镰状细胞病成人患者使用急诊室的模式

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Revue De Medecine Interne Pub Date : 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1016/j.revmed.2024.10.371
J.S. Rech , A. Santin , F. Lionnet , S. Mattioni , E. Dubreucq Guerif , O. Steichen , P.Y. Boelle
{"title":"镰状细胞病成人患者使用急诊室的模式","authors":"J.S. Rech ,&nbsp;A. Santin ,&nbsp;F. Lionnet ,&nbsp;S. Mattioni ,&nbsp;E. Dubreucq Guerif ,&nbsp;O. Steichen ,&nbsp;P.Y. Boelle","doi":"10.1016/j.revmed.2024.10.371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acute painful episodes and acute chest syndromes are common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), often leading to emergency department (ED) visits. ED utilization differs among patients with SCD and varies over time for most individual. Factors such as genotype, age, sex, medication adherence, previous SCD complications, psychiatric comorbidities, and meteorological conditions have been suggested as contributors to this variability. This study aims to identify the main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, and describe associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from all adults with SCD followed up at a French reference center and hospitalized at least once between October 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. We used a Cox model for recurrent events with fixed and time dependent variables to estimate (i) the cumulative risk of ED visits and (ii) its variability over time. We then applied clustering methods on these two dimensions to identify typical patterns of ED utilization and compared the characteristics of individuals across these patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 656 adults with SCD, accounting for 9,080 ED visits over a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3–6), corresponding to 1 ED visit per patient per year (IQR 1–3). Of these visits, 5,157 (57%) resulted in home discharge, 3,573 (39%) led to hospital admission, and 350 (4%) required transfer to the intensive care unit.</div><div>Two clusters of patients emerged, based on their ED utilization: 529 (81%) with low ED use, accounting for 2,924 ED visits (32%); 127 (19%) with high ED use, accounting for 6,156 ED visits (68%). Patients in the high-use group had a higher prevalence of usual risk factors for ED visit, such as younger age, SS/Sβ0 genotype or past acute chest syndrome. They also had a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (56% vs. 14%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), notably anxious disorders (40% vs. 6%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</div><div>All individuals in the high-use group experienced bursts of ED visits, defined as at least 3 visits within 3 months and at least 3 times more than during the previous 3 months. This burst pattern was uncommon in the low-use group (7% of patients). Among patient prone to bursts, ED visits spaced less than a month apart were followed by a significantly increased risk of a new ED visit within the next month (adjusted hazard ratio 3.49 [95%CI 2.95–4.06]).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings highlight two main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, with a small subset of patients (19%) accounting for more than two thirds of ED visits (68%). These high-use patients have a markedly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and frequently experience bursts of ED visits, which strongly predict subsequent visits in the short term. These findings underscore the importance of integrating psychiatric support into SCD care and closely monitoring patients during burst period, to prevent recurrent ED visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Better understanding the factors that trigger bursts of ED visits in adults with SCD may lead to targeted interventions, such as mental health support, aimed at reducing ED utilization and improving patient outcomes and experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54458,"journal":{"name":"Revue De Medecine Interne","volume":"45 ","pages":"Pages A389-A390"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patterns of emergency department utilization in adults with sickle cell disease\",\"authors\":\"J.S. Rech ,&nbsp;A. Santin ,&nbsp;F. Lionnet ,&nbsp;S. Mattioni ,&nbsp;E. Dubreucq Guerif ,&nbsp;O. Steichen ,&nbsp;P.Y. Boelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.revmed.2024.10.371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acute painful episodes and acute chest syndromes are common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), often leading to emergency department (ED) visits. ED utilization differs among patients with SCD and varies over time for most individual. Factors such as genotype, age, sex, medication adherence, previous SCD complications, psychiatric comorbidities, and meteorological conditions have been suggested as contributors to this variability. This study aims to identify the main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, and describe associated factors.