法律障碍危及个体化医学研究——来自北欧风湿病学合作的经验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Scandinavian Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1177/14034948231212711
Bente Glintborg, Mats Hansson, Hilde Berner Hammer, Lars Klareskog, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Helga Westerlind, Johan Rönnelid, Isabel Gehring, Mikael Benson, Bente Appel Esbensen, Merete Lund Hetland, Leonid Padyukov, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Barbara Bislawska AxnÄs, Niels Steen Krogh, Martina Johannesson, Johan Askling
{"title":"法律障碍危及个体化医学研究——来自北欧风湿病学合作的经验。","authors":"Bente Glintborg, Mats Hansson, Hilde Berner Hammer, Lars Klareskog, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Helga Westerlind, Johan Rönnelid, Isabel Gehring, Mikael Benson, Bente Appel Esbensen, Merete Lund Hetland, Leonid Padyukov, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Barbara Bislawska AxnÄs, Niels Steen Krogh, Martina Johannesson, Johan Askling","doi":"10.1177/14034948231212711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Personalised medicine in chronic complex diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is within reach but requires international multi-stakeholder collaboration. We exemplify how national implementations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have introduced administrative delays and created disincentives for data sharing and collaborative research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our Danish/Swedish/Norwegian research collaboration (the 3-year NordForsk-funded \"NORA\" project) aims to develop a personalised medicine approach for the management of RA, built on the exploitation of unique existing data sources: longitudinal data from clinical rheumatology registries, research cohorts, nationwide health care registries, and biobank material from >20 sample collections. Data and results are shared and accessed remotely by collaborators at secure servers. New biomarker assays and patient-centric implementations of the results are to be explored, validated, and disseminated to patients and health care via the development of digital tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the advice of legal experts at the involved academic or public institutions and private companies, GDPR compliance resulted in >20 legal documents to govern the collaboration (consortium-, joint controller-, research collaboration-, data sharing-, and a series of unique two-way data processing-, and material transfer agreements). Lack of agreed-upon templates, policies, procedures, and a shortage of legal resources have caused considerable delays. Thus, our research consortium has spent more time ensuring GDPR compliance than on actual research activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\n <b>The current interpretation and implementation of the legal premises (rather than the GDPR per se) for research collaborations caused unnecessary barriers and delays. Our experiences call for Nordic trust-based code-of-conduct-like framework agreements, and for harmonisation of procedures and templates, lest the Nordic advantage in research be lost.</b>\n </p>","PeriodicalId":49568,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","volume":"52 8","pages":"1019-1025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal obstacles jeopardise research in personalised medicine - experiences from a Nordic collaboration within rheumatology.\",\"authors\":\"Bente Glintborg, Mats Hansson, Hilde Berner Hammer, Lars Klareskog, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Helga Westerlind, Johan Rönnelid, Isabel Gehring, Mikael Benson, Bente Appel Esbensen, Merete Lund Hetland, Leonid Padyukov, Tue Wenzel Kragstrup, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Barbara Bislawska AxnÄs, Niels Steen Krogh, Martina Johannesson, Johan Askling\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14034948231212711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Personalised medicine in chronic complex diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is within reach but requires international multi-stakeholder collaboration. We exemplify how national implementations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have introduced administrative delays and created disincentives for data sharing and collaborative research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our Danish/Swedish/Norwegian research collaboration (the 3-year NordForsk-funded \\\"NORA\\\" project) aims to develop a personalised medicine approach for the management of RA, built on the exploitation of unique existing data sources: longitudinal data from clinical rheumatology registries, research cohorts, nationwide health care registries, and biobank material from >20 sample collections. Data and results are shared and accessed remotely by collaborators at secure servers. New biomarker assays and patient-centric implementations of the results are to be explored, validated, and disseminated to patients and health care via the development of digital tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the advice of legal experts at the involved academic or public institutions and private companies, GDPR compliance resulted in >20 legal documents to govern the collaboration (consortium-, joint controller-, research collaboration-, data sharing-, and a series of unique two-way data processing-, and material transfer agreements). Lack of agreed-upon templates, policies, procedures, and a shortage of legal resources have caused considerable delays. Thus, our research consortium has spent more time ensuring GDPR compliance than on actual research activities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>\\n <b>The current interpretation and implementation of the legal premises (rather than the GDPR per se) for research collaborations caused unnecessary barriers and delays. Our experiences call for Nordic trust-based code-of-conduct-like framework agreements, and for harmonisation of procedures and templates, lest the Nordic advantage in research be lost.</b>\\n </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"52 8\",\"pages\":\"1019-1025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231212711\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948231212711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:类风湿关节炎(RA)等慢性复杂疾病的个体化治疗是可以实现的,但需要国际多方利益相关者的合作。我们举例说明了《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的国家实施如何导致行政延误,并对数据共享和合作研究造成阻碍。方法:我们的丹麦/瑞典/挪威研究合作(为期3年的nordforsk资助的“NORA”项目)旨在开发一种用于RA管理的个性化医学方法,建立在利用独特的现有数据源的基础上:来自临床风湿病登记处的纵向数据,研究队列,全国卫生保健登记处,以及来自bbb20样本收集的生物库材料。数据和结果由安全服务器上的协作者远程共享和访问。新的生物标志物分析和以患者为中心的结果实施将被探索、验证,并通过数字工具的开发传播给患者和医疗保健。结果:根据相关学术或公共机构和私营公司法律专家的建议,GDPR合规导致了bbbb20个法律文件来管理合作(财团-,联合控制器-,研究合作-,数据共享-以及一系列独特的双向数据处理-和材料转让协议)。缺乏商定的模板、政策、程序和缺乏法律资源造成了相当大的延误。因此,我们的研究联盟花费了比实际研究活动更多的时间来确保GDPR合规性。结论:目前对研究合作的法律前提(而不是GDPR本身)的解释和实施造成了不必要的障碍和延误。我们的经验要求北欧建立以信任为基础的类似行为准则的框架协议,并协调程序和模板,以免北欧在研究方面的优势丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Legal obstacles jeopardise research in personalised medicine - experiences from a Nordic collaboration within rheumatology.

