Allen Green , Shannon D. Francis , Maheen F. Akhter , Rahim S. Nazerali
{"title":"假体乳房再造术合并症指标的比较分析","authors":"Allen Green , Shannon D. Francis , Maheen F. Akhter , Rahim S. Nazerali","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent studies have used comorbidity indexes to stratify postsurgical complication risk across multiple surgical fields, including plastic surgery. However, such studies are lacking in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Understanding how comorbidity scores affect postsurgical outcomes in IBBR can help identify patients who may require additional medical surveillance after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult female patients who underwent IBBR between January 2017 and December 2022 using the Merative™ Marketscan® Research Databases. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to calculate patients’ scores on four different comorbidity indexes. Chi-squared tests were performed for demographic analysis, and multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographic and surgical variables, was conducted to determine associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 16,287 IBBR patients, 3145 (19.3%) experienced a complication within 90 days. On regression analysis, the Modified Frailty Index 5-Item (mFI-5) demonstrated the strongest associations with complications (odds ratio=1.25 [1.18, 1.32]), compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and Modified Frailty Index 11-Item. Further regression analysis revealed that four out of the five mFI-5 comorbidities were independent risk factors for postsurgical complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights important associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse postoperative outcomes in IBBR. mFI-5 demonstrated superior performance in postoperative risk stratification compared to the other indexes analyzed. These findings suggest that using mFI-5 in clinical settings may help identify high comorbidity patients who may benefit from additional monitoring and prophylactic measures. Further research is needed to understand how to mitigate the increased postoperative complication risk in these patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of comorbidity indexes in implant-based breast reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Allen Green , Shannon D. Francis , Maheen F. Akhter , Rahim S. Nazerali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Recent studies have used comorbidity indexes to stratify postsurgical complication risk across multiple surgical fields, including plastic surgery. However, such studies are lacking in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Understanding how comorbidity scores affect postsurgical outcomes in IBBR can help identify patients who may require additional medical surveillance after surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult female patients who underwent IBBR between January 2017 and December 2022 using the Merative™ Marketscan® Research Databases. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to calculate patients’ scores on four different comorbidity indexes. Chi-squared tests were performed for demographic analysis, and multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographic and surgical variables, was conducted to determine associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 16,287 IBBR patients, 3145 (19.3%) experienced a complication within 90 days. On regression analysis, the Modified Frailty Index 5-Item (mFI-5) demonstrated the strongest associations with complications (odds ratio=1.25 [1.18, 1.32]), compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and Modified Frailty Index 11-Item. Further regression analysis revealed that four out of the five mFI-5 comorbidities were independent risk factors for postsurgical complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study highlights important associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse postoperative outcomes in IBBR. mFI-5 demonstrated superior performance in postoperative risk stratification compared to the other indexes analyzed. These findings suggest that using mFI-5 in clinical settings may help identify high comorbidity patients who may benefit from additional monitoring and prophylactic measures. Further research is needed to understand how to mitigate the increased postoperative complication risk in these patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 120-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative analysis of comorbidity indexes in implant-based breast reconstruction
Introduction
Recent studies have used comorbidity indexes to stratify postsurgical complication risk across multiple surgical fields, including plastic surgery. However, such studies are lacking in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Understanding how comorbidity scores affect postsurgical outcomes in IBBR can help identify patients who may require additional medical surveillance after surgery.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult female patients who underwent IBBR between January 2017 and December 2022 using the Merative™ Marketscan® Research Databases. ICD-10 diagnosis codes were used to calculate patients’ scores on four different comorbidity indexes. Chi-squared tests were performed for demographic analysis, and multivariable logistic regression controlling for demographic and surgical variables, was conducted to determine associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse outcomes.
Results
Among 16,287 IBBR patients, 3145 (19.3%) experienced a complication within 90 days. On regression analysis, the Modified Frailty Index 5-Item (mFI-5) demonstrated the strongest associations with complications (odds ratio=1.25 [1.18, 1.32]), compared to the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and Modified Frailty Index 11-Item. Further regression analysis revealed that four out of the five mFI-5 comorbidities were independent risk factors for postsurgical complications.
Conclusion
This study highlights important associations between comorbidity indexes and adverse postoperative outcomes in IBBR. mFI-5 demonstrated superior performance in postoperative risk stratification compared to the other indexes analyzed. These findings suggest that using mFI-5 in clinical settings may help identify high comorbidity patients who may benefit from additional monitoring and prophylactic measures. Further research is needed to understand how to mitigate the increased postoperative complication risk in these patients.
期刊介绍：
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