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>We analyzed data from all adults with SCD followed up at a French reference center and hospitalized at least once between October 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. We used a Cox model for recurrent events with fixed and time dependent variables to estimate (i) the cumulative risk of ED visits and (ii) its variability over time. We then applied clustering methods on these two dimensions to identify typical patterns of ED utilization and compared the characteristics of individuals across these patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 656 adults with SCD, accounting for 9,080 ED visits over a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3–6), corresponding to 1 ED visit per patient per year (IQR 1–3). Of these visits, 5,157 (57%) resulted in home discharge, 3,573 (39%) led to hospital admission, and 350 (4%) required transfer to the intensive care unit.</div><div>Two clusters of patients emerged, based on their ED utilization: 529 (81%) with low ED use, accounting for 2,924 ED visits (32%); 127 (19%) with high ED use, accounting for 6,156 ED visits (68%). Patients in the high-use group had a higher prevalence of usual risk factors for ED visit, such as younger age, SS/Sβ0 genotype or past acute chest syndrome. They also had a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (56% vs. 14%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001), notably anxious disorders (40% vs. 6%, <em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001).</div><div>All individuals in the high-use group experienced bursts of ED visits, defined as at least 3 visits within 3 months and at least 3 times more than during the previous 3 months. This burst pattern was uncommon in the low-use group (7% of patients). Among patient prone to bursts, ED visits spaced less than a month apart were followed by a significantly increased risk of a new ED visit within the next month (adjusted hazard ratio 3.49 [95%CI 2.95–4.06]).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Our findings highlight two main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, with a small subset of patients (19%) accounting for more than two thirds of ED visits (68%). These high-use patients have a markedly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and frequently experience bursts of ED visits, which strongly predict subsequent visits in the short term. These findings underscore the importance of integrating psychiatric support into SCD care and closely monitoring patients during burst period, to prevent recurrent ED visits.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Better understanding the factors that trigger bursts of ED visits in adults with SCD may lead to targeted interventions, such as mental health support, aimed at reducing ED utilization and improving patient outcomes and experience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue De Medecine Interne\",\"volume\":\"45 \",\"pages\":\"Pages A389-A390\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue De Medecine Interne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0248866324011706\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue De Medecine Interne","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0248866324011706","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言急性疼痛发作和急性胸部综合征是镰状细胞病(SCD)的常见并发症,通常会导致患者到急诊科(ED)就诊。SCD 患者使用急诊室的情况各不相同,大多数患者使用急诊室的情况也随时间而变化。基因型、年龄、性别、服药依从性、既往的 SCD 并发症、精神并发症和气象条件等因素被认为是造成这种差异的原因。本研究旨在确定成人 SCD 患者使用急诊室的主要模式,并描述相关因素。患者和方法我们分析了法国一家参考中心随访的所有成人 SCD 患者的数据,这些患者在 2013 年 10 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间至少住院过一次。我们使用带有固定变量和时间因变量的复发性事件 Cox 模型来估算 (i) ED 就诊的累积风险和 (ii) 随时间变化的风险。结果我们纳入了 656 名成人 SCD 患者,在中位随访 5 年(四分位数间距 [IQR] 3-6)期间,他们共就诊 9080 次,相当于每位患者每年就诊一次(IQR 1-3)。在这些就诊者中,5157 人(57%)出院回家,3573 人(39%)入院治疗,350 人(4%)需要转入重症监护室:根据急诊室使用情况,出现了两组患者:529 人(81%)急诊室使用率低,共就诊 2924 次(32%);127 人(19%)急诊室使用率高,共就诊 6156 次(68%)。大量使用急诊室组的患者通常有更高的急诊室就诊风险因素,如年龄较小、SS/Sβ0 基因型或既往急性胸部综合征。他们的精神疾病合并症发病率也明显更高(56% 对 14%,P < 0.001),尤其是焦虑症(40% 对 6%,P < 0.001)。高使用率组的所有患者都有过急诊室就诊的经历,其定义是 3 个月内至少 3 次就诊,且比前 3 个月至少多 3 次。这种突发模式在低使用率组(7% 的患者)中并不常见。讨论我们的研究结果突显了成人 SCD 患者使用急诊室的两种主要模式,其中一小部分患者(19%)占急诊室就诊人数的三分之二以上(68%)。这些高使用率患者的精神科合并症发病率明显更高,而且经常出现急诊室就诊高峰,这强烈预示着短期内的后续就诊。这些发现强调了将精神科支持纳入 SCD 护理并在突发期密切监测患者以防止 ED 复发的重要性。结论更好地了解引发成人 SCD ED 就诊突发的因素可能有助于采取有针对性的干预措施,如精神健康支持,以减少 ED 的使用并改善患者的预后和体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patterns of emergency department utilization in adults with sickle cell disease

