沙漠蚂蚁会根据位置、视觉地标和被困的同伴来避开埋伏的捕食者坑。

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2024-12-18 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241500
Adi Bar, Eden Raveh-Pal, Aziz Subach, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf
{"title":"沙漠蚂蚁会根据位置、视觉地标和被困的同伴来避开埋伏的捕食者坑。","authors":"Adi Bar, Eden Raveh-Pal, Aziz Subach, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Central-place foragers face high predation risk when repeatedly using routes near their nest, as predators can learn to ambush them there. We investigated the factors influencing the likelihood of desert ant foragers falling into pitfall traps, simulating common predators such as antlions or spiders. We varied the spatial configuration of the pitfall traps, the presence of trapped nestmates and the availability of visual landmarks to study the workers' susceptibility to falling into pits and their foraging success. Our results showed that a zigzag configuration of pits led to the fewest workers reaching the food reward, compared with straight-line and right-angled-triangle configurations. Over successive runs, workers became more efficient, with fewer falls into pits and faster food discovery, suggesting they either learned the locations of the pits or became more cautious. In any case, the ants learned about important landscape features close to their nest and the best way of navigating around it. Additionally, we examined the impact of trapped nestmates and visual landmarks. We found that pits marked with visual landmarks resulted in fewer falls. However, pits containing trapped nestmates attracted more ants, impaired food discovery and increased falling rates into pits, thereby imposing a twofold cost on ant foragers.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"11 12","pages":"241500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651900/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.\",\"authors\":\"Adi Bar, Eden Raveh-Pal, Aziz Subach, Susanne Foitzik, Inon Scharf\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsos.241500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Central-place foragers face high predation risk when repeatedly using routes near their nest, as predators can learn to ambush them there. We investigated the factors influencing the likelihood of desert ant foragers falling into pitfall traps, simulating common predators such as antlions or spiders. We varied the spatial configuration of the pitfall traps, the presence of trapped nestmates and the availability of visual landmarks to study the workers' susceptibility to falling into pits and their foraging success. Our results showed that a zigzag configuration of pits led to the fewest workers reaching the food reward, compared with straight-line and right-angled-triangle configurations. Over successive runs, workers became more efficient, with fewer falls into pits and faster food discovery, suggesting they either learned the locations of the pits or became more cautious. In any case, the ants learned about important landscape features close to their nest and the best way of navigating around it. Additionally, we examined the impact of trapped nestmates and visual landmarks. We found that pits marked with visual landmarks resulted in fewer falls. However, pits containing trapped nestmates attracted more ants, impaired food discovery and increased falling rates into pits, thereby imposing a twofold cost on ant foragers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21525,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Royal Society Open Science\",\"volume\":\"11 12\",\"pages\":\"241500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651900/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Royal Society Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241500\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当觅食者反复使用靠近巢穴的路线时,它们面临着很高的被捕食风险,因为捕食者可以学会在那里伏击它们。我们研究了影响沙漠蚂蚁觅食者落入陷阱可能性的因素,模拟了常见的捕食者,如蚁狮或蜘蛛。我们通过改变陷阱的空间配置、被困同伴的存在和视觉标志的可用性来研究工蚁对陷阱的易感性和觅食成功率。我们的研究结果表明,与直线和直角三角形结构相比,锯齿形结构的坑导致最少的工人获得食物奖励。在连续的运行中,工人们变得更有效率,更少掉到坑里,更快地发现食物,这表明他们要么知道了坑的位置,要么变得更加谨慎。无论如何,蚂蚁学会了巢附近的重要景观特征,以及在巢周围导航的最佳方式。此外,我们还研究了被困的同伴和视觉地标的影响。我们发现,有视觉标志的凹坑会减少摔倒的次数。然而,含有被困配偶的坑吸引了更多的蚂蚁,损害了食物的发现,增加了掉进坑里的几率,从而给蚂蚁觅食者带来了双倍的成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Desert ants avoid ambush predator pits depending on position, visual landmarks and trapped nestmates.

Central-place foragers face high predation risk when repeatedly using routes near their nest, as predators can learn to ambush them there. We investigated the factors influencing the likelihood of desert ant foragers falling into pitfall traps, simulating common predators such as antlions or spiders. We varied the spatial configuration of the pitfall traps, the presence of trapped nestmates and the availability of visual landmarks to study the workers' susceptibility to falling into pits and their foraging success. Our results showed that a zigzag configuration of pits led to the fewest workers reaching the food reward, compared with straight-line and right-angled-triangle configurations. Over successive runs, workers became more efficient, with fewer falls into pits and faster food discovery, suggesting they either learned the locations of the pits or became more cautious. In any case, the ants learned about important landscape features close to their nest and the best way of navigating around it. Additionally, we examined the impact of trapped nestmates and visual landmarks. We found that pits marked with visual landmarks resulted in fewer falls. However, pits containing trapped nestmates attracted more ants, impaired food discovery and increased falling rates into pits, thereby imposing a twofold cost on ant foragers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
期刊最新文献
Crystallographic and computational characterization and in silico target fishing of six aromatic and aliphatic sulfonamide derivatives. Evolution under intensive industrial breeding: skull size and shape comparison between historic and modern pig lineages. Investigating the encapsulation of lead bromide perovskite with poly(3-bromothiophene) for improved aqua stability and enhanced fluorescence memory. Modelling transmission and control of Toxoplasma gondii in New Zealand farmland. Pigs, people, and proximity: a 6000-year isotopic record of pig management in Ireland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1