Aims: Personalised medicine in chronic complex diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is within reach but requires international multi-stakeholder collaboration. We exemplify how national implementations of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) have introduced administrative delays and created disincentives for data sharing and collaborative research.

Methods: Our Danish/Swedish/Norwegian research collaboration (the 3-year NordForsk-funded "NORA" project) aims to develop a personalised medicine approach for the management of RA, built on the exploitation of unique existing data sources: longitudinal data from clinical rheumatology registries, research cohorts, nationwide health care registries, and biobank material from >20 sample collections. Data and results are shared and accessed remotely by collaborators at secure servers. New biomarker assays and patient-centric implementations of the results are to be explored, validated, and disseminated to patients and health care via the development of digital tools.

Results: Following the advice of legal experts at the involved academic or public institutions and private companies, GDPR compliance resulted in >20 legal documents to govern the collaboration (consortium-, joint controller-, research collaboration-, data sharing-, and a series of unique two-way data processing-, and material transfer agreements). Lack of agreed-upon templates, policies, procedures, and a shortage of legal resources have caused considerable delays. Thus, our research consortium has spent more time ensuring GDPR compliance than on actual research activities.

Conclusions: The current interpretation and implementation of the legal premises (rather than the GDPR per se) for research collaborations caused unnecessary barriers and delays. Our experiences call for Nordic trust-based code-of-conduct-like framework agreements, and for harmonisation of procedures and templates, lest the Nordic advantage in research be lost.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
135
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Public Health is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a vision to: publish public health research of good quality; contribute to the conceptual and methodological development of public health; contribute to global health issues; contribute to news and overviews of public health developments and health policy developments in the Nordic countries; reflect the multidisciplinarity of public health.
期刊最新文献
A taste of ambrosia: Do Olympic medalists live longer than Olympic losers? The diagnosis of cerebral palsy in two Danish national registries: a validation study. Meaningfulness and mortality: exploring the sense of coherence in Eastern Finnish men. What is wellness? Investigating the importance of different domains of wellness among laypeople and experts: A survey study. Validation of the short version of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for adolescents in Norway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1