Introduction

Acute painful episodes and acute chest syndromes are common complications of sickle cell disease (SCD), often leading to emergency department (ED) visits. ED utilization differs among patients with SCD and varies over time for most individual. Factors such as genotype, age, sex, medication adherence, previous SCD complications, psychiatric comorbidities, and meteorological conditions have been suggested as contributors to this variability. This study aims to identify the main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, and describe associated factors.

Patients and methods

We analyzed data from all adults with SCD followed up at a French reference center and hospitalized at least once between October 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019. We used a Cox model for recurrent events with fixed and time dependent variables to estimate (i) the cumulative risk of ED visits and (ii) its variability over time. We then applied clustering methods on these two dimensions to identify typical patterns of ED utilization and compared the characteristics of individuals across these patterns.

Results

We included 656 adults with SCD, accounting for 9,080 ED visits over a median follow-up of 5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3–6), corresponding to 1 ED visit per patient per year (IQR 1–3). Of these visits, 5,157 (57%) resulted in home discharge, 3,573 (39%) led to hospital admission, and 350 (4%) required transfer to the intensive care unit.
Two clusters of patients emerged, based on their ED utilization: 529 (81%) with low ED use, accounting for 2,924 ED visits (32%); 127 (19%) with high ED use, accounting for 6,156 ED visits (68%). Patients in the high-use group had a higher prevalence of usual risk factors for ED visit, such as younger age, SS/Sβ0 genotype or past acute chest syndrome. They also had a significantly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities (56% vs. 14%, P < 0.001), notably anxious disorders (40% vs. 6%, P < 0.001).
All individuals in the high-use group experienced bursts of ED visits, defined as at least 3 visits within 3 months and at least 3 times more than during the previous 3 months. This burst pattern was uncommon in the low-use group (7% of patients). Among patient prone to bursts, ED visits spaced less than a month apart were followed by a significantly increased risk of a new ED visit within the next month (adjusted hazard ratio 3.49 [95%CI 2.95–4.06]).

Discussion

Our findings highlight two main patterns of ED utilization in adults with SCD, with a small subset of patients (19%) accounting for more than two thirds of ED visits (68%). These high-use patients have a markedly higher prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities and frequently experience bursts of ED visits, which strongly predict subsequent visits in the short term. These findings underscore the importance of integrating psychiatric support into SCD care and closely monitoring patients during burst period, to prevent recurrent ED visits.

Conclusion

Better understanding the factors that trigger bursts of ED visits in adults with SCD may lead to targeted interventions, such as mental health support, aimed at reducing ED utilization and improving patient outcomes and experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revue De Medecine Interne
Revue De Medecine Interne 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
526
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Official journal of the SNFMI, La revue de medecine interne is indexed in the most prestigious databases. It is the most efficient French language journal available for internal medicine specialists who want to expand their knowledge and skills beyond their own discipline. It is also the main French language international medium for French research works. The journal publishes each month editorials, original articles, review articles, short communications, etc. These articles address the fundamental and innumerable facets of internal medicine, spanning all medical specialties. Manuscripts may be submitted in French or in English. La revue de medecine interne also includes additional issues publishing the proceedings of the two annual French meetings of internal medicine (June and December), as well as thematic issues.
期刊最新文献
Editorial board Étude comparative des cytopénies auto-immunes isolées ou dans le cadre d’un syndrome d’Evans au cours du lupus : à propos de 95 observations Caractéristiques et réponse thérapeutique de la maladie d’Erdheim-Chester associée à une néoplasie myéloïde, une étude observationnelle multicentrique Histiocytose langerhansienne extra pulmonaire de l’adulte associée à une leucémie myélomonocytaire chronique : étude descriptive et comparative Diagnostic d’haploinsuffisance en A20 chez des patients avec un diagnostic de lupus : revue systématique de la littérature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1