质子照射用蒙特卡罗方法预测体外细胞存活的比较。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104867
Lucas Buvinic , Sophia Galvez , Maria Pia Valenzuela , Sebastian Salgado Maldonado , Andrea Russomando
{"title":"质子照射用蒙特卡罗方法预测体外细胞存活的比较。","authors":"Lucas Buvinic ,&nbsp;Sophia Galvez ,&nbsp;Maria Pia Valenzuela ,&nbsp;Sebastian Salgado Maldonado ,&nbsp;Andrea Russomando","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>It is possible to combine theoretical models with Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the relationship between radiation-induced initial DNA damage and cell survival. Several combinations of models have been proposed in recent years, sparking interest in comparing their predictions in view of future clinical applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Two in silico methods for calculating cell survival fractions were optimized for proton irradiation of the Chinese hamster V79 cell line, for LET values ranging from 3.40 and 100 keV/<span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>m. These methods, based on different Monte Carlo codes and theoretical models, were benchmarked against published V79 cell survival data to identify the sources of discrepancies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The predictive capacities of the methods were evaluated for several proton LET values using an external dataset. After recalibrating model parameters, multiple methods were assessed. This approach helped identify sources of variation, the main one being the simulated number of DSBs, which differed by a factor up to 3 between the two Monte Carlo codes. In this process a new method was defined, that, in all but one case, allows for a reduction in prediction error of up to 56%. Additionally, a freely available GUI for computing cell survival was refined, to facilitate further comparison of diverse theoretical models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The systematic comparison of two predictive chains, characterized by distinct applicability ranges and features, was conducted. Optimization and analysis of various combinations were undertaken to elucidate differences. Addressing and minimizing such discrepancies will be crucial for further enhancing the reliability of predictive models of cell survival, aiming for biologically informed treatment planning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104867"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of in vitro cell survival predictions using Monte Carlo methods for proton irradiation\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Buvinic ,&nbsp;Sophia Galvez ,&nbsp;Maria Pia Valenzuela ,&nbsp;Sebastian Salgado Maldonado ,&nbsp;Andrea Russomando\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104867\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose:</h3><div>It is possible to combine theoretical models with Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the relationship between radiation-induced initial DNA damage and cell survival. Several combinations of models have been proposed in recent years, sparking interest in comparing their predictions in view of future clinical applications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>Two in silico methods for calculating cell survival fractions were optimized for proton irradiation of the Chinese hamster V79 cell line, for LET values ranging from 3.40 and 100 keV/<span><math><mi>μ</mi></math></span>m. These methods, based on different Monte Carlo codes and theoretical models, were benchmarked against published V79 cell survival data to identify the sources of discrepancies.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>The predictive capacities of the methods were evaluated for several proton LET values using an external dataset. After recalibrating model parameters, multiple methods were assessed. This approach helped identify sources of variation, the main one being the simulated number of DSBs, which differed by a factor up to 3 between the two Monte Carlo codes. In this process a new method was defined, that, in all but one case, allows for a reduction in prediction error of up to 56%. Additionally, a freely available GUI for computing cell survival was refined, to facilitate further comparison of diverse theoretical models.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>The systematic comparison of two predictive chains, characterized by distinct applicability ranges and features, was conducted. Optimization and analysis of various combinations were undertaken to elucidate differences. Addressing and minimizing such discrepancies will be crucial for further enhancing the reliability of predictive models of cell survival, aiming for biologically informed treatment planning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104867\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724013358\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724013358","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将理论模型与蒙特卡罗模拟相结合,探讨辐射诱导的初始DNA损伤与细胞存活之间的关系。近年来提出了几种模型的组合,引起了人们对比较它们对未来临床应用的预测的兴趣。方法:优化了两种计算细胞存活分数的计算机方法,分别适用于中国仓鼠V79细胞系质子辐照,LET值为3.40和100 keV/μm。这些方法基于不同的蒙特卡罗代码和理论模型,并与公布的V79细胞存活数据进行基准测试,以确定差异的来源。结果:使用外部数据集评估了该方法对几个质子LET值的预测能力。在重新校准模型参数后,对多种方法进行了评估。这种方法有助于确定变化的来源,主要是dsb的模拟数量,两个蒙特卡罗代码之间的差异高达3倍。在这个过程中,定义了一种新方法,除了一种情况外,它可以将预测误差降低56%。此外,还改进了一个免费的用于计算细胞存活的GUI,以方便进一步比较不同的理论模型。结论:对两种具有不同适用范围和特点的预测链进行了系统比较。对不同组合进行了优化和分析,以阐明差异。解决和最小化这些差异对于进一步提高细胞存活预测模型的可靠性至关重要,旨在制定生物学知情的治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of in vitro cell survival predictions using Monte Carlo methods for proton irradiation

Purpose:

It is possible to combine theoretical models with Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the relationship between radiation-induced initial DNA damage and cell survival. Several combinations of models have been proposed in recent years, sparking interest in comparing their predictions in view of future clinical applications.

Methods:

Two in silico methods for calculating cell survival fractions were optimized for proton irradiation of the Chinese hamster V79 cell line, for LET values ranging from 3.40 and 100 keV/μm. These methods, based on different Monte Carlo codes and theoretical models, were benchmarked against published V79 cell survival data to identify the sources of discrepancies.

Results:

The predictive capacities of the methods were evaluated for several proton LET values using an external dataset. After recalibrating model parameters, multiple methods were assessed. This approach helped identify sources of variation, the main one being the simulated number of DSBs, which differed by a factor up to 3 between the two Monte Carlo codes. In this process a new method was defined, that, in all but one case, allows for a reduction in prediction error of up to 56%. Additionally, a freely available GUI for computing cell survival was refined, to facilitate further comparison of diverse theoretical models.

Conclusion:

The systematic comparison of two predictive chains, characterized by distinct applicability ranges and features, was conducted. Optimization and analysis of various combinations were undertaken to elucidate differences. Addressing and minimizing such discrepancies will be crucial for further enhancing the reliability of predictive models of cell survival, aiming for biologically informed treatment planning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
期刊最新文献
Response surface methodology for predicting optimal conditions in very low-dose chest CT imaging Direct comparison of PMT and SiPM PET systems using modified NEMA IEC Body phantom Incorporation of travel and confinement time in the evaluation of nuclear medicine therapy discharge criteria Commissioning small fields in lung using Monte Carlo corrected film measurements In vivo film detector for dose verification for IMRT/VMAT techniques
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1