如何处理难治性十二指肠缺损?单中心体验。

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Turkish Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476
Tufan Egeli, Özgür Çavdaroğlu, Cihan Ağalar, Serhan Derici, Süleyman Aksoy, İnan Yılmaz, Ali Durubey Çevlik, Tayfun Bişgin, Berke Manoğlu, Mücahit Özbilgin, Tarkan Ünek
{"title":"如何处理难治性十二指肠缺损?单中心体验。","authors":"Tufan Egeli, Özgür Çavdaroğlu, Cihan Ağalar, Serhan Derici, Süleyman Aksoy, İnan Yılmaz, Ali Durubey Çevlik, Tayfun Bişgin, Berke Manoğlu, Mücahit Özbilgin, Tarkan Ünek","doi":"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment methods and outcomes of difficult duodenal defects due to perforation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of patients who had undergone surgery for difficult duodenal defect between January 2012 and November 2022 were collected. Duodenal defect size of 2 cm or more was defined as difficult duodenal defect. Characteristics of the patients, the etiology of perforation, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), surgical treatment, need for re-operation, and morbidity and mortality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were detected. Etiology was peptic ulcer perforation in 12 (63.1%) patients, aortaduodenal fistula in 2 (10.5%), tumor implant in 2 (10.5%), cholecystoduodenal fistula in 1 (5.2%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) in 1 (5.2%), and cholecystectomy related injury in 1 (5.2%) patient. The first surgical procedure was duodenoraphy + omentopexy in 8 (42.1%), Graham repair in 5 (26.3%), duodenal segment 3-4 resection and Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 4 (21.0%), Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 1 (0.5%), and 1 (0.5%) subtotal gastrectomy + duodenum 1<sup>st</sup> part resection + Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, cholecystectomy and external biliary drainage via cystic duct. Four patients who had previously undergone Graham repair (3) and duodenoraphy + omentopexy (1) required salvage surgery. As a salvage surgery; 1 end-to-side and 3 side-to-side Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomies were performed. Overall, mortality occurred in 6 (31.6%) patients. High ASA score and MPI were considered as significant risk factors for mortality (p= 0.015, p= 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary repair techniques can be used in the surgical treatment of difficult duodenal defects when peritonitis is not severe and tensionfree repair is possible. Otherwise, duodenojejunostomy may be preferred as a fast, easy, and safe technique for both initial and salvage surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":23374,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","volume":"40 2","pages":"161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to manage difficult duodenal defects? Single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Tufan Egeli, Özgür Çavdaroğlu, Cihan Ağalar, Serhan Derici, Süleyman Aksoy, İnan Yılmaz, Ali Durubey Çevlik, Tayfun Bişgin, Berke Manoğlu, Mücahit Özbilgin, Tarkan Ünek\",\"doi\":\"10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment methods and outcomes of difficult duodenal defects due to perforation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data of patients who had undergone surgery for difficult duodenal defect between January 2012 and November 2022 were collected. Duodenal defect size of 2 cm or more was defined as difficult duodenal defect. Characteristics of the patients, the etiology of perforation, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), surgical treatment, need for re-operation, and morbidity and mortality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients were detected. Etiology was peptic ulcer perforation in 12 (63.1%) patients, aortaduodenal fistula in 2 (10.5%), tumor implant in 2 (10.5%), cholecystoduodenal fistula in 1 (5.2%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) in 1 (5.2%), and cholecystectomy related injury in 1 (5.2%) patient. The first surgical procedure was duodenoraphy + omentopexy in 8 (42.1%), Graham repair in 5 (26.3%), duodenal segment 3-4 resection and Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 4 (21.0%), Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 1 (0.5%), and 1 (0.5%) subtotal gastrectomy + duodenum 1<sup>st</sup> part resection + Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, cholecystectomy and external biliary drainage via cystic duct. Four patients who had previously undergone Graham repair (3) and duodenoraphy + omentopexy (1) required salvage surgery. As a salvage surgery; 1 end-to-side and 3 side-to-side Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomies were performed. Overall, mortality occurred in 6 (31.6%) patients. High ASA score and MPI were considered as significant risk factors for mortality (p= 0.015, p= 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary repair techniques can be used in the surgical treatment of difficult duodenal defects when peritonitis is not severe and tensionfree repair is possible. Otherwise, duodenojejunostomy may be preferred as a fast, easy, and safe technique for both initial and salvage surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"161-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6476","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨十二指肠穿孔致顽固性十二指肠缺损的手术治疗方法及效果。材料与方法:收集2012年1月至2022年11月行十二指肠难治缺损手术的患者资料。十二指肠缺损尺寸大于等于2cm为十二指肠困难缺损。评估患者的特征、穿孔的病因、美国麻醉学会(ASA)评分、Mannheim腹膜炎指数(MPI)、手术治疗、再次手术的需要、发病率和死亡率。结果:共检出19例。病因为消化性溃疡穿孔12例(63.1%),十二指肠主动脉瘘2例(10.5%),肿瘤植入2例(10.5%),胆囊十二指肠瘘1例(5.2%),内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP) 1例(5.2%),胆囊切除术相关损伤1例(5.2%)。第一种手术方式为十二指肠切除术+网膜切除术8例(42.1%),Graham修复5例(26.3%),十二指肠3-4段切除术+ Roux-en-Y侧十二指肠空肠造瘘4例(21.0%),Roux-en-Y侧十二指肠空肠造瘘1例(0.5%),胃大部切除术+十二指肠第一部分切除术+ Roux-en-Y胃肠造瘘1例(0.5%),胆囊切除术+经胆囊管外胆道引流。4例既往行格雷厄姆修复术(3)和十二指肠造影+网膜固定术(1)的患者需要进行挽救性手术。作为救助性手术;Roux-en-Y型十二指肠空肠端侧吻合1例,侧侧吻合3例。总体而言,6例(31.6%)患者死亡。高ASA评分和MPI被认为是死亡率的重要危险因素(p= 0.015, p= 0.002)。结论:在腹膜炎不严重、无张力修复可行的情况下,一期修复技术可用于手术治疗难治性十二指肠缺损。否则,十二指肠空肠吻合术作为一种快速、简单、安全的技术,可用于初次手术和抢救手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How to manage difficult duodenal defects? Single center experience.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical treatment methods and outcomes of difficult duodenal defects due to perforation.

