuses were ∼ 110 g (∼4 oz). Intake was measured, and video recordings were used to assess eating rate. Consistent with the expected effects of increasing lubricity, pretzel and total snack eating rates were faster in the hummus conditions vs. the control (all p's < 0.001), indicating that hummus increased lubricity and facilitated faster consumption. More was consumed of the pretzels and total snack in the hummus conditions compared to the control (all p's < 0.001), suggesting that increased lubricity promoted intake. Although ED did not completely mitigate the effects of lubricity on pretzel and total snack energy intake, it did moderate these effects (matched > reduced > control; all p's < 0.001). Overall, including hummus increased eating rate, presumably by increasing snack lubricity, and the commensurate increase in intake persisted even when the dip had a lower ED. Thus, consumption of snacks lower in ED and without lubricating dips may be an effective way to help reduce energy intake.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"125 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002787\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002787","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
通过添加蘸酱来增加食物的润滑度可以提高进食率;但是,这种操作是否会影响零食的能量摄入,或者如何与能量密度(ED)结合起来影响能量摄入过量的风险,目前仍不清楚。在此,我们使用椒盐脆饼和鹰嘴豆泥来研究口腔润滑(加鹰嘴豆泥与不加鹰嘴豆泥)和能量密度对零食摄入量的影响。成人(n = 46,67 % 为女性)在我们的实验室中随意食用 70 ± 2 克的椒盐脆饼零食(2.5 份)时,我们对其进行了 3 次录像记录:每次都有减少 ED 的鹰嘴豆泥、匹配 ED 的鹰嘴豆泥和无鹰嘴豆泥(对照组)。两种鹰嘴豆泥的重量均为∼ 110 克(∼ 4 盎司)。对摄入量进行测量,并通过录像评估进食率。与增加润滑度的预期效果一致,与对照组相比,鹰嘴豆泥条件下的椒盐脆饼和所有零食的进食速度更快(所有P均为0.001),这表明鹰嘴豆泥增加了润滑度,有利于加快进食速度。与对照组相比,鹰嘴豆泥条件下的椒盐脆饼和零食总摄入量更高(所有 p 均为 0.001),这表明润滑度的增加促进了摄入量。虽然 ED 没有完全缓解润滑度对椒盐卷饼和零食总能量摄入的影响,但它确实缓和了这些影响(匹配> 减少> 对照组;所有 p's < 0.001)。总之,加入鹰嘴豆泥会增加进食率,这可能是通过增加零食的润滑度实现的,即使蘸酱的 ED 值较低,摄入量也会相应增加。因此,食用ED值较低且不含润滑蘸料的零食可能是帮助减少能量摄入的有效方法。
Dip increases eating rate and promotes greater intake even when energy density is reduced
Increasing food lubricity by adding dip increases eating rate; however it remains unclear if such manipulation influences energy intake of a snack, or how this might combine with energy density (ED) to affect risk of energy overconsumption. Here, we used pretzels and hummus to investigate the effects of oral lubrication (with vs. without hummus) and ED on snack intake. Adults (n = 46, 67 % female) were video recorded while consuming a 70 ± 2 g pretzel snack (∼2.5 servings) ad libitum 3 times in our laboratory: once each with reduced-ED hummus, matched-ED hummus, and no hummus (control). Both hummuses were ∼ 110 g (∼4 oz). Intake was measured, and video recordings were used to assess eating rate. Consistent with the expected effects of increasing lubricity, pretzel and total snack eating rates were faster in the hummus conditions vs. the control (all p's < 0.001), indicating that hummus increased lubricity and facilitated faster consumption. More was consumed of the pretzels and total snack in the hummus conditions compared to the control (all p's < 0.001), suggesting that increased lubricity promoted intake. Although ED did not completely mitigate the effects of lubricity on pretzel and total snack energy intake, it did moderate these effects (matched > reduced > control; all p's < 0.001). Overall, including hummus increased eating rate, presumably by increasing snack lubricity, and the commensurate increase in intake persisted even when the dip had a lower ED. Thus, consumption of snacks lower in ED and without lubricating dips may be an effective way to help reduce energy intake.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.