{"title":"在七个核磁共振兼容电离室模型的临床核磁共振直线光束中实验测量的磁场质量转换因子。","authors":"Nathan Orlando, Jennie Crosby, Carri Glide-Hurst, Wesley Culberson, Arman Sarfehnia","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this work was to experimentally quantify MR-compatible ionization chamber response for 1.5T Elekta Unity and 0.35T ViewRay MRIdian MR-linac systems through the determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, k<sub>B,Q</sub>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models from Standard Imaging and PTW were evaluated. Both the quality conversion factor k<sub>Q</sub> and the magnetic field quality conversion factor k<sub>B,Q</sub> were experimentally determined through a cross-calibration method. Specifically, the ratio of absorbed dose measured with a reference A1SL chamber under reference conditions to corrected output measured with each test chamber at the same point of measurement allowed for the determination of k<sub>B,Q</sub>. The angular dependence of the magnetic field quality conversion factor for MR-compatible chamber models was assessed for the 1.5T Elekta Unity system by measuring k<sub>B,Q</sub> with the chamber axis and magnetic field direction aligned at cardinal angles (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beam quality conversion (k<sub>Q</sub>) factors for MR-compatible ionization chambers measured in a standard linac beam showed an average percent difference of -0.09 ± 0.18% compared to computed k<sub>Q</sub> values for their conventional chamber versions. Similarly, magnetic field quality conversion (k<sub>B,Q</sub>) factors for corresponding MR and non-MR ionization chamber models measured using the same cross-calibration technique demonstrated average percent differences of -0.1 ± 0.3% and 0.0 ± 0.2% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively. Investigation of the angular dependence of this correction factor demonstrated identical chamber response for equivalent MR-compatible and conventional chamber models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work provides critical experimental validation of MR-compatible ionization chamber performance, with a direct comparison of measured k<sub>B,Q</sub> values to corresponding conventional chamber models demonstrating nearly equivalent chamber response. k<sub>B,Q</sub> values determined using our experimental method will serve as an important reference for upcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols and ultimately represent an important step towards accurate output calibration of MR-linac systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Magnetic field quality conversion factors experimentally measured in clinical MR-linac beams for seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Orlando, Jennie Crosby, Carri Glide-Hurst, Wesley Culberson, Arman Sarfehnia\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14613\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this work was to experimentally quantify MR-compatible ionization chamber response for 1.5T Elekta Unity and 0.35T ViewRay MRIdian MR-linac systems through the determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, k<sub>B,Q</sub>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models from Standard Imaging and PTW were evaluated. Both the quality conversion factor k<sub>Q</sub> and the magnetic field quality conversion factor k<sub>B,Q</sub> were experimentally determined through a cross-calibration method. Specifically, the ratio of absorbed dose measured with a reference A1SL chamber under reference conditions to corrected output measured with each test chamber at the same point of measurement allowed for the determination of k<sub>B,Q</sub>. The angular dependence of the magnetic field quality conversion factor for MR-compatible chamber models was assessed for the 1.5T Elekta Unity system by measuring k<sub>B,Q</sub> with the chamber axis and magnetic field direction aligned at cardinal angles (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Beam quality conversion (k<sub>Q</sub>) factors for MR-compatible ionization chambers measured in a standard linac beam showed an average percent difference of -0.09 ± 0.18% compared to computed k<sub>Q</sub> values for their conventional chamber versions. Similarly, magnetic field quality conversion (k<sub>B,Q</sub>) factors for corresponding MR and non-MR ionization chamber models measured using the same cross-calibration technique demonstrated average percent differences of -0.1 ± 0.3% and 0.0 ± 0.2% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively. Investigation of the angular dependence of this correction factor demonstrated identical chamber response for equivalent MR-compatible and conventional chamber models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work provides critical experimental validation of MR-compatible ionization chamber performance, with a direct comparison of measured k<sub>B,Q</sub> values to corresponding conventional chamber models demonstrating nearly equivalent chamber response. k<sub>B,Q</sub> values determined using our experimental method will serve as an important reference for upcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols and ultimately represent an important step towards accurate output calibration of MR-linac systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14613\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14613","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Magnetic field quality conversion factors experimentally measured in clinical MR-linac beams for seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models.
Purpose: The purpose of this work was to experimentally quantify MR-compatible ionization chamber response for 1.5T Elekta Unity and 0.35T ViewRay MRIdian MR-linac systems through the determination of the magnetic field quality conversion factor, kB,Q.
Methods: Seven MR-compatible ionization chamber models from Standard Imaging and PTW were evaluated. Both the quality conversion factor kQ and the magnetic field quality conversion factor kB,Q were experimentally determined through a cross-calibration method. Specifically, the ratio of absorbed dose measured with a reference A1SL chamber under reference conditions to corrected output measured with each test chamber at the same point of measurement allowed for the determination of kB,Q. The angular dependence of the magnetic field quality conversion factor for MR-compatible chamber models was assessed for the 1.5T Elekta Unity system by measuring kB,Q with the chamber axis and magnetic field direction aligned at cardinal angles (0°, 90°, 180°, 270°).
Results: Beam quality conversion (kQ) factors for MR-compatible ionization chambers measured in a standard linac beam showed an average percent difference of -0.09 ± 0.18% compared to computed kQ values for their conventional chamber versions. Similarly, magnetic field quality conversion (kB,Q) factors for corresponding MR and non-MR ionization chamber models measured using the same cross-calibration technique demonstrated average percent differences of -0.1 ± 0.3% and 0.0 ± 0.2% for the Elekta Unity and ViewRay MRIdian, respectively. Investigation of the angular dependence of this correction factor demonstrated identical chamber response for equivalent MR-compatible and conventional chamber models.
Conclusions: This work provides critical experimental validation of MR-compatible ionization chamber performance, with a direct comparison of measured kB,Q values to corresponding conventional chamber models demonstrating nearly equivalent chamber response. kB,Q values determined using our experimental method will serve as an important reference for upcoming MR-linac reference dosimetry protocols and ultimately represent an important step towards accurate output calibration of MR-linac systems.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic