部分和全弧线与动态弧线技术在铅笔束扫描质子治疗双侧头颈癌的可行性和剂量学研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1002/acm2.14611
Suresh Rana, Noufal Manthala Padannayil, Shyam Pokharel, Hina Saeed, Michael Kasper
{"title":"部分和全弧线与动态弧线技术在铅笔束扫描质子治疗双侧头颈癌的可行性和剂量学研究。","authors":"Suresh Rana, Noufal Manthala Padannayil, Shyam Pokharel, Hina Saeed, Michael Kasper","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC spot scanning has been introduced. The current study aims to determine whether the partial proton arc technique, in conjunction with DynamicARC pencil beam scanning (PBS), can meet clinical acceptance criteria for bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) and provide an alternative to full proton arc and traditional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study retrospectively included anonymized CT datasets from ten patients with bilateral HNC, all of whom had previously received photon treatment. The clinical target volumes (CTV) were categorized into three levels: CTV_7000, CTV_5950, and CTV_5600. IMPT plans included three beams, whereas DynamicARC plans included dual-partial-arcs (DPA), single-partial-arc (SPA), and single-full-arc (SFA). All plans underwent robust optimization considering setup (± 3 mm) and range (± 3%) uncertainties applied to the CTVs. DynamicARC plans were evaluated against the NRG-HN009 criteria and IMPT plans using various metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four techniques-IMPT, DPA, SPA, and SFA-demonstrated substantial compliance with NRG-HN009 dosimetric criteria. DynamicARC produced superior dose conformity, lower hotspot, and improved homogeneity for high-risk CTV compared to IMPT, with comparable performance for intermediate- and low-risk CTVs. DynamicARC reduced the D<sub>mean</sub> to the parotid glands by average differences of 14.5%-22.1% and to the oral cavity by an average difference of 15.75% compared to IMPT. DPA and SPA techniques achieved reductions in total integral dose of 3.7%-5.7% relative to IMPT. Overall, DPA yielded dosimetric results comparable to those of SFA while offering more conformal dose distributions and slightly better organ at risk sparing than SPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the ProteusOne with a partial gantry system, DPA and SPA, in conjunction with DynamicARC PBS protons, provided clear dosimetric advantages over three-field IMPT. Future clinical implementation and further research into optimizing DynamicARC protocols are warranted to fully realize the benefits of these techniques in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14611"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial and full arc with DynamicARC technique in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for bilateral head and neck cancer: A feasibility and dosimetric study.\",\"authors\":\"Suresh Rana, Noufal Manthala Padannayil, Shyam Pokharel, Hina Saeed, Michael Kasper\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC spot scanning has been introduced. The current study aims to determine whether the partial proton arc technique, in conjunction with DynamicARC pencil beam scanning (PBS), can meet clinical acceptance criteria for bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) and provide an alternative to full proton arc and traditional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study retrospectively included anonymized CT datasets from ten patients with bilateral HNC, all of whom had previously received photon treatment. The clinical target volumes (CTV) were categorized into three levels: CTV_7000, CTV_5950, and CTV_5600. IMPT plans included three beams, whereas DynamicARC plans included dual-partial-arcs (DPA), single-partial-arc (SPA), and single-full-arc (SFA). All plans underwent robust optimization considering setup (± 3 mm) and range (± 3%) uncertainties applied to the CTVs. DynamicARC plans were evaluated against the NRG-HN009 criteria and IMPT plans using various metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All four techniques-IMPT, DPA, SPA, and SFA-demonstrated substantial compliance with NRG-HN009 dosimetric criteria. DynamicARC produced superior dose conformity, lower hotspot, and improved homogeneity for high-risk CTV compared to IMPT, with comparable performance for intermediate- and low-risk CTVs. DynamicARC reduced the D<sub>mean</sub> to the parotid glands by average differences of 14.5%-22.1% and to the oral cavity by an average difference of 15.75% compared to IMPT. DPA and SPA techniques achieved reductions in total integral dose of 3.7%-5.7% relative to IMPT. Overall, DPA yielded dosimetric results comparable to those of SFA while offering more conformal dose distributions and slightly better organ at risk sparing than SPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the ProteusOne with a partial gantry system, DPA and SPA, in conjunction with DynamicARC PBS protons, provided clear dosimetric advantages over three-field IMPT. Future clinical implementation and further research into optimizing DynamicARC protocols are warranted to fully realize the benefits of these techniques in clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14611\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:介绍了一种新的质子束传输方法,即DynamicARC点扫描。目前的研究旨在确定部分质子弧技术,结合DynamicARC铅笔束扫描(PBS),是否能满足双侧头颈癌(HNC)的临床接受标准,并提供一种替代全质子弧和传统调强质子治疗(IMPT)的方法。方法:回顾性研究包括10例双侧HNC患者的匿名CT数据集,这些患者之前都接受过光子治疗。临床靶体积(CTV)分为CTV_7000、CTV_5950和CTV_5600三个级别。IMPT方案包括三束,而DynamicARC方案包括双部分弧(DPA)、单部分弧(SPA)和单全弧(SFA)。考虑到ctv的设置(±3mm)和范围(±3%)不确定性,所有方案都进行了稳健优化。动态arc计划根据NRG-HN009标准和使用各种指标的IMPT计划进行评估。结果:impt、DPA、SPA和sfa四种技术均符合NRG-HN009剂量学标准。与IMPT相比,DynamicARC在高风险CTV中具有更好的剂量一致性、更低的热点和更好的均匀性,在中低风险CTV中具有相当的性能。与IMPT相比,DynamicARC减少了对腮腺的平均差异14.5%-22.1%,对口腔的平均差异15.75%。与IMPT相比,DPA和SPA技术的总整体剂量降低了3.7%-5.7%。总体而言,DPA产生的剂量学结果与SFA相当,同时提供更适形的剂量分布,并且比SPA略好于器官风险保全。结论:在部分龙门系统的ProteusOne上,DPA和SPA结合DynamicARC PBS质子,比三场IMPT具有明显的剂量学优势。未来的临床实施和进一步优化DynamicARC协议的研究是必要的,以充分认识到这些技术在临床环境中的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Partial and full arc with DynamicARC technique in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for bilateral head and neck cancer: A feasibility and dosimetric study.