Material and methods: Data of patients who had undergone surgery for difficult duodenal defect between January 2012 and November 2022 were collected. Duodenal defect size of 2 cm or more was defined as difficult duodenal defect. Characteristics of the patients, the etiology of perforation, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, Mannheim peritonitis index (MPI), surgical treatment, need for re-operation, and morbidity and mortality were evaluated.

Results: Nineteen patients were detected. Etiology was peptic ulcer perforation in 12 (63.1%) patients, aortaduodenal fistula in 2 (10.5%), tumor implant in 2 (10.5%), cholecystoduodenal fistula in 1 (5.2%), endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) in 1 (5.2%), and cholecystectomy related injury in 1 (5.2%) patient. The first surgical procedure was duodenoraphy + omentopexy in 8 (42.1%), Graham repair in 5 (26.3%), duodenal segment 3-4 resection and Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 4 (21.0%), Roux-en-Y side to side duodenojejunostomy in 1 (0.5%), and 1 (0.5%) subtotal gastrectomy + duodenum 1st part resection + Roux-en-Y gastroenterostomy, cholecystectomy and external biliary drainage via cystic duct. Four patients who had previously undergone Graham repair (3) and duodenoraphy + omentopexy (1) required salvage surgery. As a salvage surgery; 1 end-to-side and 3 side-to-side Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomies were performed. Overall, mortality occurred in 6 (31.6%) patients. High ASA score and MPI were considered as significant risk factors for mortality (p= 0.015, p= 0.002).

Conclusion: Primary repair techniques can be used in the surgical treatment of difficult duodenal defects when peritonitis is not severe and tensionfree repair is possible. Otherwise, duodenojejunostomy may be preferred as a fast, easy, and safe technique for both initial and salvage surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Juvenile papillomatosis: A case report. Inferior vena cava injuries: Are we doing what we really must? Laparoscopic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary carcinoma: An experience of 50 cases from a single tertiary care center. Pancreatic fistula and bleeding following choledochal cyst excision: Experience of two decades. Predictors of citations and altmetric scores in general surgery literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1