眼动仪校准:人类能多好地重新定位目标?

IF 4.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Behavior Research Methods Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4
Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström
{"title":"眼动仪校准:人类能多好地重新定位目标?","authors":"Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström","doi":"10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8717,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Research Methods","volume":"57 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?\",\"authors\":\"Ignace T C Hooge, Roy S Hessels, Diederick C Niehorster, Richard Andersson, Marta K Skrok, Robert Konklewski, Patrycjusz Stremplewski, Maciej Nowakowski, Szymon Tamborski, Anna Szkulmowska, Maciej Szkulmowski, Marcus Nyström\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 <math><mmultiscripts><mrow></mrow> <mrow></mrow> <mo>∘</mo></mmultiscripts> </math> inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-024-02564-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不管精度如何,瞳孔眼动仪的误差约为0.5°。本文探讨了两个可能增加凝视信号不准确性的因素,即:1)瞳孔大小变化和瞳孔大小伪影(PSA); 2)经验丰富的个体无法精确地重新定位视觉目标。实验1使用传统的瞳孔- cr眼动仪,而实验2使用视网膜眼动仪,即FreezeEye眼动仪,消除了瞳孔估计。结果显示,PSA会显著影响注视精度,在校准和验证过程中造成最多0.5°的误差。基于瞳孔大小和明显凝视位移之间关系的校正大大减少了不准确性,强调了PSA对眼球追踪质量的影响。相反,实验2证明了人类精确的注视能力,表明凝视信号的准确性不受人类注视不一致性的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eye tracker calibration: How well can humans refixate a target?

Irrespective of the precision, the inaccuracy of a pupil-based eye tracker is about 0.5 . This paper delves into two factors that potentially increase the inaccuracy of the gaze signal, namely, 1) Pupil-size changes and the pupil-size artefact (PSA) and 2) the putative inability of experienced individuals to precisely refixate a visual target. Experiment 1 utilizes a traditional pupil-CR eye tracker, while Experiment 2 employs a retinal eye tracker, the FreezeEye tracker, eliminating the pupil-based estimation. Results reveal that the PSA significantly affects gaze accuracy, introducing up to 0.5 inaccuracies during calibration and validation. Corrections based on the relation between pupil size and apparent gaze shift substantially reduce inaccuracies, underscoring the PSA's influence on eye-tracking quality. Conversely, Experiment 2 demonstrates humans' precise refixation abilities, suggesting that the accuracy of the gaze signal is not limited by human refixation inconsistencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.30%
发文量
266
期刊介绍: Behavior Research Methods publishes articles concerned with the methods, techniques, and instrumentation of research in experimental psychology. The journal focuses particularly on the use of computer technology in psychological research. An annual special issue is devoted to this field.
期刊最新文献
Testing for group differences in multilevel vector autoregressive models. Distribution-free Bayesian analyses with the DFBA statistical package. Jiwar: A database and calculator for word neighborhood measures in 40 languages. Open-access network science: Investigating phonological similarity networks based on the SUBTLEX-US lexicon. Survey measures of metacognitive monitoring are often false.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1