Purpose: A novel proton beam delivery method known as DynamicARC spot scanning has been introduced. The current study aims to determine whether the partial proton arc technique, in conjunction with DynamicARC pencil beam scanning (PBS), can meet clinical acceptance criteria for bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) and provide an alternative to full proton arc and traditional intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

Method: The study retrospectively included anonymized CT datasets from ten patients with bilateral HNC, all of whom had previously received photon treatment. The clinical target volumes (CTV) were categorized into three levels: CTV_7000, CTV_5950, and CTV_5600. IMPT plans included three beams, whereas DynamicARC plans included dual-partial-arcs (DPA), single-partial-arc (SPA), and single-full-arc (SFA). All plans underwent robust optimization considering setup (± 3 mm) and range (± 3%) uncertainties applied to the CTVs. DynamicARC plans were evaluated against the NRG-HN009 criteria and IMPT plans using various metrics.

Results: All four techniques-IMPT, DPA, SPA, and SFA-demonstrated substantial compliance with NRG-HN009 dosimetric criteria. DynamicARC produced superior dose conformity, lower hotspot, and improved homogeneity for high-risk CTV compared to IMPT, with comparable performance for intermediate- and low-risk CTVs. DynamicARC reduced the Dmean to the parotid glands by average differences of 14.5%-22.1% and to the oral cavity by an average difference of 15.75% compared to IMPT. DPA and SPA techniques achieved reductions in total integral dose of 3.7%-5.7% relative to IMPT. Overall, DPA yielded dosimetric results comparable to those of SFA while offering more conformal dose distributions and slightly better organ at risk sparing than SPA.

Conclusion: On the ProteusOne with a partial gantry system, DPA and SPA, in conjunction with DynamicARC PBS protons, provided clear dosimetric advantages over three-field IMPT. Future clinical implementation and further research into optimizing DynamicARC protocols are warranted to fully realize the benefits of these techniques in clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
期刊最新文献
Impact of acceleration treatment on treatment plan and delivery qualities in tomotherapy for lung cancer. T2-weighted imaging of rectal cancer using a 3D fast spin echo sequence with and without deep learning reconstruction: A reader study. Dose rate correction of a diode array for universal wedge field dosimetric verification. Evaluating the use of diagnostic CT with flattening filter free beams for palliative radiotherapy: Dosimetric impact of scanner calibration variability. Evaluation of the effect of metal stents on dose perturbation in the carbon beam irradiation field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1