一项随机对照试验:母乳气味、便利收纳和非营养性吸吮对贴足期早产儿疼痛和生理参数影响的比较

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breastfeeding Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1089/bfm.2024.0123
Negarin Akbari, Birsen Mutlu, Homeira Khoddam
{"title":"一项随机对照试验:母乳气味、便利收纳和非营养性吸吮对贴足期早产儿疼痛和生理参数影响的比较","authors":"Negarin Akbari, Birsen Mutlu, Homeira Khoddam","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2024.0123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently undergo painful procedures, which can lead to both short-term and long-term complications, including potential mortality. Effective pain management is crucial in this context. Although numerous studies have explored non-pharmacological pain relief methods for preterm infants, no research has simultaneously compared the effects of maternal breast milk odor, facilitated tucking, and nonnutritive sucking. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> This study aims to comparatively investigate the efficacy of nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor in reducing pain in preterm neonates during heel sticks. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary-level NICU with 144 preterm neonates (gestational age 31-36 weeks) requiring heel sticks. The infants were randomly assigned to four groups: control, nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor. Pain and physiological parameters were assessed through video recordings of the procedures and scored at 1-minute intervals using the Premature Infant Pain Profile and Data Evaluation Form. Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 minutes before, during, and after the heel stick. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study found significant effects of the interventions on physiological parameters and pain (heart rate: <i>F</i> = 7.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001; oxygen saturation: <i>F</i> = 16.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001; respiratory rate: <i>F</i> = 6.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001; pain: <i>F</i> = 61.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Facilitated tucking resulted in significantly lower pain scores (6.61 ± 1.44) compared with the control group (14.22 ± 3.61), maternal breast milk odor (12.22 ± 3.08), and nonnutritive sucking (10.41 ± 1.71) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> All interventions demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining physiological stability and alleviating pain. Nevertheless, the intervention identified as most effective in reducing pain was facilitated tucking group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the Effect of Maternal Breast Milk Odor, Facilitated Tucking, and Nonnutritive Sucking Applied to Preterm Neonates During Heel Stick on Pain and Physiological Parameters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Negarin Akbari, Birsen Mutlu, Homeira Khoddam\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bfm.2024.0123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently undergo painful procedures, which can lead to both short-term and long-term complications, including potential mortality. Effective pain management is crucial in this context. Although numerous studies have explored non-pharmacological pain relief methods for preterm infants, no research has simultaneously compared the effects of maternal breast milk odor, facilitated tucking, and nonnutritive sucking. <b><i>Aim:</i></b> This study aims to comparatively investigate the efficacy of nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor in reducing pain in preterm neonates during heel sticks. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary-level NICU with 144 preterm neonates (gestational age 31-36 weeks) requiring heel sticks. The infants were randomly assigned to four groups: control, nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor. Pain and physiological parameters were assessed through video recordings of the procedures and scored at 1-minute intervals using the Premature Infant Pain Profile and Data Evaluation Form. Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 minutes before, during, and after the heel stick. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The study found significant effects of the interventions on physiological parameters and pain (heart rate: <i>F</i> = 7.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001; oxygen saturation: <i>F</i> = 16.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001; respiratory rate: <i>F</i> = 6.56, <i>p</i> < 0.001; pain: <i>F</i> = 61.45, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Facilitated tucking resulted in significantly lower pain scores (6.61 ± 1.44) compared with the control group (14.22 ± 3.61), maternal breast milk odor (12.22 ± 3.08), and nonnutritive sucking (10.41 ± 1.71) (<i>p</i> < 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> All interventions demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining physiological stability and alleviating pain. Nevertheless, the intervention identified as most effective in reducing pain was facilitated tucking group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2024.0123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的早产儿经常经历痛苦的手术,这可能导致短期和长期的并发症,包括潜在的死亡。