低风险和高风险决策的不同神经基础:来自气球模拟风险任务的证据。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Topography Pub Date : 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s10548-024-01094-8
Zhenlan Jin, Simeng Li, Changan Wang, Xiaoqian Chai, Junjun Zhang, Ling Li
{"title":"低风险和高风险决策的不同神经基础:来自气球模拟风险任务的证据。","authors":"Zhenlan Jin, Simeng Li, Changan Wang, Xiaoqian Chai, Junjun Zhang, Ling Li","doi":"10.1007/s10548-024-01094-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Human beings exhibit varying risk-taking behaviors in response to different risk levels. Despite numerous studies on risk-taking in decision-making, the neural mechanisms of decision-making regarding risk levels remains unclear. To investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in risk-taking under different risk-levels, we analyzed behavioral data of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data of healthy participants (22-39 years, N = 93) from the University of California, Los Angeles Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics dataset. In the BART, the participants decided to pump for more points or stop pumping to avoid explosion of the balloons, where the risk level was manipulated by the explosion likelihood which was distinguished by the balloon color (blue for low-, red for high- risk condition). Compared with low-risk condition, the participants pumped less number, exploded more balloons, and showed more variability in pump numbers in high-risk condition, demonstrating the effective manipulation of the risky level. Next, resting state features and functional connectivity (rsFC) strength were associated with behavioral measures in low- and high-risk conditions. We found that the explosion number of balloons were correlated with the low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L. DLPFC), the rsFC strength between L. DLPFC and the left anterior orbital gyrus in the low-risk condition. In the high-risk condition, we found variability in pump numbers was correlated with the ALFF in the left middle/superior frontal gyrus, the fractional ALFF (fALFF) in the medial segment of precentral gyrus (M. PrG), and the rsFC strength between the M. PrG and bilateral precentral gyrus. Our results highlighted significance of the L. DLPFC in lower risky decision making and the precentral gyrus in higher risky decision making, suggesting that distinctive neural correlates underlie the individual differences of decision-making under different risk level.</p>","PeriodicalId":55329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Topography","volume":"38 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distinctive Neural Substrates of low and high Risky Decision Making: Evidence from the Balloon Analog Risk Task.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenlan Jin, Simeng Li, Changan Wang, Xiaoqian Chai, Junjun Zhang, Ling Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10548-024-01094-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Human beings exhibit varying risk-taking behaviors in response to different risk levels. Despite numerous studies on risk-taking in decision-making, the neural mechanisms of decision-making regarding risk levels remains unclear. To investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in risk-taking under different risk-levels, we analyzed behavioral data of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data of healthy participants (22-39 years, N = 93) from the University of California, Los Angeles Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics dataset. In the BART, the participants decided to pump for more points or stop pumping to avoid explosion of the balloons, where the risk level was manipulated by the explosion likelihood which was distinguished by the balloon color (blue for low-, red for high- risk condition). Compared with low-risk condition, the participants pumped less number, exploded more balloons, and showed more variability in pump numbers in high-risk condition, demonstrating the effective manipulation of the risky level. Next, resting state features and functional connectivity (rsFC) strength were associated with behavioral measures in low- and high-risk conditions. We found that the explosion number of balloons were correlated with the low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L. DLPFC), the rsFC strength between L. DLPFC and the left anterior orbital gyrus in the low-risk condition. In the high-risk condition, we found variability in pump numbers was correlated with the ALFF in the left middle/superior frontal gyrus, the fractional ALFF (fALFF) in the medial segment of precentral gyrus (M. PrG), and the rsFC strength between the M. PrG and bilateral precentral gyrus. Our results highlighted significance of the L. DLPFC in lower risky decision making and the precentral gyrus in higher risky decision making, suggesting that distinctive neural correlates underlie the individual differences of decision-making under different risk level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Topography\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Topography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01094-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Topography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01094-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类在不同的风险水平下表现出不同的冒险行为。尽管对决策中的冒险行为进行了大量研究,但风险水平对决策的神经机制仍不清楚。为了探讨不同风险水平下个体冒险行为差异的神经相关性,我们分析了来自加州大学洛杉矶分校神经精神表型组学联盟数据集的健康参与者(22-39岁,N = 93)的气球模拟风险任务(BART)行为数据和静息状态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)数据。在BART中,参与者决定抽更多的分数或停止抽以避免气球爆炸,其中风险水平由气球颜色区分的爆炸可能性来控制(蓝色代表低风险,红色代表高风险)。与低风险条件相比,参与者抽气次数更少,吹气次数更多,高风险条件下抽气次数变异性更大,表明风险水平被有效操纵。接下来,静息状态特征和功能连接(rsFC)强度与低高风险条件下的行为测量相关。结果表明,低风险条件下,气球爆炸次数与左背外侧前额叶皮层(L. DLPFC)低频波动(ALFF)、左背外侧前额叶皮层与左眶前回之间的rsFC强度相关。在高危状态下,我们发现泵数量的变化与左侧额上中回的ALFF、中央前回内侧段的ALFF分数(fALFF)以及M. PrG和双侧中央前回之间的rsFC强度相关。我们的研究结果强调了L. DLPFC在低风险决策中的重要性和中央前回在高风险决策中的重要性,表明不同风险水平下决策的个体差异背后存在不同的神经关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distinctive Neural Substrates of low and high Risky Decision Making: Evidence from the Balloon Analog Risk Task.

Human beings exhibit varying risk-taking behaviors in response to different risk levels. Despite numerous studies on risk-taking in decision-making, the neural mechanisms of decision-making regarding risk levels remains unclear. To investigate the neural correlates of individual differences in risk-taking under different risk-levels, we analyzed behavioral data of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) and resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data of healthy participants (22-39 years, N = 93) from the University of California, Los Angeles Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics dataset. In the BART, the participants decided to pump for more points or stop pumping to avoid explosion of the balloons, where the risk level was manipulated by the explosion likelihood which was distinguished by the balloon color (blue for low-, red for high- risk condition). Compared with low-risk condition, the participants pumped less number, exploded more balloons, and showed more variability in pump numbers in high-risk condition, demonstrating the effective manipulation of the risky level. Next, resting state features and functional connectivity (rsFC) strength were associated with behavioral measures in low- and high-risk conditions. We found that the explosion number of balloons were correlated with the low frequency fluctuations (ALFF) in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L. DLPFC), the rsFC strength between L. DLPFC and the left anterior orbital gyrus in the low-risk condition. In the high-risk condition, we found variability in pump numbers was correlated with the ALFF in the left middle/superior frontal gyrus, the fractional ALFF (fALFF) in the medial segment of precentral gyrus (M. PrG), and the rsFC strength between the M. PrG and bilateral precentral gyrus. Our results highlighted significance of the L. DLPFC in lower risky decision making and the precentral gyrus in higher risky decision making, suggesting that distinctive neural correlates underlie the individual differences of decision-making under different risk level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Topography
Brain Topography 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Topography publishes clinical and basic research on cognitive neuroscience and functional neurophysiology using the full range of imaging techniques including EEG, MEG, fMRI, TMS, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, intracranial recordings, lesion studies, and related methods. Submissions combining multiple techniques are particularly encouraged, as well as reports of new and innovative methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Eeg Microstates and Balance Parameters for Stroke Discrimination: A Machine Learning Approach. Individuals' Food Preferences can be Influenced by the Music Styles: An ERP Study. Relational Integration Training Modulated the Frontoparietal Network for Fluid Intelligence: An EEG Microstates Study. Altered Static and Dynamic Functional Network Connectivity and Combined Machine Learning in Stroke. Network Abnormalities in Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis of Resting-State Functional Connectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1