{"title":"关节内类固醇注射及其联合肩胛上神经阻滞治疗肩关节粘连性囊炎的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验","authors":"Yaal Elango, Adinarayanan S, Srinivasan Swaminathan, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Sandeep Nema, Navin Kumar","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adhesive capsulitis is a distressing ailment that progressively limits the active and passive mobility of the shoulder joint. Physical therapy (PT) combined with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injection and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has shown improved functional outcomes. We aimed to assess whether providing both IAS injection and SSNB improved outcomes compared with IAS injection alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-six patients with adhesive capsulitis were randomized into three groups consisting of group IAS, group IAS+SSNB and group PT (control). All patients were assessed on day 0, week 2, 6 and 12 postintervention. The primary outcome was an improvement in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores at week 12 postintervention. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, Constant-Murley Range of Motion (ROM) scores, Quality of life (QoL) and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On combining IAS and SSNB, we found a statistically significant improvement in SPADI scores over IAS only at week 2 postintervention (33.6±8.0 vs 38.3±8.9, p=0.04) but not beyond. A significant reduction in SPADI, VAS and QuickDASH scores, along with an improvement in Constant-Murley ROM scores, was observed on day 0 and at weeks 2, 6 and 12 in both group IAS and group IAS+SSNB (p<0.05). MQS 3 scores significantly decreased up to week 6 in both groups. However, the addition of SSNB to IAS did not demonstrate a clinically significant difference in the study outcomes, except for a notable decrease in VAS in the immediate postintervention period. Additionally, no significant changes in QoL were observed among the groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IAS and IAS+SSNB improved analgesia, reduced disability and enhanced ROM. However, adding SSNB to IAS did not yield a clinically meaningful benefit in the study outcomes.Trial registration number TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2022/08/044519.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of intra-articular steroid injections and its combination with suprascapular nerve block for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yaal Elango, Adinarayanan S, Srinivasan Swaminathan, Kirthiha Govindaraj, Sandeep Nema, Navin Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adhesive capsulitis is a distressing ailment that progressively limits the active and passive mobility of the shoulder joint. Physical therapy (PT) combined with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injection and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has shown improved functional outcomes. We aimed to assess whether providing both IAS injection and SSNB improved outcomes compared with IAS injection alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-six patients with adhesive capsulitis were randomized into three groups consisting of group IAS, group IAS+SSNB and group PT (control). All patients were assessed on day 0, week 2, 6 and 12 postintervention. The primary outcome was an improvement in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores at week 12 postintervention. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, Constant-Murley Range of Motion (ROM) scores, Quality of life (QoL) and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) 3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On combining IAS and SSNB, we found a statistically significant improvement in SPADI scores over IAS only at week 2 postintervention (33.6±8.0 vs 38.3±8.9, p=0.04) but not beyond. A significant reduction in SPADI, VAS and QuickDASH scores, along with an improvement in Constant-Murley ROM scores, was observed on day 0 and at weeks 2, 6 and 12 in both group IAS and group IAS+SSNB (p<0.05). MQS 3 scores significantly decreased up to week 6 in both groups. However, the addition of SSNB to IAS did not demonstrate a clinically significant difference in the study outcomes, except for a notable decrease in VAS in the immediate postintervention period. Additionally, no significant changes in QoL were observed among the groups (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IAS and IAS+SSNB improved analgesia, reduced disability and enhanced ROM. However, adding SSNB to IAS did not yield a clinically meaningful benefit in the study outcomes.Trial registration number TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2022/08/044519.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105902\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105902","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:粘连性肩关节囊炎是一种令人痛苦的疾病,它会逐渐限制肩关节的主动和被动活动。物理治疗(PT)联合关节内类固醇(IAS)注射和肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)显示出改善的功能结果。我们的目的是评估与单独注射IAS相比,注射IAS和SSNB是否能改善预后。方法:96例粘连性囊炎患者随机分为IAS组、IAS+SSNB组和PT组(对照组)。所有患者在干预后第0天、第2周、第6周和第12周进行评估。主要结局是干预后第12周肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)评分的改善。次要指标为视觉模拟量表(VAS)、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾(QuickDASH)评分、Constant-Murley活动范围(ROM)评分、生活质量(QoL)和药物量化量表(MQS) 3。结果:在IAS和SSNB联合使用时,我们发现仅在干预后第2周,SPADI评分比IAS有统计学意义上的改善(33.6±8.0 vs 38.3±8.9,p=0.04),但没有超过IAS。在第0天、第2周、第6周和第12周,IAS组和IAS+SSNB组均观察到SPADI、VAS和QuickDASH评分显著降低,以及Constant-Murley ROM评分的改善(p0.05)。结论:IAS和IAS+SSNB均可改善镇痛、减少残疾和增强ROM。然而,在IAS中添加SSNB并没有在研究结果中产生有临床意义的益处。试验注册号试验注册号:CTRI/2022/08/044519。
Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of intra-articular steroid injections and its combination with suprascapular nerve block for adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a randomized clinical trial.
Background: Adhesive capsulitis is a distressing ailment that progressively limits the active and passive mobility of the shoulder joint. Physical therapy (PT) combined with intra-articular steroid (IAS) injection and suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) has shown improved functional outcomes. We aimed to assess whether providing both IAS injection and SSNB improved outcomes compared with IAS injection alone.
Methods: Ninety-six patients with adhesive capsulitis were randomized into three groups consisting of group IAS, group IAS+SSNB and group PT (control). All patients were assessed on day 0, week 2, 6 and 12 postintervention. The primary outcome was an improvement in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores at week 12 postintervention. Secondary outcomes were Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, Constant-Murley Range of Motion (ROM) scores, Quality of life (QoL) and Medication Quantification Scale (MQS) 3.
Results: On combining IAS and SSNB, we found a statistically significant improvement in SPADI scores over IAS only at week 2 postintervention (33.6±8.0 vs 38.3±8.9, p=0.04) but not beyond. A significant reduction in SPADI, VAS and QuickDASH scores, along with an improvement in Constant-Murley ROM scores, was observed on day 0 and at weeks 2, 6 and 12 in both group IAS and group IAS+SSNB (p<0.05). MQS 3 scores significantly decreased up to week 6 in both groups. However, the addition of SSNB to IAS did not demonstrate a clinically significant difference in the study outcomes, except for a notable decrease in VAS in the immediate postintervention period. Additionally, no significant changes in QoL were observed among the groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: Both IAS and IAS+SSNB improved analgesia, reduced disability and enhanced ROM. However, adding SSNB to IAS did not yield a clinically meaningful benefit in the study outcomes.Trial registration number TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2022/08/044519.
期刊介绍:
Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications.
Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).