在这种情况下,有效的疼痛管理至关重要。尽管许多研究已经探索了非药物缓解早产儿疼痛的方法,但没有研究同时比较了母乳气味、便利收纳和非营养性吸吮的效果。目的:比较探讨非营养性吸吮、方便收纳和母乳气味对减轻早产儿贴足时疼痛的效果。方法:对144例(胎龄31-36周)需要跟棒治疗的新生儿进行随机对照试验。这些婴儿被随机分为四组:对照组、非营养性吸吮组、方便吸吮组和有母乳气味组。通过录像对疼痛和生理参数进行评估,并每隔1分钟使用早产儿疼痛档案和数据评估表进行评分。数据收集于基线和1、2、3分钟之前,期间和之后的跟贴。结果:研究发现干预措施对生理参数和疼痛有显著影响(心率:F = 7.5, p < 0.001;血氧饱和度:F = 16.39, p < 0.001;呼吸频率:F = 6.56, p < 0.001;疼痛:F = 61.45, p < 0.001)。方便吸吮组疼痛评分(6.61±1.44)明显低于对照组(14.22±3.61)、母乳气味评分(12.22±3.08)和非营养性吸吮评分(10.41±1.71)(p < 0.001)。结论:所有干预措施均能有效维持生理稳定和减轻疼痛。然而,在减轻疼痛方面最有效的干预措施是便利收纳组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of the Effect of Maternal Breast Milk Odor, Facilitated Tucking, and Nonnutritive Sucking Applied to Preterm Neonates During Heel Stick on Pain and Physiological Parameters: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) frequently undergo painful procedures, which can lead to both short-term and long-term complications, including potential mortality. Effective pain management is crucial in this context. Although numerous studies have explored non-pharmacological pain relief methods for preterm infants, no research has simultaneously compared the effects of maternal breast milk odor, facilitated tucking, and nonnutritive sucking. Aim: This study aims to comparatively investigate the efficacy of nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor in reducing pain in preterm neonates during heel sticks. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a tertiary-level NICU with 144 preterm neonates (gestational age 31-36 weeks) requiring heel sticks. The infants were randomly assigned to four groups: control, nonnutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, and maternal breast milk odor. Pain and physiological parameters were assessed through video recordings of the procedures and scored at 1-minute intervals using the Premature Infant Pain Profile and Data Evaluation Form. Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 2, and 3 minutes before, during, and after the heel stick. Results: The study found significant effects of the interventions on physiological parameters and pain (heart rate: F = 7.5, p < 0.001; oxygen saturation: F = 16.39, p < 0.001; respiratory rate: F = 6.56, p < 0.001; pain: F = 61.45, p < 0.001). Facilitated tucking resulted in significantly lower pain scores (6.61 ± 1.44) compared with the control group (14.22 ± 3.61), maternal breast milk odor (12.22 ± 3.08), and nonnutritive sucking (10.41 ± 1.71) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: All interventions demonstrated effectiveness in maintaining physiological stability and alleviating pain. Nevertheless, the intervention identified as most effective in reducing pain was facilitated tucking group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
相关文献
二甲双胍通过HDAC6和FoxO3a转录调控肌肉生长抑制素诱导肌肉萎缩
IF 8.9 1区 医学Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and MusclePub Date : 2021-11-02 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.12833
Min Ju Kang, Ji Wook Moon, Jung Ok Lee, Ji Hae Kim, Eun Jeong Jung, Su Jin Kim, Joo Yeon Oh, Sang Woo Wu, Pu Reum Lee, Sun Hwa Park, Hyeon Soo Kim
具有疾病敏感单倍型的非亲属供体脐带血移植后的1型糖尿病
IF 3.2 3区 医学Journal of Diabetes InvestigationPub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI: 10.1111/jdi.13939
Kensuke Matsumoto, Taisuke Matsuyama, Ritsu Sumiyoshi, Matsuo Takuji, Tadashi Yamamoto, Ryosuke Shirasaki, Haruko Tashiro
封面:蛋白质组学分析确定IRSp53和fastin是PRV输出和直接细胞-细胞传播的关键
IF 3.4 4区 生物学ProteomicsPub Date : 2019-12-02 DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201970201
Fei-Long Yu, Huan Miao, Jinjin Xia, Fan Jia, Huadong Wang, Fuqiang Xu, Lin Guo
来源期刊
Breastfeeding Medicine
Breastfeeding Medicine OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols. Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes: Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols Health consequences of artificial feeding Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother Breastfeeding indications and contraindications Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity International public health issues including social and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of Using Point-of-Care Biomarkers of Secretory Activation to Address Early, Unplanned Weaning Among Healthy, Term Dyads in Community Settings: A Pilot Study. Influence of Race and Ethnicity on Meeting Intention to Exclusively Breast Milk Feed at Postpartum Hospital Discharge. The Effect of Breast Massage and Warm Compress Application on Milk Production and Anxiety in Mothers with Premature Newborn: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Satisfaction with Breastfeeding and Not Frequency of Feeding is Associated with a Reduction of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms. Association Between Different Feeding Methods and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Preterm Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1