对不同运动相干性的宽带视觉刺激的眼跟随反应。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1167/jov.24.13.4
Boris M Sheliga, Edmond J FitzGibbon, Christian Quaia, Richard J Krauzlis
{"title":"对不同运动相干性的宽带视觉刺激的眼跟随反应。","authors":"Boris M Sheliga, Edmond J FitzGibbon, Christian Quaia, Richard J Krauzlis","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.13.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Manipulations of the strength of visual motion coherence have been widely used to study behavioral and neural mechanisms of visual motion processing. Here, we used a novel broadband visual stimulus to test how the strength of motion coherence in different spatial frequency (SF) bands impacts human ocular-following responses (OFRs). Synthesized broadband stimuli were used: a sum of one-dimensional vertical sine-wave gratings (SWs) whose SFs ranged from 0.0625 to 4 cpd in 0.05-log2(cpd) steps. Every 20 ms a proportion of SWs (from 25% to 100%) shifted in the same direction by ¼ of their respective wavelengths (drifting), whereas the rest of the SWs were assigned a random phase (flicker), shifted by half of their respective wavelengths (counterphase), or remained stationary (static): 25% to 100% motion coherence. As expected, the magnitude of the OFRs decreased as the proportion of non-drifting SWs and/or their contrast increased. The effects, however, were SF dependent. For flicker and static SWs, SFs in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 cpd were the most disruptive, whereas, with counterphase SWs, low SFs were the most disruptive. The data were well fit by a model that combined an excitatory drive determined by a SF-weighted sum of drifting components scaled by a SF-weighted contrast normalization term. Flicker, counterphase, or static SWs did not add to or directly impede the drive in the model, but they contributed to the contrast normalization process.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 13","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ocular-following responses to broadband visual stimuli of varying motion coherence.\",\"authors\":\"Boris M Sheliga, Edmond J FitzGibbon, Christian Quaia, Richard J Krauzlis\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.24.13.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Manipulations of the strength of visual motion coherence have been widely used to study behavioral and neural mechanisms of visual motion processing. Here, we used a novel broadband visual stimulus to test how the strength of motion coherence in different spatial frequency (SF) bands impacts human ocular-following responses (OFRs). Synthesized broadband stimuli were used: a sum of one-dimensional vertical sine-wave gratings (SWs) whose SFs ranged from 0.0625 to 4 cpd in 0.05-log2(cpd) steps. Every 20 ms a proportion of SWs (from 25% to 100%) shifted in the same direction by ¼ of their respective wavelengths (drifting), whereas the rest of the SWs were assigned a random phase (flicker), shifted by half of their respective wavelengths (counterphase), or remained stationary (static): 25% to 100% motion coherence. As expected, the magnitude of the OFRs decreased as the proportion of non-drifting SWs and/or their contrast increased. The effects, however, were SF dependent. For flicker and static SWs, SFs in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 cpd were the most disruptive, whereas, with counterphase SWs, low SFs were the most disruptive. The data were well fit by a model that combined an excitatory drive determined by a SF-weighted sum of drifting components scaled by a SF-weighted contrast normalization term. Flicker, counterphase, or static SWs did not add to or directly impede the drive in the model, but they contributed to the contrast normalization process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"24 13\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11627248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.13.4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.13.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

操纵视觉运动连贯的强度已被广泛用于研究视觉运动加工的行为和神经机制。在这里,我们使用了一种新的宽带视觉刺激来测试不同空间频率(SF)波段的运动相干性强度如何影响人类的眼球跟随反应(ofr)。采用合成宽带刺激:在0.05-log2(cpd)步长中,sf范围为0.0625 ~ 4 cpd的一维垂直正弦波光栅(SWs)之和。每隔20毫秒,一定比例的SWs(从25%到100%)以各自波长的¼向同一方向移动(漂移),而其余的SWs被分配一个随机相位(闪烁),移动各自波长的一半(反相位),或保持静止(静态):25%到100%运动相干性。正如预期的那样,ofr的大小随着非漂移SWs的比例和/或其对比度的增加而减小。然而,这些影响是依赖于SF的。对于闪烁和静态SWs, 0.3 ~ 0.6 cpd范围内的SFs是最具破坏性的,而对于反相SWs,低SFs是最具破坏性的。数据很好地拟合了一个模型,该模型结合了由sf加权漂移分量和(由sf加权对比度归一化项缩放)确定的兴奋驱动。闪烁、反相或静态SWs不会增加或直接阻碍模型中的驱动,但它们有助于对比度归一化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ocular-following responses to broadband visual stimuli of varying motion coherence.

Manipulations of the strength of visual motion coherence have been widely used to study behavioral and neural mechanisms of visual motion processing. Here, we used a novel broadband visual stimulus to test how the strength of motion coherence in different spatial frequency (SF) bands impacts human ocular-following responses (OFRs). Synthesized broadband stimuli were used: a sum of one-dimensional vertical sine-wave gratings (SWs) whose SFs ranged from 0.0625 to 4 cpd in 0.05-log2(cpd) steps. Every 20 ms a proportion of SWs (from 25% to 100%) shifted in the same direction by ¼ of their respective wavelengths (drifting), whereas the rest of the SWs were assigned a random phase (flicker), shifted by half of their respective wavelengths (counterphase), or remained stationary (static): 25% to 100% motion coherence. As expected, the magnitude of the OFRs decreased as the proportion of non-drifting SWs and/or their contrast increased. The effects, however, were SF dependent. For flicker and static SWs, SFs in the range of 0.3 to 0.6 cpd were the most disruptive, whereas, with counterphase SWs, low SFs were the most disruptive. The data were well fit by a model that combined an excitatory drive determined by a SF-weighted sum of drifting components scaled by a SF-weighted contrast normalization term. Flicker, counterphase, or static SWs did not add to or directly impede the drive in the model, but they contributed to the contrast normalization process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Impaired visual perceptual accuracy in the upper visual field induces asymmetric performance in position estimation for falling and rising objects. Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: The role of target speed and acceleration. Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and neural networks. Effect of sign language learning on temporal resolution of visual attention. Improving the reliability and accuracy of population receptive field measures using a logarithmically warped stimulus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1